Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Before shutting down, TikTok should mass broadcast this to all users
The United States, one must remember, does not see countries and borders- it adopts a pre-Westphalian outlook of only looking at the world through a tribalistic lens. In this case, the United States considers itself as the embodiment of a white anglo supremacist West so it's natural that a sitting politician in power like crenshaw would look at Shou Zi Chew and equate him with the CPC since he is ethnically Chinese.
I am therefore of the belief that US hegemony must be destroyed in order for the american politicians to start behaving and acting in a more civilised manner: America Iter Delenda Est
Yawn. More tedious concern trolling ...
Sorry to say this but having empathy for these soldiers is very hard for the harm they have done for others in the name of lies and so called career advancement. Whatever shame they feel right now is nothing compared to the lives they have ruined and destruction caused and ultimately they have to suffer the consequences for doing the unnatural. Really considering their activities, should they be surprised that most of the global south who have suffered under these non educated dogs of war, all feel that death to America is a growing mantra that may finally come true one day. Maybe this video should be a cautionary tale as to what happens when these kinds of invasion take place in the name of lies.
There is a reason way I feel that the likes of Madaline Albright that stupid little bit!h got of easy after uttering the phrase that the hundreds of thousand Iraqi Children that died is worth it. Anyone that has a child would shiver in rage at such sick statements, especially for a woman that have never served in war nor suffered the pain of fighting in one
Last edited:
“By wearing red in Communist China, Elon’s mom has essentially pledged her allegiance to the SeeSeePee and Xinnie the Pooh”
— BBC journalist who wrote the insightful article on what Xi Jinping drinking two cups of tea meant.
Washington lawmakers have also launched two separate bills aimed at allowing the president to ban apps like TikTok on grounds they pose a risk to U.S. national security. But the bills, one in the House of Representatives and the other in the Senate, still need companion bills in the other chamber, as well as enough support to pass both houses and then President Joe Biden's signature. The White House supports the Senate bill, known as the RESTRICT Act. Considered the most likely to succeed, the Act would still likely take at least several months before it could garner enough support for a successful vote and the president's signature. It could also be weakened before it reaches Biden. Even if the RESTRICT Act is passed this year, the Commerce Department has up to six months to begin reviewing transactions with the new authorities, and up to six additional months to complete the reviews and take action.
TikTok is likely to challenge any attempt to ban the app. The company was ultimately successful in quashing Trump's effort to ban the app in the U.S. “The First Amendment protects Americans' right to access social media platforms of their choice," said Jameel Jaffer, the executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. "To justify a TikTok ban, the government would have to demonstrate that privacy and security concerns can't be addressed in narrower ways. The government hasn't demonstrated this, and we doubt it could. Restricting access to a speech platform that is used by millions of Americans every day would set a dangerous precedent for regulating our digital public sphere more broadly,"
TikTok is likely to challenge any attempt to ban the app. The company was ultimately successful in quashing Trump's effort to ban the app in the U.S. “The First Amendment protects Americans' right to access social media platforms of their choice," said Jameel Jaffer, the executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. "To justify a TikTok ban, the government would have to demonstrate that privacy and security concerns can't be addressed in narrower ways. The government hasn't demonstrated this, and we doubt it could. Restricting access to a speech platform that is used by millions of Americans every day would set a dangerous precedent for regulating our digital public sphere more broadly,"