Miscellaneous News

iewgnem

Captain
Registered Member

Chinese nuclear experts believe Japan could build nuclear weapons in less than 3 years​

Late US statesman Henry Kissinger’s dire warning about Tokyo aiming to become a nuclear power by 2028 is being re-examined by Beijing

View attachment 167013

One of Henry Kissinger’s final and most sobering predictions before his death was that Japan would eventually pursue nuclear weapons.

In a 2023 interview with The Economist, Kissinger warned that Japan was “heading towards becoming a nuclear power in five years”.

Chinese nuclear experts estimate that Japan has the political motivation but also the technical capacity to develop nuclear weapons in less than three years, echoing Kissinger’s warning that Japan harbours ambitions to revive its pre-war military stature when the opportunity arises.

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi touched upon the red line of Japan’s three non-nuclear principles last month, seeking to create a legal opening.

Last week, a senior official from the Japanese prime minister’s office responsible for advising Takaichi on security policy told Asahi Shimbun that given the increasingly severe security environment around Japan, he believed “Japan should possess nuclear weapons”.

However, Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara reaffirmed on December 18 that the country’s decades-old pledge to never possess nuclear weapons by stating that its nuclear policy had not changed.

Despite this, most nuclear experts say Japan is in a state of “nuclear latency” – meaning that while it does not now deploy nuclear weapons, it could cross the threshold in a short time to produce deployable nuclear arms.

“The principles of nuclear weapons can be understood even by high school students. Countries like North Korea, India and Pakistan have managed to develop them,” a nuclear scientist from western China said.

“Technically speaking, Japan possesses sufficient industrial capacity to build even more advanced nuclear weapons than these countries in a short time. Moreover, Japan has stockpiled enough nuclear fuel under the pretext of civilian nuclear power.”

There is speculation that Japan already has two nuclear bombs, according to the expert, who asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the topic.

“If they dare to pursue nuclear weapons, that number could grow to three or four. And nowadays, the yield of just one tactical nuclear weapon is 10 times that of the two bombs they once received,” he said.

“However, the price Japan would pay for developing nuclear weapons would be far greater than for North Korea, India or Pakistan, because Japan is a defeated nation.”

A Beijing-based nuclear expert noted the key difference between nuclear weapons and nuclear power: while power relied on a controlled reaction, weapons were uncontrolled.

“Japan has enough nuclear material, like plutonium, to build a weapon, and likely the technology for enriched uranium, though US approval could be a factor,” she said.

Kissinger’s prediction “is technically possible”, she added.

Another expert said that a main challenge for Japan was to develop suitable delivery vehicles. Obtaining highly enriched uranium could be difficult to carry out under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). It would “need to be done covertly”, he said.

Japan has relevant technical reserves in terms of raw materials, manufacturing technology and delivery methods, according to openly available information.

It is also the only country in the world with a complete nuclear fuel cycle system but no nuclear weapons. According to data released by the Japan Atomic Energy Commission in August, Japan’s total separated plutonium amounted to about 44.4 tonnes, with 8.6 tonnes stored domestically and 35.8 tonnes held in Britain and France.

Although this plutonium is not weapons grade, Japan has sophisticated refining ability. Given that only about 8kg (17lbs) of plutonium is needed to make a nuclear bomb, the domestic stockpile alone is more than enough.

Due to Japan’s limited territory, it cannot conduct explosive tests in remote desert areas as China and the US have. However, modern nuclear weapons development can rely on more advanced and discreet “testing” methods.

The United States signed the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty in 1996, and although it has never been ratified by the US Congress, the country has not conducted nuclear explosive tests since then.

In May last year, the US conducted a subcritical test in Nevada, using explosives to compress nuclear material to the brink of a chain reaction to observe changes. Since no actual nuclear explosion occurred, the test drew little attention, and the collected data could be fed into supercomputers for research.

Japan is not lacking in computing resources either – its Fugaku supercomputer ranks high on the Top500 list. Using similar methods, Japan could conduct simulated explosion tests.

Japan’s Gekko XII laser facility in Osaka can compress fuel pellets with lasers for civilian nuclear fusion research – a process similar in principle to the secondary implosion stage of a hydrogen bomb explosion.

A warhead also needs a delivery platform. The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency’s Epsilon rocket is designed as a solid-fuel rocket, which offers faster response times compared to liquid-fuel rockets that require pre-fuelling – characteristics typical of intercontinental ballistic missiles.

Although its improved Epsilon-S model has recently faced difficulties, the Epsilon can deliver a 1.2-tonne payload into low-Earth orbit. If a satellite were replaced with a nuclear warhead and guidance systems were modified, it could potentially be used for long-range nuclear strikes.

Japan is also improving its Type 12 cruise missile, equipped with a combined guidance system using GPS, terrain matching and terminal active radar. An updated version of the missile will have a range of about 1,000km (620 miles).

Japan has also bought US-made Tomahawk cruise missiles with a range of around 1,600km for ship-based deployment, which together would form a complementary long-range strike system.

