A while back this site was being offered on sale.... to be sold...Or Chongqing hotpot stirrers, those inciters. They do not want the camaraderie between China and Russia.
And word is the servers are in London....
A while back this site was being offered on sale.... to be sold...Or Chongqing hotpot stirrers, those inciters. They do not want the camaraderie between China and Russia.
Australia and New zealand would be just as easily assimilated into China proper considering the low population of both islands. You would only need about 50 million Chinese to settle and inhabit Australia to outnumber the anglo population 2:1, not counting the 10% who are Chinese/Asian heritage. High speed rail connecting China to Australia via ASEAN and Indonesia could be done, just as the Chinese once proposed HSR from China to California via Alaska and Canada.Technically Qing lost those lands due to Imperial Russia and the Soviets also. Those lands are also harder to pacify and objectively less valuable, also China doesn't want to absorb more foreign population.
Outer Manchuria and Outer Mongolia can integrate with the rest of China relatively easily.
Literally all answer post is based in Western propaganda and wrong view of the world.Couldn't care less what a politician like Putin says in public while on an official state visit to China when he's desperate for support from the only economic lifeline he has left. I've browsed Russian geopolitics subs/social media in the past and they've never viewed China/Chinese people favorably before the war and I'm wondering why there's so many Russian simps in Chinese boards. Again, Russia is only using China as a partner of last resort because they've been shunned by the West due to their war of territorial expansion. China should view this relationship as a quid pro quo just like how Russians view it. If Russia can get back with the West while keeping Ukrainian territory even if it means enmity with China, I'm sure they would do it in a heartbeat.
Iranians don't like China for some f..d up reason(s).First of all, I like how lightly colored the ROC is on the second chart; shows we still got some brothers over there worth not killing.
Secondly, is Iran out of their mother f'ing minds? They are unsavable if this shit is true. What hope is there when one cannot even differentiate friend from foe while currently under attack?? Never thought I'd see a real world rendition of a Pokemon becoming confused and hitting itself in its confusion.
Because most of the survey participants (Iranians) have for the most part a very WESTERN CENTRIC VIEW OF THEMSELVES hence the unsurprising result on this survey.Iran also has net positive perceptions of the US and EU and net negative perception of Russia.
That's not it. US and Europe vote against Iran in the UN much more than China and Russia, yet Iranians view US and EU positively and view China and Russia negatively.
I think this is a likely contributing factor. Iranians really don't like their government and political system.
View attachment 129957
when Russia spend huge amount on Sochi it barely had 400K population and no commercial port or natural resources and cut off by mountains. Now they are developing Arctic /Pacific and you think to reach up North and East they will not made any cities in the middle? when the likely hood of resources extraction get higher and above all it has Arab interest. The problem is you are challenging the combine wisdom of Gulf Royals and Russia regarding North Pole. look at this historic picture.
It is better to collect all Muslims in front of Arabs. this Orthodox church is complete failure.
But Iranians are nothing but dimwits and nitwits for them not to fully consider or place the economic condition of their country from the massive economic sanctions Iran has been subjected with since the theocratic government took power. Unless, they can name a single country that's swimming ECONOMICALLY that faced similar levels of sanctions then they can rightfully deserving of their complaints. But such a country has yet to exist (Russia's ECON future remains to be seen for us to have an objective view of its wealth standing).Iran economy is shit so public acceptance of its political system, alignment, values, diplomacy etc are also at low levels.
All politics is local. If your government is incompetent, why would the public support it.
This "White Iranian-Amerixican" begs to differ.I see Iranians the same fool as Russians who park their money in Euro to bet against sanctions. White power and what not. Lucky for us, American elites are unredeemably racist. If Russians are not white enough, definitely not Iranians. We just have to be patient and let Iran have its own Ukraine as a wake up call. A wake up call that is so irredeemably brutal that they have no choice but to comepletely purge its treacherous elements. Lets hope they can become the next Russia.

But Iranians are nothing but dimwits and nitwits for them not to fully consider or place the economic condition of their country from the massive economic sanctions Iran has been subjected with since the theocratic government took power. Unless, they can name a single country that's swimming ECONOMICALLY that faced similar levels of sanctions then they can rightfully deserving of their complaints. But such a country has yet to exist (Russia's ECON future remains to be seen for us to have an objective view of its wealth standing).
They (Iranians) in my opinion largely run from their historical evidence of greatness and revisionist coloured glasses look at their most recent contemporary history under the Shah of Iran as if it was the time of modernity and economic vibrancy. When the actual data and situation on the ground couldn't be starker from the truth, hence, the eventual toppling of the regime easily replaced by the Ayatollah without an actual push and support from any outside power(s) unlike that of the deposed Shah.
He is of (paternal line) and (maternal line) descent.
Blinken lobbies for striking Russia – NYT
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken is pushing the administration of President Joe Biden to allow Ukraine to attack targets deep inside Russia with American weapons, the New York Times reported on Thursday, referring to unnamed US officials.
The ban, according to the White House, was imposed out of concern that if US arms were used inside what Washington acknowledges as Russian territory it would trigger an escalation and potentially World War III. Blinken has been advocating for scrapping the restriction after making a “sobering”visit to Kiev earlier this month, the newspaper said, citing insider sources.
Ukrainian officials have claimed that being unable to target Russian forces across the border with American weapons led to the failure of its troops to prevent the recent Russian advances in Kharkov Region.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has said that the offensive is a response to months of Ukrainian artillery and drone attacks in Russia’s Belgorod Region and that a buffer zone is required to deprive Kiev of the capability to make such strikes. The Times said that Ukrainian weapons “don’t pack the power and speed of the American weapons.”
Kiev has launched a lobbying campaign on Capitol Hill to pressure the White House over the issue and has some allies among lawmakers. A group of representatives signed a letter to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin on Monday calling for the Ukrainian request to be granted.
During a hearing in Congress on Tuesday, Senator Michael McCaul displayed a map showing the strike range of ATACMS missiles – a weapon the US has donated to Ukraine – if Kiev were allowed to use them inside Russia. He called the outlined territory a “sanctuary zone” for Russian troops and accused the Biden administration of tying the hands of the Ukrainians behind their backs.
Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky has urged increased NATO involvement in the conflict and has argued that the West should not fear Russia’s reaction. Moscow believes that Zelensky’s goal is to trigger an escalation to maintain his position.
Russia is currently conducting a military drill to test its capability to use non-strategic nuclear weapons, which Putin ordered in response to hostile rhetoric by Western officials. One such remark identified by Moscow came from British Foreign Secretary David Cameron, who said earlier this month that Kiev “has the right” to use weapons donated by his nation to attack targets inside Russia.