Miscellaneous News

Sardaukar20

Major
Registered Member
How is India this worried about Tejas export orders when they only built 42 airframes in 40 years, a good number still without engines? Pakistan didn't even push for JF-17 exports until over 100 planes entered service.
The troubled Tejas started out as an ambitions program by India that started around 1983 to push it into the club of 4th gen fighter makers. If successful, India would have entered the 4th gen fighter era earlier of China. But alas that never happened.

Decades later, Modi's BJP government took the stuttering Tejas program into it's Supapowar project. India is already be a Supapowar, so it should have been exporting high value defence products like fighter jets. That is why despite the abysmal production and adoption rates by the Indian Airforce, India is so anxious to export the Tejas. Even when they are still waiting for a trickle of engines from the GE to complete Tejas airframes for their own squadrons. They have gone to great lengths to showcase their Tejas in airshows, lobby other nations to buy the jets, and even lied about obtaining orders. It's all to feed their Supapowar project.

The Jai Hinds treat the world aviation market like gullible fools. They boast that their Tejas outperforms the JF-17, J-10, and even the J-20. But they also ignore that all successful fighter exports must have successful domestic service. The Gripen, FA-50, and JF-17 all had successful production runs and service for their respective air forces years before they were exported. The Tejas is barely filling up Indian squadrons and the Indians are already boasting about export orders.

At Dubai, the Indians waved off a bad oil leak as "hater conspiracy". Then their pilot attempted a dangerous stunt at very low altitudes for the cameras. He made a slight mistake, but at that altitude, there was no margin for error, and lost his life as a result. Then the Indian media were busy blaming other nations and boasting that the Tejas has less crashes than indigenous Pakistani and Chinese jets. This is all a symptom of that Supapowar mindset.
 

4Tran

Junior Member
Registered Member
If you were to start a military conflict, it's should be precisely when you're winning.
The worst time to start a conflict is when you're already losing.
Art of War's "win before you fight" specifically implies fighting when you're winning and only when you're winning.
That's what the Americans thought when they dragged themselves into Iraq and Afghanistan. The actual best time to fight a war is when doing so is better than all the alternatives. Right now, China gets pretty much everything it wants without having to fight so what are they actually gaining?

Against Japan, there's just not a whole lot of potential gains for China. China doesn't want any Japanese territory other than the Senkakus, and they're not worth fighting over. It might want to establish Okinawa as the Republic of Ryukyu, but that's not a realistic outcome. And there are lots of risks involved, for diplomatic impact, to Russian-styled sanctions, to the possibility of a military defeat. Sure, I don't think the latter is likely, but only a fool would entirely discount the risk.
 

Puss in Boots

Junior Member
Registered Member
If you were to start a military conflict, it's should be precisely when you're winning.
The worst time to start a conflict is when you're already losing.
Art of War's "win before you fight" specifically implies fighting when you're winning and only when you're winning.

In this case it would obviously not be a good look for China to start the fight out of the blue, but it would be in China's interest to force the losing side to start the fight. Japan was especially vulnerable to the fallacy of fighting when losing when they were under US oil embargo 80 years ago, and they can be made to do so again.

"上兵伐谋,其次伐交,其次伐兵,其下攻城。"​

The current confrontation between China and Japan is still in its second phase. Only when it truly enters the stage of war will the optimal time to launch an attack be discussed.
Eighty years ago, Japan lost from the very first step. It never even had a well-thought-out plan to attack the United States. At the beginning of World War II, the United States possessed unparalleled industrial capacity, and the vast majority of strategic materials used by Japan in its invasion of China were obtained from the US. Therefore, Japan had no chance of defeating the United States from the outset. Its hasty declaration of war against the US without addressing these fundamental issues was essentially a gambler's mentality. Japan's defeat wasn't due to declaring war on the US while at a disadvantage, but rather because it never had a moment of advantage.
 
Last edited:

Rafi

Junior Member
Registered Member
A lot of the Japanese people just don’t know about the war time atrocities, I have Japanese family members and they are not taught at school about it, even if somehow they are taught about it, it is glossed over with excuses or denial about the scale of organised geniside.

but from what I have seen, young Japanese girls are more open to learning and accepting Japanese atrocities, that is the sign of hope for the future.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
A lot of the Japanese people just don’t know about the war time atrocities, I have Japanese family members and they are not taught at school about it, even if somehow they are taught about it, it is glossed over with excuses or denial about the scale of organised geniside.

but from what I have seen, young Japanese girls are more open to learning and accepting Japanese atrocities, that is the sign of hope for the future.
That doesn't surprise me; it would surprise me if they did know about their WWII atrocities. What surprised me is that Japanese people don't have a correct understanding of current events like what their president actually said.
 

GulfLander

Brigadier
Registered Member
Nvidia Says It’s Not Enron in Private Memo Refuting Accounting Questions
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
....

According to Barron’s, Nvidia’s investor-relations team sent a memo to Wall Street analysts seeking to refute key points of Burry’s recent arguments against the graphics-chip maker, on topics ranging from the use of stock-based compensation to accounting. But it’s clearly the latter topic that has Nvidia on edge, alongside a perception that it’s engaged in vendor financing to make demand appear strong.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Randomuser

Major
Registered Member
Shanghai may have a lot of cucks. But people can't be perfect. As long as they generate a net benefit to China and not doing stuff like selling Chinese military secrets, they can be accepted. Everyone has their role to play.

As for Japan I apply for the same thing as Korea. For most of history they were nobodies and China was hogging all the spotlight. It's only in the recent century thanks to western tech they are finally somebody. And now they are seeing that go away since not only can China also learn western tech but possible even better than them. Korea is angry their time in the sun is cut short while Japan is angry their glory will be coming to an end soon and they will be going back to that boring island.

When you had something and now you don't or will lose it, of co you will angey
 
Top