Chinese Engine Development

G

gelgoog

Brigadier
Registered Member
ACuriousPLAFan said:
Will China develop an NK-12-equivalent engine to power her future airlifters? With a max power output of more than 11000 kW for the latter variants, the NK-12 is the most powerful turboprop engine in the world, ever.
Click to expand...
The NK-12 was designed after WW2 ended. By a team of German and Soviet scientists. And it is still unrivaled in its power level. A major accomplishment which enabled the first Soviet intercontinental bomber. There are Tu-95 still flying and the engine is still used in some gas pumping and power generation facilities even today.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:
G

GiantPanda

Junior Member
Registered Member
Atomicfrog said:
Someone have news regarding a Chinese equivalent of SABER engine ? On the SABER side, nothing looks to move at a credible pace to achieve a working engine demonstrator in the next 10 years or more...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...

Not that I've come across. This is just one of the ideas for hypersonic travel into space.

China has more interest in the detonation model:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Also with the explosion of electro-magnetic research into the other parts of the Chinese economy and military complex, there is a movement to look at if not already developing an EM rail-fun/launcher to throw hypersonics into space:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Jono

Jono

Junior Member
Registered Member
the idea of EM railgun launching a spacecraft looks attractive, and obviously can save a lot of costs.
however the question of whether Taikonaults can physically withstand the sudden and tremendous acceleration force from zero to 9M. I can imagine tremendous stress on the Body, the Heart, and the Spine in particular. Unless the design is solely for ICBM and other strategic missiles.

From Wikipedia: "While explosive-powered military guns cannot readily achieve a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of more than ≈2 km/s (Mach 5.9), railguns can readily exceed 3 km/s (Mach 8.8)."
 
I

iBBz

Junior Member
Registered Member
Jono said:
the idea of EM railgun launching a spacecraft looks attractive, and obviously can save a lot of costs.
however the question of whether Taikonaults can physically withstand the sudden and tremendous acceleration force from zero to 9M. I can imagine tremendous stress on the Body, the Heart, and the Spine in particular. Unless the design is solely for ICBM and other strategic missiles.

From Wikipedia: "While explosive-powered military guns cannot readily achieve a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of more than ≈2 km/s (Mach 5.9), railguns can readily exceed 3 km/s (Mach 8.8)."
Click to expand...
You can't accelerate a large rocket the way you are imagining it. They are simply too heavy to fire like a bullet. The idea here is to reduce the ridiculous amounts of fuel carried by rockets. If pilots can withstand catapults on carriers, astronauts can withstand less acceleration on space rockets.
 
siegecrossbow

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Jono said:
the idea of EM railgun launching a spacecraft looks attractive, and obviously can save a lot of costs.
however the question of whether Taikonaults can physically withstand the sudden and tremendous acceleration force from zero to 9M. I can imagine tremendous stress on the Body, the Heart, and the Spine in particular. Unless the design is solely for ICBM and other strategic missiles.

From Wikipedia: "While explosive-powered military guns cannot readily achieve a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of more than ≈2 km/s (Mach 5.9), railguns can readily exceed 3 km/s (Mach 8.8)."
Click to expand...

It is not for launching live payloads. It could launch mass into or it that could later be assembled.
 
D

DexterM

New Member
Registered Member
sunnymaxi said:
nope. as i said in my above post. non-Chinese people don't know much about recent China's progress.

China don't need to match with western firms in commercial turbo-fan market. this is a political problem.

tech matter, this is where China exploding. Liu Daxiang an Academician from Chinese Academy of Engineering Specialized in Turbofan Engines. he said, China will be a Tier 1 player in aero engine industry by 2030.
Click to expand...
Never underestimate the Chinese as Gina Raimondo found out.
 
G

GiantPanda

Junior Member
Registered Member
Alfa_Particle said:
They (Orca etc.) seems to be saying that the WS-10H might not see serial production after all?
View attachment 129651

From:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...

Cost benefits over standard WS-10 not worth it? Also iterations of WS-10 (B, C, C2, etc.) are rapid so needing to apply to the Hai model repeatedly probably makes the cost benefits even worse.

Then there is the WS-15 oncoming.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top