When China's Army asked the U.S. for a favor

bladerunner

Banned Idiot
IVe been cleaning up my old links and files, and came across this one. I must have kept it with the intention starting a thread on alternative history.

But knowing Popeye's stance with people indulging in historical revisionism/speculation, I must have had second thoughts.
Anyway Ill post it anyway as I think its quite a interesting read, even if it isnt worth commenting on. Anyway some forum members may have seen the article elsewhere or theres some doubt over the authenticity of the letter.



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


When China's Red Army asked the U.S. for a favor
Psst. Can you spare twenty million dollars to bribe some treasonous puppets?
By Andrew Leonard

Only two items have been uploaded to the "library" at the Frog In a Well collaborative Chinese history blog so far, but the most recent, a five-page letter dated January 1945 from the Chinese Communist Red Army general Zhu De asking for a "favor" of 20 million dollars from U.S. General Alfred Wedemeyer, makes one lust for more. Every historian digging through archives -- in this case the "Confidential Records of the Department of State" -- should be armed with a portable scanner and should, as a matter of principle, upload to the Internet whatever of interest he or she finds.
Why? Because it pleases me.

My dear General Wedemeyer:
I have a favor that I wish to ask you. In order to destroy the puppet forces and obtain victory over the enemy, we now wish to suggest that your army lend us twenty million dollars in United States currency. This army will assume full responsibility for the repayment of this sum following the victorious conclusion of the war against Japan."
The puppet forces to which Zhu De refers were Chinese soldiers more-or-less aligned with the Japanese invaders. Konrad Lawson, the doctoral student in history who discovered the letter describes them as "treasonous troops" who "sometimes worked closely with the Japanese, sometimes launched campaigns to suppress Communist and other insurgency forces, sometimes engaged in wild banditry, but more often than not, tried to stay alive and carefully monitor which way the wind was blowing in the war."
According to Zhu De's letter, in January 1945 there were about 900,000 puppet troops, comprising "a very powerful force assisting the Japanese." But with a little financial help from the Americans, Zhu De was convinced these fickle foes could be bribed to cause all kinds of trouble for their ostensible Japanese overlords. The money could pay for "using puppets for destruction of such things as hangars, airfields, aircraft, military depots, arsenals, and military factories, mines, railway stations, bridges, wharves, ships, trucks, tunnels, blockhouses and various other military installations," as well "to assassinate Japanese officers of the Army, Navy and Air forces."
Lawson could find no evidence that Wedemeyer, the commanding general of United States forces in the China theater, ever responded to Zhu De's entreaty. History informs us that the U.S. ended up backing the losing side in the Chinese Civil War that immediately followed the "victorious conclusion of the war against Japan." But fans of alternate history could well wonder, what might have happened if the U.S. had agreed to help out? Could a loan have fostered closer relations with the Chinese Communists? Could the whole course of modern Chinese history have shifted? What if the U.S. had jettisoned Chiang Kai-shek? Would an alliance between the U.S. and the Chinese Communists have mitigated or avoided the disasters that followed, such as the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution?
That way lies madness, of course. Instead all we are left with is the historical irony of comparing the cordial words of General Zhu De -- "I have a favor that I wish to ask of you" -- with the far more challenging rhetoric, delivered in July 2005, by another General Zhu, Zhu Chenghu, variously identified as either the nephew or grandson of Zhu De. This General Zhu sent shockwaves across the world when he told the Wall Street Journal that "if the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided ammunition on to the target zone on China's territory, I think we will have to respond with nuclear weapons," and that "we [...] will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all of the cities east of Xian. Of course the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds ... of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese."
• Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21. More Andrew Leonard
 
Last edited:

solarz

Brigadier
Nothing surprising about this, since China and the US were allies at the time. It's also quite a stretch to think that US-China relations would've changed for a measly 20 million loan. The CCP were aligned with the USSR, and the USA was the sworn enemy of the USSR. The anti-communism mentality of the 50's could hardly have warmed China-US relations, loan or no loan. That's not even mentioning the Korean War.

And what was so shocking about Zhu Chenghu's statement? He was simply stating MAD, and any American general would've held the same opinion.