On December 22, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian responded to recent remarks from Japanese officials about potentially acquiring nuclear weapons. He stated that China was alarmed by these comments, calling them a threat to regional peace and a direct challenge to the global nuclear non-proliferation system.

Lin urged Japan to honour its international and legal commitments and to immediately stop any move towards the wrong path of nuclear armament.

In his 2023 interview, Kissinger denied that Japan had any intention of being a permanent part of the global multilateral system. Many geopolitical analysts have interpreted this remark as suggesting that Japan may seek to revive its pre-war military ambitions when conditions become favourable.

As the only country to have suffered nuclear attacks, Japan is a member of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons but has never signed the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, the comprehensive multilateral agreement to ban nuclear weapons entirely.

At present, the IAEA’s oversight of Japan’s nuclear materials, the Japanese government’s official commitment to the three non-nuclear principles and domestic public opinion remain key factors in maintaining the status quo.



THE WORLD AIN'T ALL SUNSHINE AND RAINBOWS - ROCKY BALBOA
Japan messed up the first rule of building nukes, if a nuclear power that can wipe you out says you're building nukes, you better not be bluffing.
 

doggydogdo

Junior Member
Registered Member

Chinese nuclear experts believe Japan could build nuclear weapons in less than 3 years​

Late US statesman Henry Kissinger’s dire warning about Tokyo aiming to become a nuclear power by 2028 is being re-examined by Beijing

View attachment 167013

One of Henry Kissinger’s final and most sobering predictions before his death was that Japan would eventually pursue nuclear weapons.

In a 2023 interview with The Economist, Kissinger warned that Japan was “heading towards becoming a nuclear power in five years”.

Chinese nuclear experts estimate that Japan has the political motivation but also the technical capacity to develop nuclear weapons in less than three years, echoing Kissinger’s warning that Japan harbours ambitions to revive its pre-war military stature when the opportunity arises.

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi touched upon the red line of Japan’s three non-nuclear principles last month, seeking to create a legal opening.

Last week, a senior official from the Japanese prime minister’s office responsible for advising Takaichi on security policy told Asahi Shimbun that given the increasingly severe security environment around Japan, he believed “Japan should possess nuclear weapons”.

However, Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara reaffirmed on December 18 that the country’s decades-old pledge to never possess nuclear weapons by stating that its nuclear policy had not changed.

Despite this, most nuclear experts say Japan is in a state of “nuclear latency” – meaning that while it does not now deploy nuclear weapons, it could cross the threshold in a short time to produce deployable nuclear arms.

“The principles of nuclear weapons can be understood even by high school students. Countries like North Korea, India and Pakistan have managed to develop them,” a nuclear scientist from western China said.

“Technically speaking, Japan possesses sufficient industrial capacity to build even more advanced nuclear weapons than these countries in a short time. Moreover, Japan has stockpiled enough nuclear fuel under the pretext of civilian nuclear power.”

There is speculation that Japan already has two nuclear bombs, according to the expert, who asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the topic.

“If they dare to pursue nuclear weapons, that number could grow to three or four. And nowadays, the yield of just one tactical nuclear weapon is 10 times that of the two bombs they once received,” he said.

“However, the price Japan would pay for developing nuclear weapons would be far greater than for North Korea, India or Pakistan, because Japan is a defeated nation.”

A Beijing-based nuclear expert noted the key difference between nuclear weapons and nuclear power: while power relied on a controlled reaction, weapons were uncontrolled.

“Japan has enough nuclear material, like plutonium, to build a weapon, and likely the technology for enriched uranium, though US approval could be a factor,” she said.

Kissinger’s prediction “is technically possible”, she added.

Another expert said that a main challenge for Japan was to develop suitable delivery vehicles. Obtaining highly enriched uranium could be difficult to carry out under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). It would “need to be done covertly”, he said.

Japan has relevant technical reserves in terms of raw materials, manufacturing technology and delivery methods, according to openly available information.

It is also the only country in the world with a complete nuclear fuel cycle system but no nuclear weapons. According to data released by the Japan Atomic Energy Commission in August, Japan’s total separated plutonium amounted to about 44.4 tonnes, with 8.6 tonnes stored domestically and 35.8 tonnes held in Britain and France.

Although this plutonium is not weapons grade, Japan has sophisticated refining ability. Given that only about 8kg (17lbs) of plutonium is needed to make a nuclear bomb, the domestic stockpile alone is more than enough.

Due to Japan’s limited territory, it cannot conduct explosive tests in remote desert areas as China and the US have. However, modern nuclear weapons development can rely on more advanced and discreet “testing” methods.

The United States signed the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty in 1996, and although it has never been ratified by the US Congress, the country has not conducted nuclear explosive tests since then.

In May last year, the US conducted a subcritical test in Nevada, using explosives to compress nuclear material to the brink of a chain reaction to observe changes. Since no actual nuclear explosion occurred, the test drew little attention, and the collected data could be fed into supercomputers for research.

Japan is not lacking in computing resources either – its Fugaku supercomputer ranks high on the Top500 list. Using similar methods, Japan could conduct simulated explosion tests.

