that's not what I said. What I said is PRC's position is right. So you can interpret that as I think it's wrong for Chinese to take up a pro-Russia position. Russia has legitimate security concerns AND it's wrong to invade Ukraine. If we pick a side, we are ignoring the other. We'd be treating partial reality as the whole picture.And why do private Chinese citizens have to take the government's position?
the problem is that Russia has a dilemma like I said:Overtaken by evens. Kiev mayor has confirmed to AP that they are completely Sorrounded and I suspect that was the plan all along.
Russia wants Ukraine intact and has no time for messy urban warfare.
It's just that the interweb is very pro Ukraine and Kiev's propaganda army is doing a stellar job.
The Russian plan is to lay siege, have fire control and wait. Pretty sure Ukraine will be suing for peace in a week or two
that's not what I said. What I said is PRC's position is right. So you can interpret that as I think it's wrong for Chinese to take up a pro-Russia position. Russia has legitimate security concerns AND it's wrong to invade Ukraine. If we pick a side, we are ignoring the other. We'd be treating partial reality as the whole picture.
Like I have said a few times in the past, I think it would be wise for Ukraine to stop resisting, especially if they will be reaching the same outcome at the negotiating table. But that is neutral, not pro-Russia.
BTW, I think the west not stopping NATO expansion and not sending troops but sending weapons so the Ukrainians can fight longer and suffer more is just inhumane.
I’ve been digging mine since Friday!
It just war profiteering, they probably know that Ukraine will be bisected and put the side supported by the west under a massive debt load so they can harvest whatever profit will be made in that region. We enlightened and civilised Europeans did the same thing with the greeks.How are Ukrainian pilots going to suddenly learn how to fly western fighter jets?
This sounds a lot like NATO planning on sending their own airforce in Ukrainian livery. Time find a nuclear bunker....
I can answer this. It seems that, acc. to many pieces and reports I've read through the day, Turkey has asked Ukraine not to share the footages and make Russians angry, and we know that ever since the start of the war, TB-2s have been very active, it's just that they don't share the footages. An another contributing factor is that maybe Ukraine didn't want to attract Russia's attwntion on the drones so that they can keep hunting Russian logistics.There are still questions, like why the TB2s have been absent from action until now. Russian vehicles were driving in from Belarus single file and reached Kiev virtually unopposed, that could have been a Turkey shoot if any drones were operating.
Speaking of SU-34s haven't seen much news of them being deployed and used in combat? I suppose no news is good news in a way for the Russians in this war.Flankers and MIG-31 can stay up the air 4.5 hours easily. Su-34 with external fuel tanks much more. . Syrian airbase is designed to handle now 200 planes and dual runways and deal with drones. how difficult it is when your next to Turkish border. who had own AWACS/ Drones to see flight lines and can inform insurgents living next door.
this Ukraine is much easier operation.
View attachment 83908
View attachment 83907