US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

zyklon

Junior Member
Registered Member
Much of the crimes are just planned crime exports to control Mexico better.

You're too generous: the US government isn't organized enough for "planned crime exports," at least when it comes to countries as large, as populous, and as complicated as Mexico.

While America's fondness for mind altering substances precipitates criminality overseas, the outcomes in play are not exactly well planned, and far from fully controllable.

I wouldn't even call it "managed chaos" in this instance, so much as fighting fires with one hand while playing whack-a-mole with the other.

Heck Trump himself is already negotiating with Cartels for that cause, can you believe it.

Are you talking about ongoing collaboration between the DoJ and the Guzman faction of CDS, or something else?
 

4Tran

Junior Member
Registered Member
It all came crumbling down around the time Nixon came to power.
Nixon was bad, but he was nothing compared to how much damage Reagan caused. Just about every major bad trendline in the current US can be traced back to something that Reagan did. The really big military dip started at the same time as the fall of the Soviet Union. Who knew that winning the Cold War would do almost as much damage as losing it.
 

qwerty3173

Junior Member
Registered Member
You're too generous: the US government isn't organized enough for "planned crime exports," at least when it comes to countries as large, as populous, and as complicated as Mexico.

While America's fondness for mind altering substances precipitates criminality overseas, the outcomes in play are not exactly well planned, and far from fully controllable.

I wouldn't even call it "managed chaos" in this instance, so much as fighting fires with one hand while playing whack-a-mole with the other.



Are you talking about ongoing collaboration between the DoJ and the Guzman faction of CDS, or something else?
Yes, though I am not very knowledgeable about the details of the collaboration.
 

Lethe

Captain
The author of this
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
as well as the upcoming book
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
from which it was excerpted, Seth Harp, Esq. can at times get a little too cynical about the volume of organized crime prevailing through the branches of the DoD.

Unsurprisingly, Seth was a criminal prosecutor in Texas prior to turning to investigative journalism.


OTOH, broadly speaking, Seth is not "making shit up:" there is indeed a not insignificant amount of criminality within the ranks of the US military, even if it is generally speaking more petty and opportunistic than organized or conspiratorial. However, who wants to read about sketchy NCOs
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
?!

TBF, the US military is a reflection of broader American society: just as crime is unavoidably abundant in any American municipality of over a hundred thousand souls — let alone a city of a million — it's only natural that crime, including of the organized variety, would be found within
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

While some of you may find it easy — or easier than usual — to dismiss the US military wholesale after reading his new book or even just this excerpt, I encourage y'all to receive Seth's writing as a study into a lesser known, yet fascinating, if not inevitable facet of military society.

Archived copy:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I enjoyed Seth Harp's appearances on the War Nerd podcast:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(May 2022) and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(March 2023). I recall them touching on Seth's previous reporting including on Special Forces culture in at least one of those episodes. Not sure if either episode is available without subscription at those links, but I believe they can be found elsewhere too.
 

gpt

Junior Member
Registered Member

Rocket Lab's
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
was introduced this year to conduct hypersonic flight testing, with average flight cost depending on payload to be around
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Two flights have been conducted. Cadence looks to be 1 per month so far.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

1753799082730.png

Rocket Lab is launching a suborbital mission, JAKE 4, on its Hypersonic Accelerator Suborbital Test Electron (HASTE) testbed on July 30 at 9:45 PM EDT (1:45 UTC). The launch will take place from Rocket Lab’s Launch Complex 2 (LC-2) at Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia. HASTE is a suborbital variant of Electron that will not reach orbit. The payload for this mission is a highly secretive government payload.

JAKE 4 is believed to be a hypersonic reentry missile. This missile is thought to be equipped with an air-breathing engine, allowing it to maneuver accurately to its target, whether on land or in the air. Rocket Lab has completed three HASTE missions to date, demonstrating a growing market demand for launching payloads to suborbital space at hypersonic speeds.
 

