The Kashmir conflict 2025.

Sinnavuuty

Captain
Registered Member
Can someone compile footage of each wreckage site and the likely aircraft it belongs to?

I think the most conclusively convincing evidence we have is of the Rafale.
Here:

You can search for the evidence yourself on Twitter and group it together. I won't do that because it would take up too much of my time.
 

bsdnf

Junior Member
Registered Member

Ringsword

Junior Member
Registered Member
Regarding the explosions over India on the night of the 7th and the early morning of the 8th, the various parties said:

Initially, the Pakistani media reported that it was an attack by the Pakistani military

Then the Indian media said it was an Indian military exercise

Now the Indian Ministry of Defense says it was an attack by Pakistan

But Pakistani officials said they have not launched any attacks on India

what a cognitive warfare
More like cognitive dissonance warfare-the amount of BS,chest thumping,outright lies is mind boggling
 

Tomboy

Junior Member
Registered Member
Still the same problem, I can't believe that this is the 6X6 truck chassis of HQ-16, let alone the 8X8 truck chassis of HQ-9

And whether this is HQ-16 or HQ-9, Indian osints should discuss a conclusion first
Maybe they took out a radar vehicle?
Type-305B.CN.camo-001.jpg
Press can be misreporting a radar vehicle or ancillary vehicle as a "HQ-9 Battery" happened alot with the Ukraine war where press initially reported destroyed IFVs as MBTs
 

enroger

Senior Member
Registered Member
Maybe they took out a radar vehicle?
View attachment 151612
Press can be misreporting a radar vehicle or ancillary vehicle as a "HQ-9 Battery" happened alot with the Ukraine war where press initially reported destroyed IFVs as MBTs

Herops is supposed to go after radiation source so if they hit something it should be radar, but the photo is not conclusive for me
 

bsdnf

Junior Member
Registered Member
Maybe they took out a radar vehicle?
View attachment 151612
Press can be misreporting a radar vehicle or ancillary vehicle as a "HQ-9 Battery" happened alot with the Ukraine war where press initially reported destroyed IFVs as MBTs
This is not a problem of "radar vehicle" or "auxiliary vehicle", this low, narrow axle doesn't look like a heavy truck. More like a conversion from a light truck.
GqaK1RnXgAAyOQ-.jpg
 

zyklon

Junior Member
Registered Member
Can someone compile footage of each wreckage site and the likely aircraft it belongs to?

I think the most conclusively convincing evidence we have is of the Rafale.

Take a look at my post from earlier concerning the wreckages and reported wreckages in:
  1. Akalia Kalan Village, Bathinda District, Punjab
  2. Wuyan Village, Pampore Town, Pulwama District, Jammu & Kashmir
  3. Ramban District, Jammu & Kashmir
  4. Akhnoor Municipal Committee, Jammu District, Jammu & Kashmir
So far, it appears last night the IAF lost:



1 x Dassault Rafale in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(nearly certain)




1 x Dassault Mirage 2000 in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(fairly likely)


This wreckage was likely initially misidentified by certain Indian sources as a PAF JF-17.





1 x Russian made fighter equipped with one or two Zvezda K-36 ejection seat(s) in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(possible)

This claimed loss can be reasonably upgraded to fairly likely if the photos below are authentic and were indeed captured in Ramban in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor (assuming the ejection seat is indeed a Zvezda K-36 as claimed).


Question is: was this an IAF Su-30MKI or MiG-29UPG airframe?



Therefore, as of this moment, I'm counting what's likely two (2), possibly at least three (3) IAF airframe losses from Operation Sindoor.

Keep in mind these losses could have been a result of a mix of hostile fire, friendly fire, pilot error, and/or mechanical failure, but combat conditions were likely a factor in all of the attrition.



There's been claims that one additional airframe, which some have claimed to be an IAF Su-30MKI or a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, was lost in Akhnoor Municipal Committee, Jammu District, Jammu & Kashmir.

However, besides
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which contained
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
taken from a distance, there hasn't been much reporting on the airframe that was reportedly lost in Akhnoor.

Has anyone come across more definitive evidence confirming the loss of a Su-30MKI or any other airframe in Akhnoor?

As well as @bsdnf's post containing footage of the wreckage in Akhnoor:
Two Russian fighter jets, one Su-30MKI in Jammu and one unknown in Ramban

And the official website of Martin-Baker, is still skipping the numbers 7785, 7786 and 7787. The Pakistan Air Force’s announcement of shooting down five fighter jet may be real

Local report about Su-30MKI crashed in Jammu

You may also want to review @Sinnavuuty's list of reported wreckages:
A summary of what we have seen so far:

Akhnoor (Indian Kashmir) - less than 8 km from the border
Fighter: Unknown
Evidence: Footage of an aircraft on fire recorded by Reuters

Ramban (Indian Kashmir) - more than 80 km from the border
Fighter: likely Su-30MKI or MiG-29
Evidence: Footage of a K-36DM injection seat from a Su-30MKI or MiG-29

Pampore (Indian Kashmir) - 60 km from the border
Fighter: very likely Mirage
Evidence: 19-minute footage of the aircraft showing the nose of the aircraft beyond the engine

Bathinda (Punjab) - more than 90 km from the border
Fighter: an Indian Rafale
Evidence: Photos of the aircraft's pylon with a MICA, the image of the M88 engine and a third piece of evidence being the Rafale's vertical stabilizer recorded by images

Another piece of evidence is:
Hoshiarpur (Punjab) - more than 90 km from the border
Object: Found wreckage of PL-15E

And:
The drone that was shot down in Pakistan.

Did I forget something?

These posts don't reference footage for each and every wreckage, but there should be enough information and URLs to get you started with finding the footage and answers you're interested in yourself.

If you're too lazy to search for and verify the footage and photos yourself, you can wait a few days or a few weeks: someone will inevitably compile what you're looking for, but factual accuracy will inevitably depend on their perspective and agenda.
 
Top