Miscellaneous News

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Sucks to be all those Europeans and Asians who thought trump America would really stand for white Anglo supremacy and not bow or compromise before Chinese supremacy.

looking at Europeans especially who could have had their own Chinese deal as early as 2021.
I will cynically note that this newfound bonhomie from the trump presidency and indeed the Anglo American regime is not out of their own choice but rather through the raw hard power of Chinese arms and science.

Remember that this is the same Anglo American government that advocated an “all of society” response against chinas rise, as articulated by KiRon Skinner, or the pogroms against Asian elders of 2019, the blood libel of the “China virus“ of 2020, the new “8 power alliance” of the Biden admin with participation from India, to name a few. I think it’s clear from the previous years reports of failed American naval ops against Chinese electronic warfare in the South China Sea and now theNGAD and Chinese weapons and drones and its clear that Anglo American powerbrokers recalculated and determined they could not fight China and win as they had hoped back in 2019.

Chinese leaders already knew this, from having dealt with Xiongnu in past history. The art of war against an enemy like the Atlanticist white supremacist clique is to dissimulate, as China successfully did. I know it’s a meme of “China do nothing. Win” but that’s to ignore the many man hours of work out in by Chinese leaders, intelligence operatives and diplomats behind the scenes. Polish turnaround on that trade line would not have happened this quickly without Chinese power. They certainly wouldn’t have cared if China was like India or turkey Nor even Iran with compromised leaders.

as Buadrakumar puts it:
According to the well-known American strategic thinker George Friedman (Chairman, Geopolitical Futures), the fundamental issue here is two-fold — namely, putting pressure on Russia to bring the war in Ukraine to a halt and, second, ending the US’ ‘dual relationship’ with China.

Friedman explains: “The dual relationship with China is we [US] are economically dependent on China. China is dependent on us but we are hostile in the military dimension. It is very dangerous to be economically dependent on a country which is constantly carrying out military actions that appear to be preparations for war against the United States. So, you can’t have a dual path. You can’t both be very closely integrated economically and hostile militarily.

“So we want to have closer relations with the Chinese. We need that. They need that.”
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

white supremacy and white worship is really the soft power of slave minded, internalised racism Indians, Asians and Iranians selling out their national interest to become one with the Anglo Atlanticist ruling class.
 

Randomuser

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Slighty old news but did you know Jack Ma is back at Alibaba?

Not in official capacity but that doesn't mean much since a lot of times in history, the person calling the shots doesn't make himself public.

Western and Indian media are gonna have to explain why he's back when last time I checked, they swore he was dead.

As for why he has returned. Something about getting Alibaba back on track especially in a time of AI.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
I will cynically note that this newfound bonhomie from the trump presidency and indeed the Anglo American regime is not out of their own choice but rather through the raw hard power of Chinese arms and science.

Remember that this is the same Anglo American government that advocated an “all of society” response against chinas rise, as articulated by KiRon Skinner, or the pogroms against Asian elders of 2019, the blood libel of the “China virus“ of 2020, the new “8 power alliance” of the Biden admin with participation from India, to name a few. I think it’s clear from the previous years reports of failed American naval ops against Chinese electronic warfare in the South China Sea and now theNGAD and Chinese weapons and drones and its clear that Anglo American powerbrokers recalculated and determined they could not fight China and win as they had hoped back in 2019.

Chinese leaders already knew this, from having dealt with Xiongnu in past history. The art of war against an enemy like the Atlanticist white supremacist clique is to dissimulate, as China successfully did. I know it’s a meme of “China do nothing. Win” but that’s to ignore the many man hours of work out in by Chinese leaders, intelligence operatives and diplomats behind the scenes. Polish turnaround on that trade line would not have happened this quickly without Chinese power. They certainly wouldn’t have cared if China was like India or turkey Nor even Iran with compromised leaders.

as Buadrakumar puts it:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

white supremacy and white worship is really the soft power of slave minded, internalised racism Indians, Asians and Iranians selling out their national interest to become one with the Anglo Atlanticist ruling class.

Does that mean Chinese are honorary Aryans now?
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
@Chevalier
George Friedman is lying. It was all about maintaining the US as the sole superpower and containing China. The neocons in the US had plans to fight China since the early 2000s at least.

They were supposed to have a revolution in military affairs where their new weapons systems would leave everyone else in the dust.
Well most of their new naval systems failed in varying degrees, and the air force sank everything into the F-35 which is a boondoggle.

The war in the Middle East would enable them to control oil and thus the global economy. Iraq and Iran. A war against North Korea would get them a foothold right next to China.

Except China is moving its civilian economy away from oil and what China needs it can get from Russia.

