Israel since last time appears to have tried to adapt iron dome(actual one) to try to get tamir interceptors in path of IRBM grade targets in last despera effort(running attacking warhea to effectively run into one of likely paths).
I hope the pilot manage to steal a F14.
I swear I’ve played this on command and conquer before.His view is this wave of firing makes the story from Washington Post more likely - that'll be the one were they plan to land spec ops, build a runway, then land excavating equipment to dig out the uranium and then transport it away.
I was going to add that the ground radar perhaps doesn’t (or cannot) calculate the intercept point at all, and instead just launches the interceptors and expects them to lock on via terminal homing or IR mid-flight which is where it is too late to intercept anyways.Regardless the excat cause their onboard computers thought they could reach the target at the right time but couldn't. Taking the guidance system (sensor and computer) as a the full package, the interceptors were confused.
The incoming missile did not maneuver, therefor the interceptors must have been launched too late or their computers did not take enough time of travel, angle of approach and distance into their calculations. The onboard computers only discovered the fact very late and had to do such extreme maneuver and missed. If it was jammer on the missile, I would not expect such maneuver since the jamming would have fooled the interceptors to not to follow the warhead instead of turning to chase it.
I would guess it is more likely that the air-defence radar and computers are too slow to response properly even without jamming.
It looks like a F-16What seems to be an F-15 getting targeted, though there is no evidence of it being hit, there is a lot of flares being pumped out while doing evasive maneouvers so it least it gave the pilot a scare until there is evidence of it being hit.
I think this is an older video from couple weeks ago atleast, from a slightly different angle. Anyways, such an abnormally high # of interceptors for one incoming missile suggests a high value target on the ground.
I was going to add that the ground radar perhaps doesn’t (or cannot) calculate the intercept point at all, and instead just launches the interceptors and expects them to lock on via terminal homing or IR mid-flight which is where it is too late to intercept anyways.
It looks like a F-16
I think this is an older video from couple weeks ago atleast, from a slightly different angle. Anyways, such an abnormally high # of interceptors for one incoming missile suggests a high value target on the ground.
OSINT bros says its a F-15I was going to add that the ground radar perhaps doesn’t (or cannot) calculate the intercept point at all, and instead just launches the interceptors and expects them to lock on via terminal homing or IR mid-flight which is where it is too late to intercept anyways.
It looks like a F-16
I think this is an older video from couple weeks ago atleast, from a slightly different angle. Anyways, such an abnormally high # of interceptors for one incoming missile suggests a high value target on the ground.
I wonder if news-media-journos re gonna spin this as 'military division' as they do when putin or xi kicks some military guy out.Purge will continue until morale improves.
Apparently the reason was more about The general was resisting to remove 2 black and 2 female names from list of 1 star general promotions.His view is this wave of firing makes the story from Washington Post more likely - that'll be the one were they plan to land spec ops,
This bit is the same as the F15 one



Wait it could be F16 tooI wonder if news-media-journos re gonna spin this as 'military division' as they do when putin or xi kicks some military guy out.
Esp considering he purged 12 of them last night not just 1.
Apparently the reason was more about The general was resisting to remove 2 black and 2 female names from list of 1 star general promotions.
He fired him.
This bit is the same as the F15 one
It crashed in central iran View attachment 172850
View attachment 172851
View attachment 172852
