...of what?
You act as if the Palestinians brought it upon themselves when during the first inception of the conflict, the Israelis were literally backed by the British Empire and later on especially the United States, both in material and manpower supports.
I don't disagree with any of that. But regardless of why, the fact of the matter remains that today, Palestine is too weak, to say nothing about defending it's own borders, but too weak potentially to even exist. Again, we can talk about why all day long but that doesn't change the fact of what it is today.
What a rather unhinged point, the Palestinians were NEVER had the chance to stand up for their rights, they were literally robbed off it from the very moment. The Nakbas were intentionally utilized in order to gave the Palestinians to have no chance in fighting back.
Again, not denying that. There's nothing unhinged with understanding reality as opposed to operating from delusion. The second Nakba WILL continue at this point. The Palestinians WILL be ethnically cleansed from Gaza. Unless you have a DF41 hidden somewhere with a launcher and a few warheads...or a surface action group along with a few hundred fifth generation fighters, nothing you say here will change that fact. In this case, why something has happened is not as important as the end result.
The powers that
could help the Palestinians clearly are not.
They were never given the chance to fight and when they were give a breathing room to organized a resistance, it was all too late (Israel has been fully established).
...yes, and?
Realism theory has no place in analyzing this conflict at all, it is too shallow and only emphasize on the vibes and aura without any substantial ground.
No, what you're doing right now is emphasizing vibes and aura. The 'substantial ground' here is that the Palestinians are going certainly going to experience ethnic cleansing in Gaza. What's important for us as non-Palestinians is to understand that:
a.) being weak enough is a sin.
b.) no amount of moral posturizing is going to stop a PGM.
I find it both funny and contradicting that you took a more moralist approach in regards to the treatment of Jews with your opinion on Palestinians previously.
Yes, because like you, I too find this distasteful at best, utterly inhuman at worst. What unlike you, I've come to realize, "what's the point?" Certainly, on this forum, I can sign the end of every post I have with, "and of course, the nation of Israel must be cleansed with nuclear fire for their crimes". But what will that really accomplish?
While there are certainly jews who opposed Israeli genocide on Gaza but their voices are extremely inconsequential.
This is a graph of the percentage of jews who expressed their support of the Israeli actions:
View attachment 151282
Double standard much?
Do you even understand what is a double standard? Please explain how I am engaging in that.
Imagine if one were to say the same about the jews and the Holocaust. Funnily enough, that attitude is quite zionist, they would mock holocaust survivor and deem them weak and less than trash which is why most of them were shuned in Israel.
Another one for the drink
Arguably, when the Jews were getting Holocausted, it
would have been the correct argument to make. And so they went about to change that by creating the nation of Israel.
I'm not sure if this simply didn't come through my text post, but at no point am I "mocking" the Palestinians. If anything, I'm mocking us as bystanders who are going on and on about how this a crime against humanity, about how this can not stand, etc. At the end of the day, the demise of the Palestinians in Gaza should be used as a lesson for us. Never allow your people to become weak, for weakness is a sin, especially in the realm of geopolitics. Right now, it's Gaza, but in a less violent way, Denmark, Canada, and the European Union as a whole is starting to wake up to this age old lesson.