Well, the US has its own internal issues thst they need to address to better compete with China and other developing countries this coming decades as the developing world keeps growing . So its bad thing to also focus internally. Of course that doesn't mean the US is abondoning its pax americans doctrine or commitment entirely, far from it. It will carry on with its presence and influence globally, but priority will be at home.
On another note, TRUMP doesnt seem to be ready to give India a break until India finally picks a side for once. Funny enough i am one of the few westerners who always believed India will be a long term threat to us as well in future just like China today, so i think Trump is not actually wrong to cut India to size and make them mske concessions now that the US is still far dominant in the relationship and has all the leverage to force her will/policy over India. Its not a bad move, and i dont think we should facilitate its rise, so unfortunately for India her rise wont go under the radar and ignorantly as China dif back from the 80s to 2010s. So it will face much more restrictions, obstruction and protectionism from the West. Some interesting points i highlited and found interesting in the article about what Trump administration chief trade/commerce officisl said about India. Shows you what Trump administration thinks about New Delhi which isnt entirely wrong and Indis will have to get used to this new normal. Lol
“They [India] are a vowel between Russia and China. If that’s who you want to be, go be it. But either support the dollar, support the US, support your biggest client, who is the American consumer, or, I guess you’re going to ban 50 per cent tariff,” he said.
"They [India] need to decide which side they want to be on. You know what’s funny is, remember the Chinese sell to us. The Indians sell to us. They’re not going to be able to sell to each other. We are the consumers of the world. People have to remember, it’s our $30 trillion economy that is the consumer of the world.
Lol