SlothmanAllen

Senior Member
Registered Member
JAKE 4 is believed to be a hypersonic reentry missile. This missile is thought to be equipped with an air-breathing engine, allowing it to maneuver accurately to its target, whether on land or in the air. Rocket Lab has completed three HASTE missions to date, demonstrating a growing market demand for launching payloads to suborbital space at hypersonic speeds.
That is interesting. I doubt we will ever learn much about the vehicle, but I wonder if it is some sort of scramjet or some sort of combined cycle type?
 

SlothmanAllen

Senior Member
Registered Member
Seems like Anduril won big support from the state of Ohio with investment of $310 million to build their Arsenal 1 factory near Columbus. The factory will be nearly 5 million sq. ft. when complete and employ around 4,000 people.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The deal calls for Costa Mesa, California-based Anduril to create 4,008 new jobs and more than $530 million in new payroll and to make at least $910.5 million in capital investment within the next 10 years in order to receive the funds. It must then maintain those commitments over the ensuing two decades under the plan.

I don't know if Anduril will be able to transition to a successful company long term. Building military grade hardware is tough and not something that just happens overnight. Palmer Lucky (CEO) has been sniping at many US defense "Primes" for a while now, but he really doesn't have much to show for it. Transitioning Andruil from some neat tech demos and YouTube videos is going to take a lot of hard work.
 

zyklon

Junior Member
Registered Member
I enjoyed Seth Harp's appearances on the War Nerd podcast:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(May 2022) and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(March 2023). I recall them touching on Seth's previous reporting including on Special Forces culture in at least one of those episodes. Not sure if either episode is available without subscription at those links, but I believe they can be found elsewhere too.

Thank you for sharing, @Lethe!

Not familiar with the War Nerd podcast, but did read Seth Harp's July 2022 Harper's Magazine piece — on the Russo-Ukrainian War in general and the first wave of pro-Kyiv foreign volunteers in particular —
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which presumably echoes
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(May 2022), as both were products of his spring 2022 visit to Ukraine.

Seth's piece was generally speaking reasonably fair, if not comical in its assessments of (would be) foreign volunteers who raised their hands upon the conflict's transformation into a full spectrum war in 2022:
The volunteers I spoke to mostly struck me as clueless or delusional, with no real connection to the armed forces
In Kyiv, he had met with a group of about sixteen legionnaires at a hotel on Peremohy Square. “Saddest group you’ll ever see,” he told me, “a clown car of misfits.” “The entire thing was an ill-conceived ploy to internationalize the conflict in the press,” he added.
One hopeful, who said that he could do push-ups and “used to go every month or two to a shooting club,” wanted to know whether the Ukrainian military would provide housing with private bathrooms, and whether he could bring his pet turtle. “You’ll sleep in a hole in the ground. You’ll probably die in a hole,” another user replied. “You can bring your pet turtle. . . . He’ll probably die with you.”

However, as Seth observed, there was also a minority of foreign veterans turned volunteers who were on average more suited for the rigors and realities of combat, even if they were typically older. Yet at the same time, these guys were potentially problematic in less immediately visible ways:
The volunteers were being housed at various locations around Lviv and Kyiv, and few had weapons, body armor, or helmets. There were a few highly experienced veterans at the front, he said, but that was it.
Those who were veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan, a cohort now entering or well into middle age, might have felt the possibility of renewed relevance and the old thrill of being at the center of world events. Many of them are still in Ukraine, looking for something—anything—to do.

I dare say that this demographic of foreign volunteers or more precisely a portion thereof — specifically the hardened foreign fighters who continued to make contact on Line Zero, if not
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, especially after all illusions and delusions concerning the war
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
— are not all that different from the soldiers and operators turned gangsters and traffickers chronicled in Seth's new book,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

What these two demographics have in common is that they both exemplify Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs:
Astriata-Maslow-Post.png

Soldiers, especially elite infantrymen and operators — who are considered among the best at their craft — find purpose, if not self-actualization in warfighting, and if we're to be blunt about it, in violence.

This is not a criticism, but an objective truth: just about everyone enjoys doing what they're good at — especially if they're being paid for it — including a certain variety of professional warfighters who've dedicated years, if not a decade or two of their lives to blowing shit up and killing people.

