Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Aatmanirbhar Bharat. Jai Hind!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Indian Army to stop importing ammunition by the next financial year. Finally! Jai Hind!

This is actually very good progress. They are not only becoming self-sufficient in ammunition production but are also exporting to Ukraine. This puts them ahead of many NATO states.
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
This is actually very good progress. They are not only becoming self-sufficient in ammunition production but are also exporting to Ukraine. This puts them ahead of many NATO states.
LOL! I don't know if India dares to continue exporting ammunition to Ukraine. What would Russia have to say about that?

But India will have no qualms about exporting ammunition to Israel. Adani is already in a JV with Elbit to produce Hermes 900 drones and then exporting some back to Israel.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Ukraine, Gaza, and Armenia. India has been busy trying to profit from these hotspots. So much for being a "peace-loving country" as Rajnath Singh once said.
 
Last edited:

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
LOL! I don't know if India dares to continue exporting ammunition to Ukraine. What would Russia have to say about that?

But India will have no qualms about exporting ammunition to Israel. Adani is already in a JV with Elbit to produce Hermes 900 drones and then exporting some back to Israel.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Ukraine, Gaza, and Armenia. India has been busy trying to profit from these hotspots. So much for being a "peace-loving country" as Rajnath Singh once said.
It's just geoeconomics and geopolitics. There's no time for morality in great power competition, never had been and never will be.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
JAI HIND! JAI ABSO-FVCKING-LUTELY HIND!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


From actual (retired) senior military officials, no less.

Talking big is very easy, especially when the Indian Navy doesn't even have enough AEGIS-equivalent DDGs and FFGs to support the formation of that many CSG/CBGs, let alone the intricate systems required to support the operations of such scale.
 
Last edited:

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
JAI HIND! JAI ABSO-FVCKING-LUTELY HIND!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


From actual (retired) senior military officials, no less.

Talking big is very easy, especially when the Indian Navy doesn't even have enough AEGIS-equivalent DDGs and FFGs to support the formation of that many CSG/CBGs, let alone the intricate systems required to support the operations of such scale.
There is no Indian shipyard with a basin that fits ships bigger than Vikrant
 

Lethe

Captain
I have linked to the writings of Professor Prodyut Das on several previous occasions, as a figure who offers the rare combination of relevant engineering expertise, considerable personal historical experience working within India's defence-industrial complex, and a willingness to be openly critical of, even scathing towards, various development projects and institutions. In
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
recent piece he compares the development history of three Indian aerospace projects: ALH/Dhruv, HJT-36 Sitara and LCA/Tejas. It is worth reading the entire piece, but this pithy summary of the LCA program made me laugh (I have tidied the quoted portion up somewhat):

The Tejas programme can be put in two phases i.e. 1983- 2008 when problems were allowed to be created & concretized, and the period 2014 onwards when the problems are being rectified but the effort constrained because it is difficult to rectify a mistake once created into hardware [....] the programme can be summarized by imagining a situation where a very experienced group of designers were asked the question: What needs to be done to set back Indian fighter development by decades, wasting money and importantly time so that in the end they HAVE to import? Their recommendation would have been:

1. Shut down the existing design bureau and prevent it from bidding for the new project
2. Set up a new organization with no previous experience.
3. Introduce FBW as a must-have feature and make no effort to develop in parallel that unknown technology on an existing airframe e.g. Hunter or Marut or even in a Biz Jet.
4. Choose the most difficult, most “sensitive” basic configuration to develop: the tail-less FBW controlled Ultra Low Aspect ratio (>2) Delta.
5. To further reduce chances of success, shut out everyone including the customer and his painstaking inputs when designing the prototype.
6. Go in for a 65% (by surface area) use of carbon- carbon composites right at the beginning. Composites are more difficult to effect changes in. It will be remembered there was no carbon- carbon fabrication facility in India at that time. This decision was probably on the basis that one of the sister organizations had built a Rutan Design homebuilt using foam and s- Glass composites.
7. Keep reinforcing failures. The first flight date of April 1990 is missed. Instead of making management changes the then DRDO Leadership strongly supported the failure and its continuity.
8. When the first funds (equivalent to about 70 tons of gold) are run through the programme is massively re-funded.
9. It is only around 2011, when the mistakes have been cast into stone, that the IAF and others are brought in to rectify the mess.
10. Maintain a sustained media campaign to rewrite history about shortage of funds, lack of facilities, state of development of the Indian industry, lack of co-operation from everybody and even the start date of the project. Given the lack of interest and knowledge in aerospace matters it helps to a great extent in distorting responsibilities.
 
Last edited:

Pataliputra

Junior Member
Registered Member
The combat range of the Tejas MK1A has been significantly increased to approximately 740 kilometers, compared to the F16's range of only 550 kilometers. Furthermore, its payload carrying capacity has been enhanced by 500 kilograms. Although the target was to reduce weight by 1000 kilograms, information on this aspect is currently unavailable. More details are anticipated to be disclosed in the future. Overall, the Tejas MK1A seems to outperform the Tejas MK1 not only in avionics but also in fundamental parameters such as range and payload.
 
Top