Blackstone
Brigadier
Any more on what the Chinese pilots thought underwhelming on the Su-35?
Chinese purchase of Su-35
- Thread starter flyzies
- Start date
@Blackstone
Checked it again it says multiple system of SU-35 including engine has inferior stability compare to J-16. Also SU-35 perform badly on battlefield under information integrated condition thus determined not suit for modern warfare.
Also the rumor mentioned S-400 has been test fired in a northwestern base and the accuracy "didn't met expectation". This plus improved HQ-9 now have 300km range makes PLA think S-400 is "not necessary".
Basically if the rumor is true the whole sino-russia military export saga is busted.
Checked it again it says multiple system of SU-35 including engine has inferior stability compare to J-16. Also SU-35 perform badly on battlefield under information integrated condition thus determined not suit for modern warfare.
Also the rumor mentioned S-400 has been test fired in a northwestern base and the accuracy "didn't met expectation". This plus improved HQ-9 now have 300km range makes PLA think S-400 is "not necessary".
Basically if the rumor is true the whole sino-russia military export saga is busted.
SinoSoldier
Colonel
Was there any further information regarding the 300-km-ranged HQ-9? Thanks.
I think thetype 305a acquisition radar of hq-9 was always aesa, so I assume they are talking about the onboard terminal guidance using an aesa seeker or maybe an area engagement radar.
Thanks for the information. Will be interesting to how this pans out
Which browser are you using? Chrome sometimes has issues, Firefox works better for this forum for some reason
