The Kashmir conflict 2025.

[neutralobserver]

Labeling Asim Munir a 'chad' feels like a surprisingly shallow take, even by the usual standards here. I would’ve expected a bit more critical engagement, especially considering how complex and controversial his role really is. He’s comparable to some of our own politicians who push religious rhetoric — the difference being that Munir operates with far more power and significantly greater capacity to actually implement his vision. That should invite scrutiny, not shallow praise. Please refrain from doing so.

Thanks, ChatGPT!

 

[Deleted member 34044]

Thanks, ChatGPT!

I am not quite upto the mark in English to match this forum members, so i make use of AI. I hope this does not concern you too much. If you want me too, I will stop its use.

 

[Randomuser]

Didn't this FighterHead user request earlier on for his account to be deleted coz he didn't want to be doxxed or some stuff?

And yet now all of a sudden he's back on this forum with such convenient timing. And using AI to do his posting for him too.

 

[Rafi]

Labeling Asim Munir a 'chad' feels like a surprisingly shallow take, even by the usual standards here. I would’ve expected a bit more critical engagement, especially considering how complex and controversial his role really is. He’s comparable to some of our own politicians who push religious rhetoric — the difference being that Munir operates with far more power and significantly greater capacity to actually implement his vision. That should invite scrutiny, not shallow praise. Please refrain from doing so.

all that long winded bs, in conclusion his force was the one that dominated that conflict, rather than analyse the shortcomings of the Indian armed forces, they come out with this cock and bull story that nobody believes, not even the people saying it.

 

[valysre]

You’re presenting a very simplistic and surface-level take on Indian defense affairs, with heavy assumptions based on what’s visible to the public — not what actually drives military institutions.


First, if senior IAF officials make bold claims, it’s fair to question them. But jumping from that to “mission planners and intel officers will become overconfident and doomed” is a leap. The Indian military doesn’t operate in a vacuum — it’s deeply influenced, and often constrained, by political and bureaucratic layers. What’s said in public is not always what’s believed or acted on internally. Remember this when talking about India, as every country and its military have different organisational structures and Public outreach.


Second, the claim that India “lied openly in 2019” ignores actual data. While the Balakot strikes didn’t come with flashy footage at the time, open-source satellite imagery (Planet Labs, Stratfor, IISS) later showed structural damage at the Jaish-e-Mohammed camp. You can debate effectiveness — but not whether a strike occurred.


Now in 2025, the IAF has released missile camera footage and post-strike satellite imagery. Yet again, it’s being dismissed as fake. So what’s the standard here — if India says it, it must be false? That’s not skepticism, that’s confirmation bias.


You also claim India will keep failing because it celebrates fake wins. If that logic held, 2025 should’ve been a disaster too. Instead, India conducted precision strikes with documented evidence, escalated carefully, and avoided wider conflict. Not exactly failure.


As for institutional reform: Pakistan outright denied its soldiers were even in Kargil in 1999. They left bodies unclaimed. Yet somehow, despite zero accountability, you argue Pakistan’s military improved as they performed in this conflict. Why? Because the real changes happened behind closed doors — not on Twitter, not in press conferences.


Same applies to India. Internal reforms, doctrinal shifts, procurement priorities — none of that plays out on social media. Public perception, for better or worse, doesn’t dictate operational evolution.


You’re looking for lies because you’ve already decided they exist — and now you’re just reverse-engineering the narrative to confirm that. Try looking a bit deeper.

Can you stop using ChatGPT to write your responses please? I think everyone will take you more seriously if you wrote using your own words.
Edit: I see other people have pointed it out as well. I would recommend using translation software (which is generally pretty good now). Using LLMs to write out your arguments only really makes it look like you yourself are incapable of the logic/thinking required to post.

 

[Deleted member 34044]

Didn't this FighterHead user request earlier on for his account to be deleted coz he didn't want to be doxxed or some stuff?

And yet now all of a sudden he's back on this forum with such convenient timing. And using AI to do his posting for him too.

I am stilll waiting for my account to be deleted. My friends still tease me for the interaction I had with the user Coolgod I believe. Well me and my workmates always troll each other so no hard feelings. Also, the guy who I stole this name from messages me everyday to delete this account but little does that kid know that you cant really do that on Forums like these so easily. Keep praying buddy, I know you read the messages I post here.

Btw, why are you so concerned about me being active again, I mean why does it matter to you as to how and where i devote my free time. This thread is not for talks like these, if you want we can discuss this somewhere else.

@valysre

Thanks for the advice. I understand how others may view me using AI for presenting my points. I will try to rely less on AI or other LLM and will put my points in my own words from now on.

 

[Randomuser]

I am stilll waiting for my account to be deleted. My friends still tease me for the interaction I had with the user Coolgod I believe. Well me and my workmates always troll each other so no hard feelings. Also, the guy who I stole this name from messages me everyday to delete this account but little does that kid know that you cant really do that on Forums like these so easily. Keep praying buddy, I know you read the messages I post here.

Btw, why are you so concerned about me being active again and using AI, I mean why does it matter to you as to how and where i devote my free time. This thread is not for talks like these, if you want we can discuss this somewhere else.

So in other words you are just here for trolling purposes. Maybe your wish will be granted soon by the mods.

 

[Deleted member 34044]

So in other words you are just here for trolling purposes. Maybe your wish will be granted soon by the mods.

I dont think I am here to necessarily troll. I am not making claims like India will crush China or the Rafales will smoke J-20 or the Tejas is the Raptor of the East. I am just presenting my points here like you guys do. If my points are wrong then I apologize, but to say that I am here to troll is not right, in my view that is.

Indeed, May the Admin delete this account.

 

[zyklon]

Assuming future doctrine will be shaped by Reddit pride posts is a massive stretch.

Public noise rarely leads defense reform in India. It's the institutions — not Reddit threads — that matter.

So are you implying that India — the "world's largest democracy" or so it claims — is in fact unresponsive to public sentiments, especially when they're communicated noisily via Reddit or other online platforms?

This wasn’t showboating. It was measured retaliation with operational clarity. War isn’t an airshow — it's about hitting the objective and pulling out before escalation traps spring, which in case can be called to have sprung with downing of Indian fighter jets.

If Operation Sindoor was not showboating, then why was the Indian government so desperate as to block ~8,000 X/Twitter accounts for the sake of domestic narrative control in the aftermath of the IAF's losses on May 7th?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920708170558661089

You’re just mistaking surface chatter for core strategy.
So what you’re doing is mistaking public messaging for internal doctrine. Thats simply not the case.
You’re mistaking the chatter for the calculus.

Misalignments between internal doctrine and public messaging erode institutional credibility, and India is a relatively low trust society as is.

He’s comparable to some of our own politicians who push religious rhetoric — the difference being that Munir operates with far more power and significantly greater capacity to actually implement his vision. That should invite scrutiny, not shallow praise. Please refrain from doing so.

If FM Asim Munir has significant capacity for "getting shit done," then he is effective and impactful enough to qualify as a chad regardless of whether you agree or disagree with his politics.

Btw, why are you so concerned about me being active again and using AI, I mean why does it matter to you as to how and where i devote my free time. This thread is not for talks like these, if you want we can discuss this somewhere else.

Your dependency on AI tells us you don't actually know what you're talking about . . .

 

[Faisal Iqbal]

The most sane person in Indian defence circle Pravin Sawhney, as usual shares his perspective on yesterday's press conference by IAF chief, A.P Singh.