Funny article thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
manqiangrexue

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
solarz said:
The two aren't mutually exclusive you know.
Click to expand...
They are not mutually exclusive in effect, but they are mutually exclusive in intent and success/failure is measured by intent. If you set out this morning to go to Walmart but got disoriented and ended up at Burger King, you failed in your navigation to Walmart; you didn't successfully navigate to Burger King. In effect, you did, but in intent, from your perspective, you certainly did not succeed. Can you understand that?
solarz said:
Besides, Trump's definition of a legacy is probably different from yours.
Click to expand...
I doubt it; I made my definition according to his actions against China. He set out to make the US dominate China and every one of his actions agrees; what he had to do to save face after he failed is another story. What do you think his definition is, a 2 parter starting with being an American hero and if not that, then a successful conman with either being considered a success?
solarz said:
From all we've seen, Trump's definition of "win" is whatever he says it is. So as long as he's got a sizeable amount of followers agreeing with him, his goal is achieved regardless of what the actual state of the nation is.
Click to expand...
I remind you, it's about what he intended to and set out to do in the beginning, NOT what it devolved into for a deranged old man who could never publically admit defeat or mistake no matter what happens. When he screws up reading a person's name on stage, he pretends that what he said is a nickname, for cryin' out loud! Can you say that's a win and he intended to do that, or are you able to understand that he made a mistake and tried his best to cover it up, so his gaff is actually a failure instead of a real win?
 
Last edited:
broadsword

broadsword

Brigadier
supersnoop said:
Like I said, not interested in changing your opinion. If you think a guy who lends his name to a shyster urine test fashions himself as a “great helmsman”, that’s fantastic.



1. He met with Xi at Mar-A-Lago
2. A lot of the products were not successful and were discontinued quickly
3. Many that did decently were discontinued after the whole “Mexican rapists” speech
4. Personal benefit doesn’t just mean economic, also just feeding his own ego
Click to expand...

1. How many times?
2, 3. So much for personal benefits!
4. Any different from other presidents?
 
Equation

Equation

Lieutenant General
solarz said:
From all we've seen, Trump's definition of "win" is whatever he says it is. So as long as he's got a sizeable amount of followers agreeing with him, his goal is achieved regardless of what the actual state of the nation is.
Click to expand...
That's because the majority of his so called followers are only agreeing with him because of their racist inferiority and superiority complex and negative view about China. It could be anyone, they just need an idiot to blurt it out in public. Deep down they don't care about human values other than white supremacy. That's why you see so many Republicans such as Ted Cruz, Marjory Taylor Green and Tom Cotton caters to these people point of views and beliefs, because that's a large 35% to 40% voters that they need to cater to get win votes.
 
S

sinophilia

Junior Member
Registered Member
clockwork said:
Someone should remake this but add the Bonhomme Richard, those 2 Burkes and the submarine lol
Click to expand...

Yes lmao have the 2 Burkes crashing into each other, the Bonhomme a burning carcass, and the sub there is a pic of it missing its bow so they can use that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top