Hence the logical deduction of what it would take to make that distance, as discussed in subsequent posts.Because of this initial post.
If not then consider it just a typical forum misunderstanding. Cheers
Hence the logical deduction of what it would take to make that distance, as discussed in subsequent posts.Because of this initial post.
If not then consider it just a typical forum misunderstanding. Cheers
The point i was making you brought theoretical figure from wiki without any performance load factor while completely ignoring the capabilities and comfort level of much larger chopper. this evacuation mission surely among the longest mission and there is no evidence smaller choppers are used anywhere for similar duration mission. i would think US and allies in Middleast use US choppers much more extensively in Middleast and Africa than any European chopper. so the confidence on such systems is much higher and they surely are multifunctional. It is completely out of question that any European made or derived chopper will be used for such a mission. Germany had mentioned heavy chopper jointly built with France but they i think dropped it by now and now will have to pay as much as C-17 price.So you can imagine the amount of additional discrete fuel tanks required or even the prospects of necessitating IFR for it to make the 1600mi/2575km vs 1260km (630kmx2) as specced for the MH-47.
Expensive extra requests from Germany and inflation could raise the price to as much as 12 billion euros, the report said, adding that features such as aerial refuelling and special rotor blades were not yet available.
Why are they begging for phone calls then? If what Yellen said is true shouldn’t it be Xi who is desperate for Biden to pick up the phone?
Also, during the Clinton years when the US is undeniably numero uno at almost every important metric, they never had to come out and say that culture of democracy and freedom means that American economy is built on solid foundation blah blah. Reality shows it so no one needs to waste their breath.
"Ignoring" what, exactly? Neither do the CH-47 or MH-47 for that matter have the designed range capability to make the distance as claimed without augmenting their fuel capacity and/or IFR, as already stated ad nauseam, and repeated and reinforced by yourself and others.The point i was making you brought theoretical figure from wiki without any performance load factor while completely ignoring the capabilities and comfort level of much larger chopper. this evacuation mission surely among the longest mission and there is no evidence smaller choppers are used anywhere for similar duration mission. i would think US and allies in Middleast use US choppers much more extensively in Middleast and Africa than any European chopper. so the confidence on such systems is much higher and they surely are multifunctional. It is completely out of question that any European made or derived chopper will be used for such a mission. Germany had mentioned heavy chopper jointly built with France but they i think dropped it by now and now will have to pay as much as C-17 price.
Why are they begging for phone calls then? If what Yellen said is true shouldn’t it be Xi who is desperate for Biden to pick up the phone?
Also, during the Clinton years when the US is undeniably numero uno at almost every important metric, they never had to come out and say that culture of democracy and freedom means that American economy is built on solid foundation blah blah. Reality shows it so no one needs to waste their breath.
Love the optics on this.
China embassy staff stays in-country.
Coordinates evacuation of citizens in war torn country.
US, British, French, German and assorted "leaders of the free world" evacuates embassy.
Tells citizens it is "" to evacuate private citizens caught in-country
I will take a "totalitarian dictatorship" [/s] that looks after it's citizens than a freedumb elected leadership that serves itself ahead of it's electorate.
i am saying these crews are trained on air refueling and long range missions. if smaller choppers have this ability than it would have shown some where. comparison of two very different class of choppers not valid. where price difference even same generation can be 4 times and this high price reflect reliability, comfort, protection and all these add weight hence range penalty. so ranges are not comparable when the capabilities are different. look at Marine 1 why it cost so much."Ignoring" what, exactly? Neither do the CH-47 or MH-47 for that matter have the designed range capability to make the distance as claimed without augmenting their fuel capacity and/or IFR, as already stated ad nauseam, and repeated and reinforced by yourself and others.
I don't know how I can say it any more simple than that. You fly a MH-47 without discrete fuel tanks in its hold, it's gonna crash past 1260km. So tell me, how is it gonna make that remaining 340km with an empty tank?