Which is the best anti ship aircraft

Like the title , which one will make the best anti ship platform again a ship with good anti air capability like Ticonderoga-class , Arleigh Burke or Kirov-class , assume the ship are close to shore enough that all these aircraft can use nap of the earth ( fly below radar horizon ) tactic to close in and launch their missiles , attack group group consist of 4 aircraft , no more , only one time
1) Su-30MKI with 1 BrahMos + 4 KH-31A ( 2 on the wing and 2 on the intake )



2) Su-33 carry 3 3M-54AE Klub + 2 KH-31A ( on intake )



3) Rafale carry 1 BrahMos-M + 6 AASM



4) JAS-39N carry 4 JSM


5) F-35 carry 24 SPEAR III ( internal + external )


6) F-35 carry 6 JSM ( internal + external )



7 ) Tu-22M2 loaded with 3 AS-4


8) B-52 carry 12 Harpoon


9) B-2 carry 216 SDB II

First HELLO, but sorry but why do I have that strange bad feeling that first of all I know these completely useless "mine vs. Yours"-treads which are plain stupid - maybe better for the Key-Forum - and second why do I have that even stranger feeling that this kind of posting is also well-known ....

Again, HELLO here but if these treads will only lead to pages of pages full of images, all hyperlinked to simply show that "Your's" is the best, then I beg You to read the Forum rules in advance ... they are a bit different to the one at the Key-Forum !

Deino

system such as AEGIS have been tested to intercept supersonic target before
Ex :
intercept Mach 4.7 ( AQM-37 ) using SM-2 , ESSM
intercept Mach 2.5 sea skimming ( GQM-163 Coyote ) using RAM , ESSM
intercept Mach 2.5 ( RIM-8 Talos ) using RAM
intercept Mach 10-20 ( ballistic target ) using SM-3
but i also have been said to handle saturation attack very good , and been tested to intercept multi-target at the same time , i think it was sth like intercept 100 target at the same time ?

Russian approaching seem to be overwhelm defense with speed , hence very fast missiles while Western thinking is to overwhelm air defense of enemy with number and low RCS , which one will likely be better to penetrate a ship air defense ?

Deino said:

First HELLO, but sorry but why do I have that strange bad feeling that first of all I know these completely useless "mine vs. Yours"-treads are plain stupid - maybe better for the Key-Forum - and second why do I have that even stranger feeling that this kind of posting is also well-known ....

Again, HELLO here but if these treads will only lead to pages of pages full of images, all hyperlinked to simply show that "Your's" is the best, then I beg You to read the Forum rules in advance ... they are a bit different to the one at the Key-Forum !

Deino

Click to expand...

not really kind of mine vs your thread , i just want to know again a modern ship which is the best way to penetrate the air defense

The best way to penetrate the air defense of a ship is to use a weapon that can't be engaged by air defense systems....like torpedo's?

I guess those who really know how to penetrate the air defense of a ship won't tell you.

Scyth said:

The best way to penetrate the air defense of a ship is to use a weapon that can't be engaged by air defense systems....like torpedo's?

I guess those who really know how to penetrate the air defense of a ship won't tell you.

Click to expand...

torpedo are very slow , there are decoy again torpedo too and last but not least they can actually be intercept by CIWS using super cavity bullet

And, we’re using the .50 [.50 BMG caliber], 20mm, and 30mm to kill torpedoes in the water

Click to expand...

.50 BMG supercavitating ammo, an armed UUV can “defeat steel objects” at 60 meters underwater, “or you can point the UUV out of the water, and from 5 meters below the surface, you can hit a target 1,000 meters in the air”, which is a “new application”.

Click to expand...