This strike bears a striking resemblance with how Nasrallah was assassinated. multiple depth penetrating warheads to reach the bunkers needed to take out the target.
Juicy targets in these bunkers?Hopefully it is not the type of aid Israel allowed/sent into Gaza and Lebanon laden with exploitive devices, disease, etc.
Many Euro countries did sign up for the war though. French already landed in Iraq.
3rd Temple politics is the evidence. The non-Zionist Jews believe you cannot enter the holy lands before the Moschiach arrives - Zionist Jews believe the opposite. Interestingly, both the Torah and the Talmud prohibits the construction of the Temple using iron tools (no iron hammers, nails, screws, bolts, machinery, etc). The previous temples were constructed using a legendary item called the Shamir which disappeared forever. So, you can see that the Zionists, even the religious ones, don't really care about the mandatory religious requirements. The aim is obviously something else.
Lisan al Gaib is probably taken from a similar Shia belief,
Offcourse as our esteemed colleague would say, there is very obvious "C word" in the headline, but there are further juicy bits as well,The opning line of this article:
Mounting miscalculations and a retreat to narrow self-interest by major countries, including the United States and China, are threatening to turn the current conflict in Iran into a global crisis for the supply of refined oil products.
Answer for your first question is offcourse Barron would be Grandpa Trump, that also narrow down maternal grandson (spawn of Ivanka and the ring wraith Kushner)So... the Western pedo elites are trying to create a Lisan al Gaib? And who is it supposed to be, Barron? lol
edit: or maybe this is where Frank Herbert got the idea in the first place, since Lisan al Gaib is an Arabic phrase after all
I was waiting for someone who actually knew, to enter the fray.The criteria are fundamentally different. In Revelation it is stated that war in the holy land will break out and that a third temple will be constructed. There however the antichrist will come, as well as the beast from the land and a beast from the sea. Together they will do many wonders and many people will believe them to be with/to be God and the Messiah. When in fact they, as usual, deceive the masses.
In secterian context it's rather important, because the Bible itself and Christendom overall makes a distinction between the Jews and the Gentiles who have found Salvation in Christ, the actual Messiah. Which boils more or less down to people who believe in Christ, his resurrection and on God to be the new Israelites/God's people under the covenant made with God through Christ. The Jews, as they are known today, are of the school of the pharisees, i.e. adhering to the Babylonian talmud, unrepentent dogma and in general opposition to the Gospel, as has been the case during the times of Christ on earth.
Most Christians reject the Ideology of evangelicals, because for one, you cannot force God's hand. It will play out when it will play out, and you are not even close to powerful enough to bring this about before the time has come, to which even Christ stated that not even he knows when this time will be, only the Father (God) does. To most, including to me as I consider myself a believing Christian, this is invoking a sense of itentions to bring about the antichrist. Which, as the false Messiah will be worshipped in the third temple. That jewish eshtalogy says that their Messiah will come with the third temple (and them having rejected the true Messiah before and after being raised from the dead), well you can imagine what I and others think about this. Ultimately, any Christian who is a Zionist or supportive of this is a strange case, because Zionist and jewish views are inherently incompatible with Christian views. There are more similarities between Christianity and Islam than between Judaism and any other religion.
Also Zionism is not completely detached from religion/judaism. It is a secular interpretation of judaism, as a substitute for regular ethno-nationalisn but it ultimately has it's entire foundation in the torah, tanakh and obviously the less than well looked upon talmud.
No surprises on the position of the wife of the former PM. Singapore will more than likely side with the smaller nation in any conflict.
Ho Ching is a private citizen, her views do not represent Singapore's views, just as Michelle Obama's views do not represent America's.
Ho Ching is a private citizen, her views do not represent Singapore's views, just as Michelle Obama's views do not represent America's.