Does production Su-75 keep the reinforcement bar in the belly intake?
S-70 design should be more or less set in stone by now, probably has been for a while now. It's assembled at NAPO in Novosibirsk. Su-57 and presumably Su-75 are and will be assembled at KnAAPO in Komsomolsk-on-Amur. So while the design team has been and probably still is busy, production facilities are seperate.That is the real scale Su-75 aircraft model they built for testing cockpit integration etc. The one showed at exhibitions. But according to the patents they changed the airframe design since.
Sukhoi should be real busy. With the Su-57M, Su-75, dual seater Su-57, S-70 drone.
There is a revised design, which is a refined version of the initial design shown by the mock up. With more internal space, presumably for fuel to increase range, also changes to some control surfaces etc.Is there a production Su-75 already?
but I think its just an unrelease photo back when Rostec did a photoshoot with a Su-57
Shoigu demanded that the range of the Raduga missile be increased to 300 km.
Sergei Bogatikov, CEO of the Raduga State Design Bureau, reported to Shoigu that one of the systems, whose production had been increased, had a range of 250 kilometers. The minister stated that greater range was needed.
During an inspection of state defense procurement at the Raduga State Defense Industrial Complex, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu demanded that the company's CEO, Sergei Bogatikov, increase the range of one of its missile types to 300 kilometers or more. According to Bogatikov, the current range of this missile is 250 kilometers.
The company's director also informed Shoigu that Raduga had fully fulfilled the state defense order last year. Since the start of the special military operation, production volumes of precision-guided munitions have increased eightfold by some measures.
The minister was also on the testing of a new missile with a range of 310 kilometers and an 800-kilogram warhead. The missile's cost has also been reduced. Sergei Shoigu emphasized the importance of ensuring the Russian Armed Forces have sufficient quantities of this missile.
The Russian company "Russian Combat Vehicles" unveiled the "Legioner" armored pickup truck. It is not yet clear whether the new armored vehicle will be mass-produced. The armored vehicle was built using the experience of modern warfare. The all-wheel drive "Legioner" features an armored cabin and an open cargo bed. The pickup is equipped with a mount for a machine gun or electronic warfare systems. The bed can carry two wounded personnel. The pickup has a BR 5 protection class, protecting the crew from automatic weapons fire, including rifle rounds with heat-strengthened cores. The "Legioner" armored vehicle weighs 6.5 tons and has a payload capacity of 2.5 tons. The armored vehicle is equipped with a YaMZ-534 diesel engine producing 200 hp, allowing it to reach speeds of up to 100 km/h. The armored vehicle has a range of approximately 750 km. The price of the "Legioner" pickup has not been announced.
I highly doubt that.
The twin cannon thing denied the BMPT of the main asset that could had fulfill its purpose in urban warfare.
Early concepts were much better, separate 30mm cannons on one chassis that can engage 2 separate targets at once offering much higher elevation.
View attachment 161895
Which vehicle has better ability to engage higrises and tall spots in general. The BMPT which is a dedicated urban and tank fire support asset or BMP-2 & 3 which are generic IFVs?
Max elevation for each vehicle is:
BMP-2 75 degrees
BMP-3 60 degrees
BMPT 45 degrees
A vehicle that perfectly fits what BMPT should be already exists. T-15, tank level protection, with a more flexible yet powerful weapon system and dedicated AT weaponry, addon bonus it's an IFV so it can carry meat.
They should make a T-90 based T-15 instead.