However, if you're a pipe hitter facing few(er), if any opportunities for making good use of your craft — perhaps as a result of disciplinary issues, conflicts with superiors, the mental tolls of war, the withdrawal of forces, struggles with substance abuse, peace and reconciliation, and/or the defaults of career progression — what do you do and where do you go?

Not to say SOF units in general or SOCOM units in particular are manned by "psychopathic killers," but due to a mix of both nature and nurture, they do draw and cultivate certain "types of personalities" that may be easily conflated with any number of tropes.

The overwhelming majority of these guys will find something relatively peaceful to keep busy with after their service, move on to law enforcement, or find themselves elsewhere in or adjacent to the government.

However, there will inevitably be a few who will decide to "go out of their way" or even "bend the rules" in the relentless pursuit for belonging, esteem, purpose and self-actualization.
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Need some clarification on this podcast


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


What the hell General John Norman was talking about? What targets have the AIM-120 have used against? Houthi, Iranian and Russian drones? I don't think Ukrainian F-16 has shot down any Russian fighters, nor did Pakistani's against Indian ones. F/A-18 used AIM-120 against an Iraqi fighter (Su-25?) in Iraq and missed.

Heather “Lucky” Penney: So I really like what you said about sharing best practices and knowledge of engineering and manufacturing across the whole Raytheon portfolio, because in that way, you know, a rising tide lifts all boats. I’m curious, since we last checked in, there’s been a significant increase in operational use of the AMRAAM and other Raytheon effectors.

So what have you learned about war gaming and product capability in recent years?

Maj. Gen. (Ret.) John Norman: Well, I think it’s a good lesson learned as we look at the mass challenge that the US government has placed upon industry, both, both the traditional defense crimes and all the new starts. [00:25:00] Reliability does matter a lot.

When you look across some of the conflicts that have occurred recently, we’ve employed AMRAAMs that are 20- 30 years old and they worked every single time. We’re seeing probability of hit, probability of kill, significantly higher than was predicted.

Heather “Lucky” Penney: Really?

Maj. Gen. (Ret.) John Norman: With these older weapons.

Heather “Lucky” Penney: Okay.

Maj. Gen. (Ret.) John Norman: Yeah. And I, I think a lot of it is when we look at probability of kill.

It’s, across all cases, not just the heart of the envelope, but the very, very edge cases against, you know, significant counter measures. The preponderance of the shots that, that have been taken recently.

They’re very much within the heart part of the, the weapons envelope. Okay. And that reliability that’s built in because of, of the partnership between the Department of Defense and industry that’s built into a weapon like AMRAAM it’s paid off significantly because we’ve been able to use very, very old AMRAAMs and they work right the first time, every time.[00:26:00]

So the users on the ground have significant confidence in the weapon. And then the, aviation crews, the pilots and, The weapon systems operators, they’re employing these from error. They have significant confidence because they’re working every single time. So as, as we look at affordable munitions, low cost support affordable munitions, they need to have the capability to survive to the target. They need to have the capability to be integrated with the platform so that it’s easy for the aircrew to use them and they need to be reliable so that when you hit the weapons release button, you hit the Pickle button, it works every single time. I think you, I think all of us would find it very uncomfortable to go into combat and be in a position where it could be your life against your adversary’s life, and you hit the pickle button and the weapon doesn’t work. And so that’s what we’re trying to, we’re trying to avoid and we’re trying to work very, very closely with the Department of [00:27:00] Defense as as we look at these low cost, affordable mass munitions, so that we build that capability into it, and that’s part of the requirement. It’s gonna be a balance because the more technology that you add, the more survivability that you add, the more performance capability that you add, whether it’s speed or range, the more expensive that munition becomes. And so through modeling and simulation, we’re able to show them how adding or taking away certain capabilities or performance measures of a munition, how it affects both costs, it affects both manufacturability and most importantly, how it affects the weapons effect. From performance and reliability.
 
Last edited:
Top