ROK US agree on creation of mini-CFC

sunflower

New Member
Registered Member
Q29AZsg4.jpg

Korea and the US have agreed to create a new joint command that will replace the Combined Forces Command when full operational control of Korean troops return to Seoul in 2015. The new body is expected to take over key wartime functions of the CFC.

Korea and the US agreed to form a joint task force that will come up with ways to effectively combine the command structures of the Korean and US militaries at the annual security talks in Washington. The allies agreed to identify specific types of nuclear threats by North Korea and map out joint deterrence strategies tailored to each type of threat by 2014. Through the OPCON transfer, South Korean forces will play a leading role and their American counterparts will play a supporting role.

The absence of a control tower will wreak havoc in combined operations in the event of contingencies. And South Korea still lacks in intelligence gathering and precision strike capabilities. Moreover, tensions in the Korean peninsula remain unchanged, making anxieties about the OPCON transfer plausible. The US has no reason to oppose the creation of the mini-CFC, considering China's strong emergence in Northeast Asia.

Although South Korean military needs to gain the ability to stand on its own feet, a sudden independence could be disastrous to the national security of Korea. Therefore, I believe it is crucial that the two countries form a mini-CFC.
 

delft

Brigadier
In 2015 another small step to South Korean independence. The South Korean armed forces are much stronger, more modern, than those of North Korea. War with China would be in the interest of either. The only serious threat might come from Japan, wrt Dokdo islands, if politics in Japan were to derail. A treaty to protect the freedom of navigation signed by all countries in East Asia arranging for the cooperation of navies and airforces would make the presence of US forces unnecessary.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
View attachment 7022

Korea and the US have agreed to create a new joint command that will replace the Combined Forces Command when full operational control of Korean troops return to Seoul in 2015. The new body is expected to take over key wartime functions of the CFC.

Korea and the US agreed to form a joint task force that will come up with ways to effectively combine the command structures of the Korean and US militaries at the annual security talks in Washington. The allies agreed to identify specific types of nuclear threats by North Korea and map out joint deterrence strategies tailored to each type of threat by 2014. Through the OPCON transfer, South Korean forces will play a leading role and their American counterparts will play a supporting role.

The absence of a control tower will wreak havoc in combined operations in the event of contingencies. And South Korea still lacks in intelligence gathering and precision strike capabilities. Moreover, tensions in the Korean peninsula remain unchanged, making anxieties about the OPCON transfer plausible. The US has no reason to oppose the creation of the mini-CFC, considering China's strong emergence in Northeast Asia.

Although South Korean military needs to gain the ability to stand on its own feet, a sudden independence could be disastrous to the national security of Korea. Therefore, I believe it is crucial that the two countries form a mini-CFC.

I heartily agree with your assessment, and as I read Master Delfts response to your fine analysis of the US/SKorean partnership, I would remind you, his nation does not reside in the Shadow of an ambitious hedgemony of power as it did several years ago. Many of those who have depended on the benevolent concerns of the US, find themselves as resentfull as teenagers of their parents love and protection, once they no longer find that necessary, but that doesn't stop them from expecting Daddy and Momma to hand out cash when they get a little low. No one in your region respects S. Korea's independance more than the USA, and we're willing to place ourselves "out there on your behalf". As a Nation, we all must understand whos for us, and who's against us, as this global alliance is very costly for US citizens, I am more than willing to defend those who have asked for our help, I am no longer willing to take money out of my pocket and defend the "Ungratefull".
In conclusion watch the buzzards move in once the US is out of our Middle Eastern foray, and you will find the real threats to world peace and national sovereignty around the world. Thank you for your post, and blessings of peace and freedom to you today. Brat
 

kroko

Senior Member
I heartily agree with your assessment, and as I read Master Delfts response to your fine analysis of the US/SKorean partnership, I would remind you, his nation does not reside in the Shadow of an ambitious hedgemony of power as it did several years ago. Many of those who have depended on the benevolent concerns of the US, find themselves as resentfull as teenagers of their parents love and protection, once they no longer find that necessary, but that doesn't stop them from expecting Daddy and Momma to hand out cash when they get a little low. No one in your region respects S. Korea's independance more than the USA, and we're willing to place ourselves "out there on your behalf". As a Nation, we all must understand whos for us, and who's against us, as this global alliance is very costly for US citizens, I am more than willing to defend those who have asked for our help, I am no longer willing to take money out of my pocket and defend the "Ungratefull".
In conclusion watch the buzzards move in once the US is out of our Middle Eastern foray, and you will find the real threats to world peace and national sovereignty around the world. Thank you for your post, and blessings of peace and freedom to you today. Brat

Are you critisizing SK for being more military independent from the US ?
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Are you critisizing SK for being more military independent from the US ?

Not at all, I think more of our defence partners need to carry their own weight, and if you read my post I made the point that no one respects SK's independence more than the US, and if SK were left on here own, I'm sure her sovereignty might be threatened, hence a mini CFC would seem to be wise.
 
Top