Miscellaneous News

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member

lately on twitter, Indians, unable to cope with being bullied on twitter, have been projecting their caste system onto China hoping that the white audiences will be ignorant enough to see that maybe casteism ain’t so bad if the ultra modern high speed rail spacefaring Chinese have it.

but to no avail.


The entire episode has been a fascinating example of Indian “izzat”
 

PandaAI

Junior Member
Registered Member
India particularly under Modi is quite incompetent and did not look for oil/gas off of her long coastlines /nor shale oil and ,lacks economic/infrastructure resilience at the national level to protect herself during a crisis and assume that the USA/ west will be always friendly/supportive of india(because we are so anti-China!)-absolutely wrong and the latest physical attack on india is indicative of the world's pushback against indians'scams,fraud ,predatory business /tax practicesand invasive immigration practices -all the modi bowing,kneeling and unwanted hugs/hand holding is for naught in the realpolitik world.

India has weaponised its population by exporting its cheap labour to the world to bring in remittances. Notice every trade deal with India has a clause to ease visas to Indians to enter and work so they can take the limited number of jobs available especially entry level jobs where the local youth work to gain experience. Now these jobs are filled with middle age Indians while local youth unemployment in many countries has skyrocketed.

The global job market is extremely tough as the global economy is struggling after COVID lockdowns, high inflation, trade wars, energy disruptions. Adding to that you have huge numbers of Indians coming in and taking the jobs available in many countries and you see why there is a global pushback against Indian immigration.

Indian future is bleak. AI is replacing their outsourcing industry and China has the supply chains in the manufacturing industry which is now upgrading with AI+Robotics. US and EU want to reindustrialise too so India has more competition.

Overpopulation with a large youth population is a disaster in the age of AI and robotics. That demographic dividend that Indians bragged about is now a major source of their problems.
 

Randomuser

Major
Registered Member

lately on twitter, Indians, unable to cope with being bullied on twitter, have been projecting their caste system onto China hoping that the white audiences will be ignorant enough to see that maybe casteism ain’t so bad if the ultra modern high speed rail spacefaring Chinese have it.

but to no avail.


The entire episode has been a fascinating example of Indian “izzat”
Technically Jack Ma, Elon Musk and Jensen Huang are merchants. Yeah I'm sure some farmer really think they are above them lol. Thats Jai Hind logic speaking. I really don't know how they say this with a straight face.

Indians know that they cannot defend their BS system anymore. So instead they just take everything wrong with their system and project it onto others so the attention isn't on them. I notice a lot of their "memes" are just ones dissing India but badly drawn as someone else and say thats you guys!

Edit: Those dumb jai hinds couldn't even get the order right in their "meme". I guess this what happens when you can't read Hanzi. Watching them trying to larp as Chinese and getting the characters wrong is always entertaining.
 
Last edited:

GulfLander

Brigadier
Registered Member
The Hong Kong government gazetted a bill on Friday that, if passed, would waive salary tax on fund managers’ performance-linked bonuses, so long as they meet certain requirements, in a move to introduce further
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to strengthen the city as a wealth management centre.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

iewgnem

Captain
Registered Member
It seems that many small and medium countries perceive China's generosity as a weakness. They have more respect for theor former colonial powers than for a country that had never hurt them. The A-hole Philippines Defence Minister, have said that Chinese aid during the Iran War oil shortage is received, but with suspicion and without thanks. Then he embraces Japan who had butchered thousands of his people in WW2. There were also other sleazy demands by Indonesia and Congo for China to build their minerals refining industry for free. Why didn't they demand their former colonizers for those?

China needs to be firm with these nations, and treat them with a purely transactional relationship. Who are you to demand that China hand over money and technology, and then you can still push China around? What? Because you can threaten to run to the Japanese and the West if China refuses? Please go ahead! You live and die by your stupidity. These nations need to be taught a lesson in humility.
I mean, scientifically the solution is pretty obvious: for certain countries, if China truly want to improve relations with them, China simply also need butcher thousands of their people. The social-historic reality is, a lot of cultures really do believe the strong has the right to abuse the weak, and they really do believe lack of abuse means lack of strength and as such give them the right to abuse, you really can't project egalitarian beliefs onto everyone.

e.g. if China actually wants to have friendly relations with Japan, China really do have to nuke them, it's literally why the majority of Japaneses believe they didn't lose WW2 to China. If China wants better relations with countries like India or Phillipines, China really do need to colonize them (I know it sounds awful), or simply bomb and butcher them, it really is what they want.

The idea that everyone believes in equality is fundamentally wrong. There really are two kind of cultures in the world: those who believe everyone is equal, that everyone are born the same and deserve the same (egalitarian cultures), and those who believe people are not equal and that it's the right of the better to take from the lesser (primitive cultures).

IMO it's a common and easy mistake for egalitarian cultures to make by assuming everyone else are equals and as such also egalitarian. Egalitarian beliefs really need to be adjusted to take into account objective cultural realities of primitive cultures:

You should only consider those who believe in equality as equals, for those who don't, you really need to treat them like s*, because they will love you if you do and treat you like s* if you don't. If this goes against your egalatarian beliefs, just remember that you're only respecting their culture by treating them like s*, to treat them as equals would be imposing your belief on them and that would be the actual abuse in their eyes.

At an individual level we know there are masocists, that a lot of people do seek to be dominated and abused, it's the exact same at national/cultural level and the way it evolved are exactly the same. We really need to accept objective scientific facts.
 
