Ask anything Thread

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
do you guys think this is a game changer? I am a new and ignorant person related to these topics but the thought of facing a long range hypersonic anti ship missile would surely deter me from getting anywhere near a type 055 class destroyer.

The USAF also says China has a 20x cost advantage in terms of equivalent hypersonic missile capability in the Western Pacific.

If we use the LHRW ($43 Mn) as the likely baseline, that implies a DF-17 is only $2 Million.
That $2 Mn figure also matches up with the stated figure in a Guancha podcast.

---

Based on your statement, the implication is that the US Navy would be deterred from approaching to within 3000km of mainland China.
 

Surpluswarrior

Junior Member
VIP Professional
Does the PLAN have a use for a new-generation corvette / light-frigate?

It seems a platform like that would be good for rolling out the latest propulsion and RCS-reduction technology, without spending on a larger hull. Would PLAN formations benefit from more pickets and liason ships?

PLAN probably wants to give more new commands to command-track officers.
 

Tupolev16

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Good evening, dear members. Could you give me a hand with the follwing issue.
I am writing a book about first generation of chinese diesel subs, many questions occur. Two of the them are hard to solve:
1) Were all Romeos of type 033 fitted with two 6E390C engines or the latest samples were given more mighty 6E390ZC-1 ?
2) Do I understand correctly that the latest variants 035G and 035B of Ming class were given 6E390ZC-2 engines?

Tnank you in advance!
 
Top