Also, shouldn't this be in the Military History forum?
 

bladerunner

Banned Idiot
The twenty million would be worth several hundred in todays moneys? Anyway that's the problem when you look at things in a alternative manner theres so many different scenarios,egTHe money may have resulted in a greater presence in Korea because MAO had an extra 900.000 men civil war finishing earlier, or offsetting the Russians hence possibly no korean war or anti communist sentimentality yada yada
 
Last edited:

solarz

Brigadier
The twenty million would be worth several hundred in todays moneys? Anyway that's the problem when you look at things in a alternative manner theres so many different scenarios,egTHe money may have resulted in a greater presence in Korea because MAO had an extra 900.000 men civil war finishing earlier, or offsetting the Russians hence possibly no korean war or anti communist sentimentality yada yada

I seriously doubt 20 million could've recruited all the Japanese collaborator forces. Or any, for that matter. Traitors weren't looked upon too kindly.
 

A.Man

Major
The twenty million would be worth several hundred in todays moneys? Anyway that's the problem when you look at things in a alternative manner theres so many different scenarios,egTHe money may have resulted in a greater presence in Korea because MAO had an extra 900.000 men civil war finishing earlier, or offsetting the Russians hence possibly no korean war or anti communist sentimentality yada yada

So! What a big deal?

The US owes China more than a trillion dollars today. Oh, boy, China has $2.5 trillion on hand, 2 times the GDP of india or three times of South Korea? I am sorry, the US dallors on hand. China has much more cash on hand.
 
Last edited:

xywdx

Junior Member
Nothing surprising about this, since China and the US were allies at the time. It's also quite a stretch to think that US-China relations would've changed for a measly 20 million loan. The CCP were aligned with the USSR, and the USA was the sworn enemy of the USSR. The anti-communism mentality of the 50's could hardly have warmed China-US relations, loan or no loan. That's not even mentioning the Korean War.

You are completely ignoring the possibility that CPC was forced to side with USSR, many of the high ranking CPC leaders were very open minded, but did US ever give them a chance?
CPC was by no means a sure ally of USSR against US, it was much misunderstood at the time because of the US alliance with KMT.
Originally the Chinese government was formed by many political parties, it was the KMT who started the "one party to rule China" campaign, all other parties were either absorbed or destroyed, the CPC refused to yield and fought on to preserve fair representation for the people.
The KMT rule of China was essentially one of Feudalism and Autocracy, which didn't match up with the US ideals at all, the CPC understand this and tried to get it through to no avail.
 

solarz

Brigadier
You are completely ignoring the possibility that CPC was forced to side with USSR, many of the high ranking CPC leaders were very open minded, but did US ever give them a chance?

I believe that's what I said.
 

RainMaker

Just Hatched
Registered Member
I think in reality. Whichever way the wind would have blown. Mao would have lead China independently of western interests. If Chiang had secured mainland China as well he would also have not been as docile with the western world, as he had to from the confines of Taiwan.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Actually things could easily have turned out very differently had this offer been even partially accepted.

I remember watch a History Channel documentary on WWII years ago, and the US actually had a high ranking officer (general IIRC) who met up and spent quite some time with the Communist forces during the fight against the Japanese.

This general (could not remember his name unfortunately) actually recommended that the US ditch the nationalists and support the communists as at that time the CCP had no strong links with the USSR (other than being ideologically similar and many of its leaders studied in the USSR) nor did the receive much in the way of support from the Soviets.

In addition, the CCP were far less corrupt and much better fighters compared to nationalist forces.

However, the US bulked at the idea because of the word 'communist', and the rest was history.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Actually things could easily have turned out very differently had this offer been even partially accepted.

I remember watch a History Channel documentary on WWII years ago, and the US actually had a high ranking officer (general IIRC) who met up and spent quite some time with the Communist forces during the fight against the Japanese.

This general (could not remember his name unfortunately) actually recommended that the US ditch the nationalists and support the communists as at that time the CCP had no strong links with the USSR (other than being ideologically similar and many of its leaders studied in the USSR) nor did the receive much in the way of support from the Soviets.

In addition, the CCP were far less corrupt and much better fighters compared to nationalist forces.

However, the US bulked at the idea because of the word 'communist', and the rest was history.

Are you referring to the Dixie mission?
 
Top