Russian Air Force Chief Upbeat Over PAK FA First Flight Date
Aviation Week & Space Technology
01/23/2006, page 33
Alexey Komarov
Moscow
Douglas Barrie
London
Several aircraft are being upgraded for air force use, but funding casts pall over all
Printed headline: Russian Roll Call
Russian air force chief Gen. Vladimir Mikhailov claims its PAK FA fifth-generation fighter prototype will fly in 2007, and indicates the service is also pursuing a single-engine light fighter as a complement.
The PAK FA, a large twin-engine Su-27 Flanker-class fighter, is being developed by Sukhoi, which designates it the T-50.
MIKHAILOV'S OPTIMISM may be fueled by the boost in Russia's defense procurement allotment. It is set at 236.7 billion rubles ($8.3 billion), a 31% rise above last year's budget. The PAK FA program is scheduled for an increase in development funding as part of the overall budget growth.
Mikhailov suggests they will do "whatever it takes" to have a prototype up by 2007. Wind tunnel testing of the airframe design is already complete.
He notes that the air force is looking to use PAK FA avionics and sensors also in a single-engine design.
Russian industry sources have confirmed that MiG wind-tunnel tested light fighter designs. Sukhoi could also investigate a single-engine design.
Sukhoi CEO Mikhail Pogosyan has been more cautious regarding a first flight of the PAK FA, indicating 2008 as a more likely date. Completion of preliminary state acceptance trials would follow in 2012-13, with full-scale production to begin in 2015, he believes.
With limited funding for the PAK FA, early financing for a single-engine program is highly unlikely, suggest military analysts in Moscow.
The air force is faced with an aging combat aircraft fleet and limited resources, so development programs and aircraft acquisitions need to be viewed in the light of this constraint, analysts say.
The air force's overall acquisition budget will double for 2006, according to Russian Defense Minister Sergey Ivanov. Nine aircraft will be added to the fleet. This includes the two Tupolev Tu-160 Blackjack strategic bombers that had been listed for 2005 delivery. One is simply an upgraded aircraft, the other is being built from unused airframe components from the original production run.
THE AIR FORCE is also due to begin to take delivery of Su-34 (Su-27IB) strike aircraft this year. Series production, albeit a very limited run, is underway at Novosibirsk and will be used to replace some of the aging Su-24 Fencers.
The near-term focus, however, remains on in-service upgrades. Alongside the Su-27SM, at least 18 Flankers have been modified to this standard to date, and the air force is also starting a MiG-29 Fulcrum program. "I've already ordered delivery of two dozen MiG-29s to MiG facilities for upgrade," Mikhailov says. A further six Su-27SMs are expected to be acquired this year.
The air force is continuing to test other upgrade packages. Aircraft undergoing state acceptance trials include the Sukhoi Su-25 Frogfoot, MiG-31 Foxhound, and Tupolev Tu-95 Bear and Tu-22M3 bombers.
Acceptance trials of the Mil Mi-28N Havoc attack helicopter are also underway. Rostvertol completed the first series-production standard aircraft in December 2005.
Mikhailov expects the first Yakovlev Yak-130 jet trainer will enter service by year-end.
All this activity belies the air force's ongoing budget problems. The 2005 plan called for four Yak-130s to be delivered in 2006, but the manufacturer suggests it will only supply one airframe due to lack of funds.
Last month, the Komsomolsk-on-Amur (KnAAPO) plant claimed it had yet to be paid for the Su-27SM upgrade. The dispute is ongoing.
Further developments include the Ilyushin Il-112V turboprop utility aircraft, which the air force plans to purchase to replace the Antonov An-26. MiG is also looking to manufacture a further prototype of the MiG-AT, substituting Russian for French engines and using local avionics sources to meet Russian air force stipulations.
If I were to pick between the Russian general and the Sukhoi CEO on who is closer to the truth, I would have to go with the CEO. Will be interesting to see or hear if anything does fly in two yrs. time. And no mention of foreign investment like India.