Miscellaneous News

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Why in the world did they not use a Chinese-American to translate for Blinken instead of a white-American that fumbled the translation. Don't tell me they only have that one Chinese-American lady (who tends to dye her hair purple) to do the translation for the entire state dept? Are there not enough Hanjians?

Can’t have a Chinese spy if none of them are Chinese. *taps head* - China hawks probably.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier

Why in the world did they not use a Chinese-American to translate for Blinken instead of a white-American that fumbled the translation. Don't tell me they only have that one Chinese-American lady (who tends to dye her hair purple) to do the translation for the entire state dept? Are there not enough Hanjians?
They wanna see how much it takes before they can hear Xi speak English. At first, it's just him grimacing, going, "What?" Finally, he explodes, "No you idiot! Your Chinese is horrible! What kind of translation is that? I said ji(1)ji(2) first tone, second tone; it means to do so enthusiastically! I didn't say it with first tone first tone; I didn't say his penis did it!"
 

Phead128

Major
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Yes, Korean attitudes towards China has also gotten much worse as a result. It's very sad to see blood brothers feuding with each other. Being the bigger nation, China should be proactive in promoting Chinese Korean cooperation and goodwill. An independent Korean peninsula outside of US influence would be to the benefit of both peoples. Chinese people should be more sensitive to Korean nationalism and avoid stupid shit like claiming Goguryeo is not Korean history or getting mad over who invented irrelevant ancient shit like zongzi and hanfu. It is more important to focus the big picture.
Probably takes war to get South Korea out of US sphere of influence and alliance system.
 

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member
Probably takes war to get South Korea out of US sphere of influence and alliance system.
The West got into east asia via war, violence and exploitation, and China was only freed from western exploitation with war. Revolution, as Mao once said, is not a dinner party/picnic. It was only the threat of violence that really got the British to leave hong kong, and to be perfectly honest, it will take violence to remove anglo power from east Asia just as it took violence to remove anglo power from Afghanistan.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China isn't just a threat to US military power, but also ideologically to the bedrock of anglo-zionist capitalism. Why was Huawei particularly targeted by Anglos? It wasn't just because of its tech and market brilliance, but also beccause its worker cooperative structure threatens the very power structure by which anglo zionists use to control companies and countries' own national champions. The success of Huawei and companies with Huawei's structure ie Chinese companies is going to put pressure on american and Atlanticist companies when trade unions in the West can look to China and demand representation and a bigger share of the profits. That's the reason why long term, the US is going to war with China, it can't afford to give up power to its own workers.
 

horse

Brigadier
Registered Member
Anyone here with Econ degree and financial degree dare to explain the significance of this plan?

1. My guess is this is an attempt at the blockchain to do a digitalized currency. Tokens are the things of the blockchain I think.

2. Notice the trick here, that the United States does not want to do this blockchain alone, they want others to tag alone. This is the United States attempt to not have others run away from using the US Dollar.

3. Not sure if that is possible. Once the Euro currency came out, Europe started using it for trade. Once the blockchain is set up, then two countries change exchange money in whatever currency they like.

4. They are playing catch up to others. They are not leaders in this development, those central banks, just followers or laggards.
 
Top