GreatYuran
New Member
Hey the other day i heard something on tv about a nuclear aircraft program back during the 50s. Does anyone have any information about this?
"Between 1946 and 1961, the Air Force and the Atomic Energy Commission spent more than $7 billion trying to develop a nuclear-powered aircraft. Although no airplane ever flew under nuclear power, the Air Force converted a B-36 bomber, known as the Nuclear Test Aircraft, to carry an operating three-megawatt air-cooled reactor to assess operational problems (it made 47 flights over Texas and New Mexico between July 1955 and March 1957). The NB-36H carried the reactor in its aft bomb bay and incorporated a new nose section, which housed a 12 ton lead and rubber shielded crew compartment with 10-12 inch (25-30 centimeters) thick leaded-glass windows. Water pockets in the fuselage and behind the crew compartment also absorbed radiation (due to weight constraints, nothing was done to shield the considerable emissions from the top, bottom or sides of the reactor)." (Source: Brookings Institute)
In theory, nuclear-powered aircraft could stay in flight for weeks at a time. General Electric built two prototype engines for such a plane. These engines exist today and can be viewed outside the EBR-1 complex in Arco, Idaho.
MIGleader said:u know, this kind of project is exatcly what we need. if the u.s can make nuclear aircraft, nuclear powered cars are not so far off.
uranium: $1 a gallon
swimmerXC said:if you want to make everything nuclear then this world is perfect for terrorist, they dont even need car bombs anymore when they can just drive a nuclear car and park it in front (backside or side) of the whitehouse...
nuclear fusion might be handy (hydrogen power cars) but fission? we only have a limited ammount of uranium in this world and what are they going to do with the nuclear waste after the reactor dies?? bury it and let the future ppl figure it out?
the way i see it, when the world supply of oil runs out, fighter will be obsolete and people will try and go for bigger "ships" (fighters) that can be a space based fighter and explorer...
MIGleader said:as for powering a plane by nuclear means, do they mean fusion or fission? fusion would almost be impossible due to the amount of coolant, uranium, and the wieght of the rods used. fusion would almost never be achieved sine there is now way they can create a heat source on a plane hot enough to start the fusion. so this programs a dud...
walter said:they meant fission because nuclear fusion had been achieved on earth in the form of an H-bomb or reactors that eat more energy than they produce, hence the reactors were fission reactors like all conventional nuclear reactors today. Also, are you sure about the heat source? I don't think heat is what's required to start a nuclear chain reaction, or did i miss something in physics class?