Japan’s Gekko XII laser facility in Osaka can compress fuel pellets with lasers for civilian nuclear fusion research – a process similar in principle to the secondary implosion stage of a hydrogen bomb explosion.

A warhead also needs a delivery platform. The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency’s Epsilon rocket is designed as a solid-fuel rocket, which offers faster response times compared to liquid-fuel rockets that require pre-fuelling – characteristics typical of intercontinental ballistic missiles.

Although its improved Epsilon-S model has recently faced difficulties, the Epsilon can deliver a 1.2-tonne payload into low-Earth orbit. If a satellite were replaced with a nuclear warhead and guidance systems were modified, it could potentially be used for long-range nuclear strikes.

Japan is also improving its Type 12 cruise missile, equipped with a combined guidance system using GPS, terrain matching and terminal active radar. An updated version of the missile will have a range of about 1,000km (620 miles).

Japan has also bought US-made Tomahawk cruise missiles with a range of around 1,600km for ship-based deployment, which together would form a complementary long-range strike system.

On December 22, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian responded to recent remarks from Japanese officials about potentially acquiring nuclear weapons. He stated that China was alarmed by these comments, calling them a threat to regional peace and a direct challenge to the global nuclear non-proliferation system.

Lin urged Japan to honour its international and legal commitments and to immediately stop any move towards the wrong path of nuclear armament.

In his 2023 interview, Kissinger denied that Japan had any intention of being a permanent part of the global multilateral system. Many geopolitical analysts have interpreted this remark as suggesting that Japan may seek to revive its pre-war military ambitions when conditions become favourable.

As the only country to have suffered nuclear attacks, Japan is a member of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons but has never signed the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, the comprehensive multilateral agreement to ban nuclear weapons entirely.

At present, the IAEA’s oversight of Japan’s nuclear materials, the Japanese government’s official commitment to the three non-nuclear principles and domestic public opinion remain key factors in maintaining the status quo.



THE WORLD AIN'T ALL SUNSHINE AND RAINBOWS - ROCKY BALBOA
US knows how dangerous Japanese militarism with nukes is. They literally still worship their war criminal ancestors does anyone think they forgot about getting nuked? US will never let japan get a nuke
 

BasilicaLew

Junior Member
Registered Member
Last edited:

jiajia99

Junior Member
Registered Member
They are becoming a bit sloppy to say this out loud. In the past they wouldn’t dare to utter a word of this. Either they are becoming complacent or they are truly starting to feel the effects of inbreeding and possibly extreme hubris that it only takes one freak event to really screw these people up. Remember that these people are situated in Europe and if Europe or the USA goes to pieces given the current state of the world, they either have a deal to sell out the west to China or they have already began to go into hiding to avoid the collapse because nothing their false money can do can help to save this failing project known as the western hegemony. Any they better have a good place to hide begin money at the end of the day cannot save then for a single bullet, that is highly likely to be made in China given Europe’s dying manufacturing base. Seriously these people overestimate themselves a lot because they are are supposed to be all powerful, why is the west becoming a cesspool on there watch unless they plan to make bank of a collapsing west which honestly doesn’t seem to be practical in the long run


Not much to say here, the country is beyond saving.
Has harsh as this sounds but does the words karma mean anything to these people.
 
Last edited:

MortyandRick

Senior Member
Registered Member
Not much to say here, the country is beyond saving.
Where’s the western condemnation? Oh right, racism is not ok unless its towards Chinese people.
This should be plastered across Chinese media
I really wish Chinese media is better handled, imagine this could be used to stoke separatist feelings in north east India. Wasted opportunity, sad loss of life.
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
The Western victim culture follows exactly how Jews are seen as victims versus everyone else as victims. Would it be surprising to some day hear Israel say out loud that what Japan did during WWII and especially to the Chinese wasn't as bad as how China portrays it? Even though Japan attacked the US in WWII, a lot China haters in the US will defend what Japan did to China as okay. If you ever had a conversation with someone who's Jewish over WWII, they will tell you that by default. Don't say Chinese were in any way treated as badly during WWII as Jews were even with the indiscriminate execution of women and children or Japanese medical experiments that some say were worse than the ones performed on the Jews. One experiment had no medical purpose. The Japanese put a Chinese mother and her baby in a room where the floor could be heated to high deathly temperatures. The Japanese wanted to know how long it would take for the mother to throw her baby on the floor to stand on to save herself. Look at how the West today just because China doesn't need them economically is trying to rally the world to hate China. Having the world thinking what the Japanese did to the Chinese was not serious would be a measure of their success in their anti-China campaign. That's the price Chinese must pay for not seeing the West as their masters.
It’s obvious from the culture and art produced that Jewish dominated western culture is anti human and pessimistic on human nature whereas Chinese civilisation under Confucian influence views human beings as inherently good. Legalism aside of course.

Why do you think that a westerner’s first impulse at coming to a clean and upright society like China is to wonder why annyone hasn’t stolen annytjing yet?


let them fight, let the izzat superpower face off against MAGA white supremacy and see who earns China‘s favour.
 
Top