Aircraft Carriers III

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Allegedly they are still going to upgrade the electrical and electronic systems as is. You can do that even if the ship is just berthed to port. Given that they were going to float it out, I would suspect that most of the work on the lower hull and the turbine installation had been completed already by the time of the accident.
So what would remain would be fixing the deck after the accident. Assuming the accident did not cause further internal damage to the structure.

We might still see it available in the next 5 years but I would not bet on it. It might even be mothballed.
 

Obi Wan Russell

Jedi Master
VIP Professional
QE in Norfolk once more; 200 of her sailors were hosted aboard USS Abraham Lincoln (with whom I coincidentally share a birthday, the man not the carrier!) for Thanksgiving:46710874_10157231774067448_7177100886617882624_n.jpg 46792296_10157231774137448_5278368137945808896_n.jpg RFA Tidespring was there too:46522705_10157231774092448_3894562523084488704_n.jpg 46933386_10157231774187448_1872272524608274432_n.jpg Next they'll be heading back across the pond for Christmas leave.
 
I add Jun 16, 2017
just not to forget Apr 2, 2015
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/aircraft-carriers-ii-closed-to-posting.t3125/page-534#post-334315


the assertion (not mine, but it doesn't matter) was the Fords had too short deck in the sense
aircraft would be so heavy (assuming enough ordnance/fuel) they would need rather high takeoff speed, and the shorter the deck, the higher acceleration to achieve that takeoff speed
(the argument was related to suggesting either too low ordnance/fuel, or too high force needed, with obvious drawbacks)

(oops, thought I was editing the post right above)
 

Timmymagic

New Member
Registered Member
could be interesting to see exactly how it works

You'll probably not get the opportunity. The images seen up to this point of the HMWHS when the ship was being built will likely be the last we'll ever see. The RN never publishes pictures or video of operational ships magazines.

Slide 21 on the powerpoint here is as close as we'll get in her service life to see what the magazine and weapons prep areas look like.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Anlsvrthng

Captain
Registered Member
The thick black smoke from the Admiral Kuznetsov comes from mazut oil and poor quality piping. Seems like China is doing better with the Liaoning I don't remember seeing too many pictures of a smokey Liaoning. But if it still uses the original boilers it will still have to burn mazut oil. It may come down to better piping, better regulation of oil flow and mayby higher quality oil.



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The Liaoning has the same Ukrainian built boilers like the Kuznetsov.
By the guy who managed it from Ukraine the propulsion system was in place , they just didn't had the manning/skills to use it .


So, the difference in the smoke more likely contributed to the different oil grade, and due to the face the Liaoning seen less usage since 90s than the Kuznetsov , so the boilers are in better shape.
 
Top