Chinese OS and software ecosystem

MrCrazyBoyRavi

Junior Member
Registered Member
All these Chinese app getting banned, while American flocking to chinese apps. I wonder if there was an opensource chinese OS, then it might have been very successfull now. Does Any mobile OS apart from harmony OS exits now ?
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
@sunnymaxi

My post got mass deleted, or assumed off-topic because of an FLG joke

However, what are your thoughts on Loongson's lack of native software?

It is very difficult for a niche architecture to achieve successful commercial adoption. Look at the PowerPC/POWER which was used by Apple, despite having a captive user base, it was abandoned
Now Apple re-adopted self-designed chips, but on the mass-adopted ARM architecture

Here is one analysis that notes the poor software optimization for the Loongson chips
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Don't mind the clickbaity title. That site is actually very complimentary of the ability of Loongson to design chips, the biggest hold up in their opinion is software optimization as above, and also lack of access to cutting edge processes.

At this point, Loongarch seems like an academic exercise, like if somehow China lost all access to ARM, x86 tomorrow, it would not have to totally start from ground zero.
 

sunnymaxi

Major
Registered Member
@sunnymaxi

My post got mass deleted, or assumed off-topic because of an FLG joke

However, what are your thoughts on Loongson's lack of native software?

It is very difficult for a niche architecture to achieve successful commercial adoption. Look at the PowerPC/POWER which was used by Apple, despite having a captive user base, it was abandoned
Now Apple re-adopted self-designed chips, but on the mass-adopted ARM architecture

Here is one analysis that notes the poor software optimization for the Loongson chips
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Don't mind the clickbaity title. That site is actually very complimentary of the ability of Loongson to design chips, the biggest hold up in their opinion is software optimization as above, and also lack of access to cutting edge processes.

At this point, Loongarch seems like an academic exercise, like if somehow China lost all access to ARM, x86 tomorrow, it would not have to totally start from ground zero.
There are so many mistakes in this massage and the article..

1. Loongson has now access to cutting edge microchips. they did hint about 7nm last year.
2. LoongArch architecture is fully commercialized software. they don't use ARM.
3. in this article they mentioned older CPUs like 5000/6000 series but didn't even mention Loongson's 3C6000 and incoming 6600 series.
------------------------------------------------------------
just read this article please

Chinese chipmaker teases “world-leading” performance of next-gen 7nm CPU — 3B6600 rocks eight LA864 cores clocked at 3 GHz​


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

And probably the most interesting nugget from Hu, was a request for information regarding the architecture and performance of the upcoming Loongson 3B6600 processor. Hu underlined significant architectural changes that have been implemented with the 3B6600. Thanks to these LoongArch changes, and we would presume a range of other optimizations, the new CPU would deliver a single-core performance “expected to be in the world's leading ranks,” asserted Hu.
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
There are so many mistakes in this massage and the article..

1. Loongson has now access to cutting edge microchips. they did hint about 7nm last year.
2. LoongArch architecture is fully commercialized software. they don't use ARM.
3. in this article they mentioned older CPUs like 5000/6000 series but didn't even mention Loongson's 3C6000 and incoming 6600 series.
------------------------------------------------------------
just read this article please

Chinese chipmaker teases “world-leading” performance of next-gen 7nm CPU — 3B6600 rocks eight LA864 cores clocked at 3 GHz​


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

And probably the most interesting nugget from Hu, was a request for information regarding the architecture and performance of the upcoming Loongson 3B6600 processor. Hu underlined significant architectural changes that have been implemented with the 3B6600. Thanks to these LoongArch changes, and we would presume a range of other optimizations, the new CPU would deliver a single-core performance “expected to be in the world's leading ranks,” asserted Hu.
I read that one, but since the chip is not yet released so it is forward looking.

7nm will get them far in performance, this is about where Intel's desktop chips are now.

LoongArch is well-documented, and I've read a lot of programmers are curious about it, but basically there is not much availability outside China which is a major limitation to commercial success.

Contrast this to something like Huawei which has a global footprint and distribution and service network that could deploy HiSilicon hardware.
 

Legume7

New Member
Registered Member
At the Maextro S800 technology launch event, Huawei revealed that a device with HarmonyOS 5.1 would be needed to use in-vehicle satellite features. Given that the Maextro S800 will be launched in May, it's like that HarmonyOS 5.1 will be out before then.

5.1.jpg
 
Top