Re: China's Transport Aircraft
The endangered infrastructure includes airfields and their fuel supply. For defensive purposes a railway network is more efficient and cheaper, but if you want to be able to attack countries anywhere in the world at short notice you need large aircraft. That is why the US has more than 200 C-17's, while any other user has less than 20. But using ships is generally much cheaper and that is the preferred method for the US and any other country.
Btw the Dutch Navy spend an extra EUR 100 million above what was agreed with parliament to change the design of its latest transport ship to enable it to transport the tanks of the Dutch army. The last eighty tanks are now for sale and should bring in EUR 200 million.
The endangered infrastructure includes airfields and their fuel supply. For defensive purposes a railway network is more efficient and cheaper, but if you want to be able to attack countries anywhere in the world at short notice you need large aircraft. That is why the US has more than 200 C-17's, while any other user has less than 20. But using ships is generally much cheaper and that is the preferred method for the US and any other country.
Btw the Dutch Navy spend an extra EUR 100 million above what was agreed with parliament to change the design of its latest transport ship to enable it to transport the tanks of the Dutch army. The last eighty tanks are now for sale and should bring in EUR 200 million.