nothing to see here
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
The source was a 2018 paper:
It seems that was the year that China and Japan re-established the currency swap deal. Calling it "easily falsifiable BS" is not a charitable characterisation as the thrust of my post is still correct. There was a rapprochement between China/Japan and mysterious deaths led to its expiry in 2013.
My statements about Australia also hold.
Every time a country begins to have an independent foreign policy, the US intervenes, whether through official means or clandestine.
Last edited:
There is no doubt a lot of US influence in these allied countries. But that is true about US as well, where there is a lot of influence via lobbyists, businesses and think tankers getting funds and influence from places like Japan, Taiwan or Europe. And every time US wants to make a policy that goes against the current Western empire paradigm, such as going soft on Taiwan for example or Ukraine, these influences start steer US policy back to what it was before.
But in both US and in allied countries if there is a fundamental shift in public thinking due to national interest, then these soft influences are not going to be able to stop change. They can push and pull in certain directions, but national political will can trump these influence ops.
Japan has more anti-China national thinking than US does and no amount of CIA op will be able to change that. If US becomes a Chinese friend for example, then Japan will likely take out US forces right away and become a north korea like pariah country rather bow to China. This is the fundamental national will of Japan.
Same thing about the baltics, they would rather become America's enemy than bow to Russia.
Taiwan and DPP has been hugely influential in fomenting anti-China hawkishness and funding hawkish lawmakers and think tankers in US. Without DPP and Taiwan US would be far less hostile to China.
So, again, its not true that US is the master of these countries. In many cases, they are even hawkish than US and influences US to be more hawkish than it wants to be. In a way, they are bigger worshipper of Western empire than US itself.
Your statements are vague and not convincing. What are the quantitative levels of funding? How do they compare to Lockheed Martin or Blackrock or Alphabet? I'm talking about assassinations and leaks in diplomatic cables here.
Why is Japan's anti-China stance taken as a natural state?
How is AUKUS anything but clearly against Australia's own national interests? I know we're stupid here, but not that stupid.
Here's another solid example about US interference in China/India:
Why is Japan's anti-China stance taken as a natural state?
How is AUKUS anything but clearly against Australia's own national interests? I know we're stupid here, but not that stupid.
Here's another solid example about US interference in China/India:
Last edited:
Israeli research study aiming to polish it's image found that the stain of genocide cannot be removed but it could regain some image if it promoted Islamophobia in the media (which is what I've been seeing nonstop on Twitter for the past month).
And also, all the former colonial powers abstained, except Russia
Last edited:
Explains why Jewish mouthpieces like Laura loomer tried to divert American ire against Jewish influence towards China.
In fact, this tactic lends credence to the white nationalist argument that open borders are supported by Jewish lobby groups to provide cover and scapegoat targets away from Jewish groups for their supposed meddling. Divide and rule, if the ppl are too busy hating Muslim immigrants or Africans or rapists from the subcontinent, then there won’t be any energy left to target Jews for doing whatever rituals they’re doing in tunnels on stained mattresses.