Their Middle Eastern wars took way longer than expected. Iraq got Saudi and Iranian funded insurgents fighting there both against US troops and against each other. So it was no proper stable platform to invade Iran. The resources sent to Afghanistan could not be used in North Korea.

China's military also developed much faster technologically than they expected. So now it turns out what advantage they had was eroded. Instead of increasing the gap further. Now they are behind in lots of sectors.

They are just pulling back, and will try to detach and contain China.

Remember the Art of War. First you destroy the enemy's alliances. Hence the operation near Venezuela, the strikes on Iran, or the war with Russia.
 
Last edited:

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Slighty old news but did you know Jack Ma is back at Alibaba?

Not in official capacity but that doesn't mean much since a lot of times in history, the person calling the shots doesn't make himself public.

Western and Indian media are gonna have to explain why he's back when last time I checked, they swore he was dead.

As for why he has returned. Something about getting Alibaba back on track especially in a time of AI.

Underwent 5 years of forced reeducation, coming soon to an American corporation near you!
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Does that mean Chinese are honorary Aryans now?
I’d say perception of China in the west is returning to pre 1840s, ie the land of mysticism, culture, sophistication and inspiring awe and envy and a desire to dominate as the Spanish hoped to invade China, as Europeans looked down on pagan Chinese yet prized their chinoiserie and porcelain. Go to any European royal museum and look at the priceless Chinese porcelain imported in the 1500~1600s.

@Chevalier
George Friedman is lying. It was all about maintaining the US as the sole superpower and containing China. The neocons in the US had plans to fight China since the early 2000s at least.

They were supposed to have a revolution in military affairs where their new weapons systems would leave everyone else in the dust.
Well most of their new naval systems failed in varying degrees, and the air force sank everything into the F-35 which is a boondoggle.

The war in the Middle East would enable them to control oil and thus the global economy. Iraq and Iran. A war against North Korea would get them a foothold right next to China.

Except China is moving its civilian economy away from oil and what China needs it can get from Russia.

Their Middle Eastern wars took way longer than expected. Iraq got Saudi and Iranian funded insurgents fighting there both against US troops and against each other. So it was no proper stable platform to invade Iran. The resources sent to Afghanistan could not be used in North Korea.

China's military also developed much faster technologically than they expected. So now it turns out what advantage they had was eroded. Instead of increasing the gap further. Now they are behind in lots of sectors.

They are just pulling back, and will try to detach and contain China.

Remember the Art of War. First you destroy the enemy's alliances. Hence the operation near Venezuela, the strikes on Iran, or the war with Russia.
The western consciousness never truly let go of their desire to dominate China and turn it into another Philippines, the problem is that once Anglo westerners could get Koreans and hong kongers to become willing slaves to white Anglo primacy, they believed they could do it to all of China, despite Chinese civilisation outlasting even the Persians and Egyptians. This is where you get the sense of entitlement that a lot of western tourists exhibit when in Asia that they would not exhibit in say Eastern Europe. Australians in Asia being a glaring example, and incidentally Anglo Australian intelligence was significant during the HK riots of 2019.

Underwent 5 years of forced reeducation, coming soon to an American corporation near you!
Ma needed to be spiritually cleansed for his paying homage to Anglo Zionism at their fabled wall in Jerusalem.
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
North America was once populated by East Asian looking mongoloid people; in a way North America is merely an extension of northern China and Siberia. Western colonialism in this context is no different than if western imperialists genocided Chinese around the Yangtze and Yellow rivers and populated it with their own Caucasian peoples. In fact Jack London wrote a story about this particular fantasy.


Chinese trolling of western supremacists on twitter is exquisite. This is another demonstration of psychological warfare, humiliating the enemy, no different to white westerners telling the whole world via their media how Asian men have small penises and how Asian men are asexual undesirable men and how white males are the pinnacle of sexual desirability.This is that “all of society” war kiron skinner was talking about.
 

supersnoop

Colonel
Registered Member
China is so competitive in the fields of renewable energy, after visiting China, these venture capitalists don't think it's feasible for western companies to invest in some of these sectors anymore.

Per article:
China's dominance in clean tech is attributed to its prioritization of energy security, willingness to let companies fail, and ability to rapidly onshore entire supply chains, making it challenging for Western companies to catch up.
So the socialist system is producing better capitalists?
I can't believe it's taken like 15 years for even business publications to realize that the accusations of "you don't protect IP!" can be alternatively interpreted as "don't rely on lawyers to make money!"

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
This article is all wrong. "DHS" should be "CCP", "Americans" should be "Uighurs"
Like this:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top