Miscellaneous News

O

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Dark Father said:
The escalation knows no bounds. They could wipe the Chinese leadership off earth in like what 5 minutes by parking those boomers in South Korean territorial waters.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651221321978638338
Click to expand...
S.Korea is part of the American Empire so its actually very natural that American Empire military assets would be stationed there.

Anyone surprised by this move hasn't been paying enough attention. The American Empire is consolidating its territories, so you can expect similar moves to continue. Philippines is also part of this process
 
Last edited:
A

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Dark Father said:

The escalation knows no bounds. They could wipe the Chinese leadership off earth in like what 5 minutes by parking those boomers in South Korean territorial waters.​


https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651221321978638338

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651431240543739904
Click to expand...
Although we don't know whether it actually exists for China or not - China better have a Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) of their own.

China having a COOP can ensure that in case Beijing and the (majority of the) nation's top leadership body is suddenly wiped out in a decapitation nuclear strike, there is still someone else who can properly and lawfully take over the governance of the entire country. There is also the consideration of the need to minimize the probability and scale of mutiny and anarchy that could happen elsewhere across the country following this kind of attacks against the central government of China.

Presidential line of succession, designated survivor, backup command centers, underground bunkers, doomsday planes... all of them are required for China in face of worsening geopolitical situation in the IndoPac and across the globe today.
 
Last edited:
A

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Overbom said:
S.Korea is part of the American Empire so its actually very natural that American Empire military assets would be stationed there.

Anyone surprised by this move hasn't been paying enough attention. The American Empire is consolidating its territories, so you can expect similar moves to continue. Philippines is also part of this process
Click to expand...
On one hand, China probably expected this to come anyhow, and China surely understood the true purpose of this SSBN's presence in the location.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

On the other hand, should the US launch nuclear strikes against China from SSBN(s) based in South Korea, China should consider South Korea as a complicit in the American nuclear attack against China - On the basis that South Korea is responsible for the docking and servicing of the SSBN and their crew onboard.

Therefore, even if South Korea does not possess any nuclear weapons of their own, South Korea should be seen as a legitimate nuclear retaliation target by China. This means that once China detects American nuclear-tipped missiles coming towards them from American SSBN that has docked in South Korea before the war begins and/or before the strikes begin, China is fully justified to launch her own nuclear attacks against not just the US, but also South Korea.

Of course, this clause should never be limited to SSBNs only. Strategic bombers, fighters and land-based TELs that are capable of carrying and launching nuclear bombs and/or nuclear-tipped missiles too should be included in the clause.

I believe that sometime into the future, Beijing has to deliver a stern warning to their counterparts in Seoul - privately. The message is this - Either the South Koreans can stop the Americans from stationing their nukes that are directly pointed at their neighbour next door (in exchange for Beijing restricting Pyongyang's actions north of the 38th parallel), or they can witness their cities getting flattened with their very own eyes.

Meanwhile, it would be better for China to make this warning public only when sh1t is about to hit the fan, e.g. full-scale war between China and the US is in the horizon, or that visible signs are pointing towards potential nuclear first strikes against China are being actively considered by Washington DC.

Of course (again), this clause should also not be limited to South Korea. Any country(ies) in the Indo-Pacific region whose actions can be interpreted as a complicit of this should also be targetted as a justified nuclear retaliation move by Beijing.
 
Last edited:
D

duncanidaho

Junior Member
AssassinsMace

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Right now the US is in scare the enemy into submission mode. I would go as far to say Biden is doing this just to get China to call him. The US's little wargame up at capital hill was also just to scare China because it was unnecessary nonsense except for the publicity. Their little anti-China committee is all for show for at home that they're doing something when they're actually doing nothing and for China hoping to scare China into submission when it just look like what it is... the US playing children's games. I've mentioned before that the US Naval War college has conducted wargames of a US attack on China for nearly forty years and every single one of them the US has lost because China can fire swarm after swarm after swarm of cheaply made anti-ship missiles at the US Navy. Did they play that in their little wargame...? They also played the economic angle of their little wargame and they said China would suffer. Not as much as the US because if they think they would survive the economic war, why haven't they already done it? Psychologically the US would suffer more even if in actuality they suffered less. Look at Vietnam or Iraq. The US suffered far fewer casualties yet that is what turned people against the war.
 
hullopilllw

hullopilllw

Junior Member
Registered Member
ACuriousPLAFan said:
Germany definitely learnt a lot from their master across the Atlantic: "Let's shoot at the person that we want to talk with for no fvcking reason whatsoever before we start talking with that person. Works everytime, right?"

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651527145305546752
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651529778187624448

Honestly, I'm getting more and more disappointed with Germany ever since Merkel left the helm.
Click to expand...
Why ? Surely you should know that in the end of the day, anglo race as a whole wont be able to accept the comprehensive rise of a non-white race on a scale like what the chinese does ?

containment WILL be their main course of action, rhetorics can be soften to continue extracting value out of China as a market.
 
GZDRefugee

GZDRefugee

Junior Member
Registered Member
ACuriousPLAFan said:
On one hand, China probably expected this to come anyhow, and China surely understood the true purpose of this SSBN's presence in the location.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

On the other hand, should the US launch nuclear strikes against China from SSBN(s) based in South Korea, China should consider South Korea as a complicit in the American nuclear attack against China - On the basis that South Korea is responsible for the docking and servicing of the SSBN and their crew onboard.

Therefore, even if South Korea does not possess any nuclear weapons of their own, South Korea should be seen as a legitimate nuclear retaliation target by China. This means that once China detects American nuclear-tipped missiles coming towards them from American SSBN that has docked in South Korea before the war begins and/or before the strikes begin, China is fully justified to launch her own nuclear attacks against not just the US, but also South Korea.

Of course, this clause should never be limited to SSBNs only. Strategic bombers, fighters and land-based TELs that are capable of carrying and launching nuclear bombs and/or nuclear-tipped missiles too should be included in the clause.

I believe that sometime into the future, Beijing has to deliver a stern warning to their counterparts in Seoul - privately. The message is this - Either the South Koreans can stop the Americans from stationing their nukes that are directly pointed at their neighbour next door (in exchange for Beijing restricting Pyongyang's actions north of the 38th parallel), or they can witness their cities getting flattened with their very own eyes.

Meanwhile, it would be better for China to make this warning public only when sh1t is about to hit the fan, e.g. full-scale war between China and the US is in the horizon, or that visible signs are pointing towards potential nuclear first strikes against China are being actively considered by Washington DC.

Of course (again), this clause should also not be limited to South Korea. Any country(ies) in the Indo-Pacific region whose actions can be interpreted as a complicit of this should also be targetted as a justified nuclear retaliation move by Beijing.
Click to expand...
Problem is, China doesn't have nuclear parity yet. It's gonna take a while to achieve MAD with all those complicit. Even if China's building 60 a year, it would take decades.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top