Shenyang next gen combat aircraft (?J-XDS)

[no_name]

Why are you posting a stupid comment from whoever said something? Is this in any point relevant nor important to discuss?

I let my compulsion got the better of me. My bad.

 

[Deino]

I let my compulsion got the better of me. My bad.

The point is - and I know I'm also often not following my own advice - it is useless to discuss nonsense and stupid thoughts, cope or whatever is barely worth to be discussed even more so it makes it even less pointless to get upset about it.

 

[Wrought]

This guy cited some Chinese paper claiming a certain high-performance fighter jet has worse maneuverability than the F-4, using it to prove China's sixth-generation fighter is less maneuverable than the F-4. In his past posts, he also quoted some trashy article claiming the J-36's stealth capabilities are nearly indistinguishable from fifth-generation fighters. In short, he's just a CCP hater—not worth paying attention to.

Ok, this one actually made me laugh audibly. Because we know for a fact it's the other way around. He's an idiot through and through.

1. J-20 already carries six internally, as per Yankee.

2. F-35 can't (yet) carry six internally, as per

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and also an

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1971269257783878014

 

[donnnage99]

Ok, this one actually made me laugh audibly. Because we know for a fact it's the other way around. He's an idiot through and through.

1. J-20 already carries six internally, as per Yankee.

2. F-35 can't (yet) carry six internally, as per

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and also an

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1971269257783878014

Stop! You're devolving this board to twitter fanboy war. Unless it's outrageous comment from military officials or well known analyst. Debunking some random twitter user with 500 followers is pointless to say the least.

 

[TAE]

What is shown in this figure is specific to Lambda wing. What I was trying to say was that AWT may even have advantage against split aileron outside of the context of Lambda wings, though I'm not entirely sure. Sorry my sentence was not clear

Edit: The reason I think AMT maybe superior to split ailerons in general is that:

1, The response is "snappier", AMT at critical angle can induce drag more rapidly then split-ailerons.

2, At high AoA, the upper lips of split-ailerons is more obscured by the main wing relative to incoming airstream. While AWT can be pitched at their critical angle at pretty much any AoA.

AMTs operate differently and yes they are much more responsive that split rudders. Have done a piece on this. Enjoy the read!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[GTI]

AMTs operate differently and yes they are much more responsive that split rudders. Have done a piece on this. Enjoy the read!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I’m not sure you’ve got that quite right.

 

[ACuriousPLAFan]

The J-XDS/50 has been spotted flying just recently.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2001819318074691952

 

[burritocannon]

idk this resembles another piece of footage from a couple months back but i cba to go and check if it matches rn

 

[ACuriousPLAFan]

Today marks the one-year anniversary on the first flight of the J-XDS/50.

 

[Deino]

Today marks the one-year anniversary on the first flight of the J-XDS/50.

View attachment 166597

Yes, but wasn't this the very first image?