the misreading of the swivelling wingtips as some kind of xb-70-esque waverider wingtip is just baffling to me. how does one even arrive at such a conclusion from all the images available?
Perhaps it's the aero engineer talking but I dislike the grouping of LERX into leading edge devices and I dislike the idea of calling all these leading edge devices leading edge extensions.All LERXs are LEXs. But not all LEXs are LERXs.
Is it just me, or it looks not unlike that weird tandem VTOL patent from one year ago?Not sure if legit, but this was posted on FB:
via Ying Qin: „一個淘汰的構型方案,採用了腹部進氣道。“
„An obsolete configuration using a ventral air intake.“
Original source is @兰墨飞花_星海入梦日出烟燧 on Weibo.
View attachment 149978
Not sure if legit, but this was posted on FB:
via Ying Qin: „一個淘汰的構型方案,採用了腹部進氣道。“
„An obsolete configuration using a ventral air intake.“
Original source is @兰墨飞花_星海入梦日出烟燧 on Weibo.
View attachment 149978
Could you link to the patent in question by any chance?Is it just me, or it looks not unlike that weird tandem VTOL patent from one year ago?
Could you link to the patent in question by any chance?
: "Personal Early Works Collection"Not sure if legit, but this was posted on FB:
via Ying Qin: „一個淘汰的構型方案,採用了腹部進氣道。“
„An obsolete configuration using a ventral air intake.“
Original source is @兰墨飞花_星海入梦日出烟燧 on Weibo.
View attachment 149978