Ehm, seeing Block 15 MLUs get humiliated by Su-35/Mig-31 with R-37Ms would not surprise anyone, not even the most hardcore NAFO guys and I doubt it'd even have an effect on 2nd hand F-16 sales, much less on Vipers.
Those F-16s are going to be given to hunt cruise missiles with AIM-120Bs and occasionally attack into the Russian heartland with long range CMs and surprise attacks, essentially doing the same tasks as Mig-29 and Su-24. Ukraine is the underdog here and they continue to humiliate Russia two years into the war, even you can admit this.
Just replenish numbers if they can have enough...I doubt it. At this rate, L-39 would have been enough to lobe small diameter bombs. Don't know if they have used them for something or they have been carpet bombed on the ground.I don't really see what F-16s would add over Su-24s when it comes to cruise missiles tbh. Am I missing something?
You gotta consider how large it's user base is. European F-16s (and maybe the ones in the AMARG as well?) that are being replaced by F-35s can be transfered to Ukraine along with their AMRAAM B stocks. Even A/Bs with MLU are still capable enough aircraft and they can haul pretty much any NATO equipment the Ukranians can get their hands on.I don't really see what F-16s would add over Su-24s when it comes to cruise missiles tbh. Am I missing something?
1. It could be nothing more than political symbolism and a stall to negotiations, maybe even to convince the Western public into shelling more more money.I don't really see what F-16s would add over Su-24s when it comes to cruise missiles tbh. Am I missing something?
There arent that many left that are in good enough condition to not be a bigger threat to it's own pilots than to the Ruzzians.You gotta consider how large it's user base is. European F-16s (and maybe the ones in the AMARG as well?) that are being replaced by F-35s can be transfered to Ukraine along with their AMRAAM B stocks. Even A/Bs with MLU are still capable enough aircraft and they can haul pretty much any NATO equipment the Ukranians can get their hands on.
They are basically the same as a minimally upgraded MiG-29 with the R-77. Similar to the MiG-29BMs that Belarus operates.You gotta consider how large it's user base is. European F-16s (and maybe the ones in the AMARG as well?) that are being replaced by F-35s can be transfered to Ukraine along with their AMRAAM B stocks. Even A/Bs with MLU are still capable enough aircraft and they can haul pretty much any NATO equipment the Ukranians can get their hands on.
The Russians have already warned about this.3. Since the F-16s are capable of launching nukes, it could be a way to bait the Russians into overreacting or overextending themselves.
I think this is highly likely. But it will also collapse F-16 sales when they start getting dropped like flies. The F-16 is still a major money maker for the US because not all countries can buy the F-35 even if they want to. More sales for the Rafale I guess. Maybe even for the J-10.4. It could be a way for the US to sell more F-35 fighters by depleting the F-16 inventory of the countries that will hand these planes over to Ukraine.
Yeah. It is what they have left to send basically. That and a gazillion M113 and M2s.5. Maybe the West can't give anything else.
F-16 has significance of able to utilize US weapon stockpile.1. It could be nothing more than political symbolism and a stall to negotiations, maybe even to convince the Western public into shelling more more money.
2. It could also be an attempt to widen the conflict by having the F-16s take off from outside of Ukraine, maybe Poland, Moldova etc.
3. Since the F-16s are capable of launching nukes, it could be a way to bait the Russians into overreacting or overextending themselves.
4. It could be a way for the US to sell more F-35 fighters by depleting the F-16 inventory of the countries that will hand these planes over to Ukraine.
5. Maybe the West can't give anything else.