Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
This is the US goal for them, the longer the US waits the stronger China gets and the more likely the US might lose. But luckily China is smart and not going to war unless a major redline is crossed
China won’t go to war over sanctions and an embargo with China would severely hurt the US economy
True but without the Russian's massive Operation August Storm to dislodge and destroy and evict the Imperial Japanese Forces plus their large civilian/political infrastructure set in place for nearly 50 years -it would be impossible for China at that time to do so and the real danger of a permanent Japanese colony of military men settling in Manchuria/Korea /even Philippines with Japanese /local women and becoming "nicer peaceful"settlers was a distinct danger for a nascent China which still had to fight the Chinese Civil War.
The US had never stopped trying to provoke an armed conflict in the Taiwan Straits since the 1990s. China had been better at managing conflict escalation than many countries.
....
...
...
Last edited:
plawolf
Lieutenant General
Using monetary values to measure industrial output is fundamentally flawed because that equates price to quantity.
A bullet is a bullet in a war. An American made bullet that costs 10-100 times as much as a Chinese made bullet does not give America 10-100 more firepower in a firefight as a monetary comparison would suggest.
To do a proper like for like comparison would be impossible without a stupidly complex analysis of core strategic industries with direct wartime application.
But you can do some basic comparisons with easily available statistics. This is why the ship tonnage figures are so much more relevant than value added.
Similar comparison of things like car production, steel tonnage production, electricity generation and consumption, solar installation, industrial robot installations, the picture is consistent and overwhelming in just how dominant Chinese manufacturing prowess is.
And that is still underestimating Chinese industrial potential. Because even in fields like civilian aviation that the US has a dominating lead in terms of units output, if you drill down to components, you will find that Chinese suppliers play a massive role.
Accdg to this douyin news, the indian claim of Highly willing to transfer tech and small shareholdong, was "not true" accdg to Highly. See attached snapshot.google translated.
...
Subject article from india(?)
....
Though highly seem to have plant in lndia?
...
lndia seem to be promoting this narrative
...
Subject article from india(?)
....
Though highly seem to have plant in lndia?
...
lndia seem to be promoting this narrative
Attachments
-
Screenshot_20250624_223312.jpg
Last edited: