Chinese UCAV/CCA/flying wing drones (ISR, A2A, A2G)

[Deino]

Was this already posted (I‘m still a but behind from the Class-Trip)

 

[Totoro]

Was not. Which base is that?

 

[Confusionism]

Was this already posted (I‘m still a but behind from the Class-Trip)

View attachment 173955

It'd be better if you just post the photo.

In the meantime: So, yes - All the UADFs showcased in the 9-3 parade are very, very real PLAAF projects (if not already in test and evaluation service with the PLAAF by now), rather than being just "muh cardboard mockups" comments by those ignoramous retards elsewhere.

View attachment 163905

 

[Deino]

Thanks

 

[no_name]

Its pretty blurry but looks like the same layout as the J-50.

 

[ACuriousPLAFan]

The first time the carrier-based GJ-21 was videotaped/photographed with its landing gears extended. Notice the catapult launch bar at the front landing gear. Posted by @欧阳振我86468 on Weibo.




Here's a comparison with the GJ-11 with its landing gear deloyed (top photo) versus GJ-21 (bottom photo):

 

[TheWanderWit]

GJ-X and WZ-X were recently spotted together at the Malan Test Base in this new TWZ article, along with the Type A UADF or unseen Type F (?) UADF, or an unknown one altogether:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2050323184524882179

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[ACuriousPLAFan]

GJ-X and WZ-X were recently spotted together at the Malan Test Base in this new TWZ article, along with the Type A UADF or unseen Type F (?) UADF, or an unknown one altogether:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2050323184524882179

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

More on the photos of Malan:



Here's WZ-X:



Here's GJ-X:



Here's UADF Type-A(?)/F(?) and a Y-20A:



And here's an unidentified flying wing UAV which doesn't seem to resemble either the WZ-X or the GJ-X:

 

[Neurosmith]

GJ-X and WZ-X were recently spotted together at the Malan Test Base in this new TWZ article, along with the Type A UADF or unseen Type F (?) UADF, or an unknown one altogether:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2050323184524882179

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I wonder why TWZ implies that ISR is likely the primary role of the GJ-X - with a secondary emphasis on strike - rather than the other way around. The GJ-X's large fuselage and the existence of the WZ-X suggest a strike role for the GJ-X.

 

[CasualObserver]

I wonder why TWZ implies that ISR is likely the primary role of the GJ-X - with a secondary emphasis on strike - rather than the other way around. The GJ-X's large fuselage and the existence of the WZ-X suggest a strike role for the GJ-X.

It's a coping mechanism, they make themselves believe these two aircraft are on trial for the same role (like in the case of Sino-6th gens). And how dare the Chinese -already- have an unmanned bomber the size of a B-21?!

The same goes for their attitude toward aircraft from my country. They’re so biased that anything non-American or even non-European must automatically be inferior because how dare they?!