FriedRiceNSpice
Major
250 + (2 * x), where 90 <= x <= 120How many J-20s have been produced thus far? Wikipedia says only 250 but uses a source from July 2023
Last edited:
250 + (2 * x), where 90 <= x <= 120How many J-20s have been produced thus far? Wikipedia says only 250 but uses a source from July 2023
Think you meant 90 <= x <= 120250 + (2 * x), where 90 >= x >= 120
Thank you, I have corrected by post. Good catch.Think you meant 90 <= x <= 120
Is there a source for this?250 + (2 * x), where 90 <= x <= 120
What do you want the source to be? J-20 production rate is unknown, J-20 induction rate is unknown. If it was 250 two years ago. Even conservative estimates would place the current inventory to be around 400+. You can go back and scroll through Deino's twitter posts counting the tail numbers. But theres been massive opsec increases I believe. So even doing that is getting more difficult.Is there a source for this?
Good point. I was hoping there had been more OSINT estimates to draw on than a 2-year old sourceWhat do you want the source to be? J-20 production rate is unknown, J-20 induction rate is unknown. If it was 250 two years ago. Even conservative estimates would place the current inventory to be around 400+. You can go back and scroll through Deino's twitter posts counting the tail numbers. But theres been massive opsec increases I believe. So even doing that is getting more difficult.
It is very difficult. I guess people want someone like @Blitzo to update his assessment since he’s been the person behind most if not all quoted J-20 figures that are reputable (including even Wikipedia mentioned by others).What do you want the source to be? J-20 production rate is unknown, J-20 induction rate is unknown. If it was 250 two years ago. Even conservative estimates would place the current inventory to be around 400+. You can go back and scroll through Deino's twitter posts counting the tail numbers. But theres been massive opsec increases I believe. So even doing that is getting more difficult.
It is very difficult. I guess people want someone like @Blitzo to update his assessment since he’s been the person behind most if not all quoted J-20 figures that are reputable (including even Wikipedia mentioned by others).
The J-20s (as in all variants) were most definitely flying with them on.J-20, J-20A and J-20S in the parade were often flying without luneberg lens.
J-35s were flying with retractable LL.