Last edited:

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member
Technically Jack Ma, Elon Musk and Jensen Huang are merchants. Yeah I'm sure some farmer really think they are above them lol. Thats Jai Hind logic speaking. I really don't know how they say this with a straight face.

Indians know that they cannot defend their BS system anymore. So instead they just take everything wrong with their system and project it onto others so the attention isn't on them. I notice a lot of their "memes" are just ones dissing India but badly drawn as someone else and say thats you guys!

Edit: Those dumb jai hinds couldn't even get the order right in their "meme". I guess this what happens when you can't read Hanzi. Watching them trying to larp as Chinese and getting the characters wrong is always entertaining.
The Izzat that is on display ie brazen lying upon lying to maintain and save face, reminds me of the reputed “chutzpah” in Jewish societies.

These Indians basically went to all the effort and trouble of creating fake twittter profiles and concocting a make believe alternate history China with a caste system. with the same amount of effort they could’ve solved their poo in the loo problem decades ago.

A good elaboration of izzat:

I mean, scientifically the solution is pretty obvious: for certain countries, if China truly want to improve relations with them, China simply also need butcher thousands of their people. The social-historic reality is, a lot of cultures really do believe the strong has the right to abuse the weak, and they really do believe lack of abuse means lack of strength and as such give them the right to abuse, you really can't project egalitarian beliefs onto everyone.

e.g. if China actually wants to have friendly relations with Japan, China really do have to nuke them, it's literally why the majority of Japaneses believe they didn't lose WW2 to China. If China wants better relations with countries like India or Phillipines, China really do need to colonize them (I know it sounds awful), or simply bomb and butcher them, it really is what they want.

The idea that everyone believes in equality is fundamentally wrong. There really are two kind of cultures in the world: those who believe everyone is equal, that everyone are born the same and deserve the same (egalitarian cultures), and those who believe people are not equal and that it's the right of the better to take from the lesser (primitive cultures).

IMO it's a common and easy mistake for egalitarian cultures to make by assuming everyone else are equals and as such also egalitarian. Egalitarian beliefs really need to be adjusted to take into account objective cultural realities of primitive cultures:

You should only consider those who believe in equality as equals, for those who don't, you really need to treat them like s*, because they will love you if you do and treat you like s* if you don't. If this goes against your egalatarian beliefs, just remember that you're only respecting their culture by treating them like s*, to treat them as equals would be imposing your belief on them and that would be the actual abuse in their eyes.

At an individual level we know there are masocists, that a lot of people do seek to be dominated and abused, it's the exact same at national/cultural level and the way it evolved are exactly the same. We really need to accept objective scientific facts.

such cultures would be foolish. Chinese historically don’t do things half assed, when the decision came to remove the Xiongnu, it became a multigenerational, multi decade endeavour until the job was done.
 
Last edited:

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member

lately on twitter, Indians, unable to cope with being bullied on twitter, have been projecting their caste system onto China hoping that the white audiences will be ignorant enough to see that maybe casteism ain’t so bad if the ultra modern high speed rail spacefaring Chinese have it.

but to no avail.


The entire episode has been a fascinating example of Indian “izzat”
Otter gang already made the argument that Guancha must be really important given they have two Shi caste on their staff, Shilao and Wang Shiyi.

Ayi in particular, since his name translates to "King of Shi, first of his name" if you squint a bit with homophones:
007Im6ccgy1ie4xe7pifmj324116j7wi.jpg

Also how can you deny the four tier caste system's existence when ICBC's name literately means "Bank of Gong and Shang", checkmate wumao.
 
Last edited:

Randomuser

Major
Registered Member
Otter gang already made the argument that Guancha must be really important given they have two Shi caste on their staff, Shilao and Wang Shiyi.

Ayi in particular, since his name translates to "King of Shi, first of his name" if you squint a bit with homophones:
View attachment 176620

Also how can you deny the four tier caste system's existence when ICBC's name literately means "Bank of Gong and Shang", checkmate wumao.
Unfortunately the joke will fly over their head since they can't recognize 工商.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
I said over 10 years ago that this union between India and America is doomed to failure as a alliance made in hell. It wasn't hard to see why back then.

India trying to sell its value to the US as a counterbalance to China, even ignoring the very obvious issues with this premise (it's less competent and the US would never allow India to become capable or strong), naturally reduces India's position and defaults American attitude toward India as a cheap pawn. When you give yourself for free, what can you expect?

Outside of completely failing at this task, India has become more of a nuisance to the US in light of how India treats western commands. What use is a soldier who doesn't respond to commands correctly in the time you require?

The dynamic between them is ironic because India simultaneously regards itself as a wiser civilisation while respecting undeniable European/Western industrial and technological might.

Both sides now find themselves in this awkward realisation. Neither is going to extend a hand and the stupidity cycle that introduced this couple in the first place is the same cycle that breaks it apart. It's all very cosmically poetic.

What is next for India? No idea to be honest. It's a complex country. We know the West is doomed to fail. The writing has been on the wall for over 2 decades for those who aren't brainwashed with western supremacy. Right now both are still dangerous to China and are correctly regarded as untrustworthy. US make deals to break when convenient. No different to how Iran should strategise with these peace talks, Israel already hitting Lebanon to instigate further fighting and pull the US back in with its willing supporters within political elites. China handles all these toxic wastes with care.
 
Top