Miscellaneous News

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
I am really surprised by this, because Ai Weiwei is old, and old people rarely change their minds about anything.

The anti-China people in the world will have a very difficult year.

Next visitor to China will be Merz, then Trump!

:D
Yeah he's old but this is no regular level of fking up that the US is doing. 70 year old white bearded old patriotic veterans are freaked out about how evil the US has become after ICE in Minnesota. It's not quite as bad in Europe but it's pretty shitty seeing how much freedom was rolled back in the UK/Germany as Russia invaded the Ukraine.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
Let’s have some humility and definitely stay away from the mushrooms—they’re not good for you!


Okay, to re-hash what should be the truth about growth potential to the Chinese economy, it was what the CCP thought about in those last months of the pandemic.

It has been a while, so I forget, but it is pretty basic.

We should just consider, what are the growth drivers to the Chinese economy? We can just list a few.
  • consumers
  • real estate
  • manufacturing
  • exports
  • high-tech manufacturing
  • infrastructure building
  • lower interest rates
  • fiscal policy stimulus
There are probably more, but we get the point. I remember reading about such discussions, blah blah blah.

What is the point?

Imagine ourselves as the CCP, like in a video game. How are we going to stimulate the economy after the pandemic?

Well, that is the point. Chinese government had a lot of policy choices, and they were in position to act out on any of them. In contrast, with inflation brewing and the national debt and the budget deficit, the US government has far more constraints to consider when they think about monetary and fiscal policies.

To say the Chinese economy is struggling, is truly brain dead.

Sure, in economics, nothing is ever perfect. When it is perfect, that is the exact moment the market goes down.

If the CCP wanted to solve deflation, just go for it, flood the system with money, reflate the property market, and that will get things going.

However, is that really a good idea? Probably better just live with the deflation for the next little while.

That is the point. The CCP has many policies or tactics available to them to readjust the Chinese economy. They do not have to use all of those levers at the same time.

They can use one CCP lever for now, then use another CCP lever for later. It depends. No rush. The future will come soon enough.

All this talk about the Chinese economy doing badly, which suggest the CCP is helpless, well, we can see how good a job comrade Chang does.

:cool:
 

Lethe

Captain
I like to check in on Hugh White from time to time, as one of the more prescient and insightful Australian observers of the developing contest between the United States and China and the choices that portends for us. Still, I certainly did not expect to come across a four hour book club discussion:


Entertainment for the TikTok generation this is not. Hugh really is a wonderful communicator. He has the patient and cautious air one associates with academic types, but without the verbose and convoluted language that often comes along for the ride. Above all, the impression is of a learned conversation, rather than an ideologue pushing a particular narrative. I particularly appreciated his comments towards the end of their discussion on Donald Kagan's The Outbreak of the Peloponnesian War on maintaining a sense of human moral agency in the face of narratives that X is inevitable or that Y is the only path available (~5 minutes from
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
).

Having listened to this discussion twice over now, mostly while on the bicycle, I just wanted to follow up with a few comments.

The first is both comment and clarification: although Hugh White has spent the last quarter-century or so writing and speaking about the implications of a rising China for Australia, this discussion rarely addresses China directly, though brief analogies between historical events and contemporary circumstances are made with some regularity. Rather, the discussion is White's account of the works that have shaped his intellectual worldview. At one point White addresses this obvious China-shaped lacuna in the manner that would be expected of a realist: by pointing to the structural similarities shared between otherwise distinct nations, cultures and eras of history.

Of the books discussed, E.H. Carr's 'The Twenty Years' Crisis: 1919-1939' is the only one I've read. There's a line from Carr that has always remained with me, as he attempted to navigate a path between the contrasting dangers of supposed "objective" history on the one hand, and an unbound relativism or narrative imagination on the other. I'm probably paraphrasing a little here: "Just because a mountain appears to take on different shapes from different aspects, does not mean that it therefore has an infinity of shapes, or no shape at all."

Having read bits and pieces of Kennan over the years (mostly from 'The Kennan Diaries'), I was surprised to hear in this discussion that Kennan devotes a considerable portion of 'American Diplomacy' to examining the course of American relations with Japan, including in relation to its conduct in China. Previously, my impression had been that Kennan's attention was largely devoted to Russia, the Soviet Union, and the European aspect of the Cold War.

Folks might enjoy
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. I've paraphrased for brevity:

J. Walker: If you could require every Australian statesman to read only one of these books that we've discussed, which would you choose?
H. White: A.J.P Taylor's 'Origins of the Second World War'. It's the starkest and most challenging.
J. Walker: And for the CPC's Politburo?
H. White: They've read them all.

While I don't anticipate that more than a few people are really interested in a >4hr discussion, I think White's
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
are worth attending to, as he sweeps across and brings together a number of different strands of the perspective that he has articulated at greater length elsewhere: the growth in China's power that currently makes Australia so uncomfortable will be joined in future decades by the growth of India and Indonesia. That the United States will likely not continue to play the strategic role in Asia that it has in decades past. That adaptation to these circumstances will require Australians to re-evaluate how we conceive of ourselves and our nation. That Australia's political class appears incapable of seriously attending to these matters beyond the presumption of ongoing American supremacy, and that AUKUS is a leading exhibit of this failure of imagination.
 
Last edited:

_killuminati_

Captain
Registered Member
I seriously believe that every accusation is a confession at this point given how the USA and Israel love to paint China in this terrible light. I wouldn’t want to be born a Jew or American in the coming century, cause if the truth comes out to confirm what most people more or less suspects, antisemitism is going to be the least of their worries. There is a breaking point eventually and genocides plus organ farming on an industrial scale being done on the innocent isn’t going to come without consequences that should the sheer depths be established to the world proper without the USA being able to gaslight the truth away, no amount of Murdoch media is going to save these people from some serious retribution that will make the French Revolution look like child’s play. Seriously the most sickening part is that it’s taking a very long time for justice to come to these sick bastards
Breaking point is inevitable and I'm afraid the retribution will make the Holocaust look like a joke. All it takes is a severely traumatized person in a position of power to exact a hate-filled revenge, going beyond limits. And Israel has done well to create such persons; children with family members who were murdered, raped, tortured, or suffered under all kinds of evil that Israel does.

I suspect Israel will succeed in gathering all or most Jews from around the world by making it unsafe for them everywhere else, and then, one major disaster, a loss of control, and an outside power will do the deed and genocide the entirety of Jewry in revenge. I'm sure Israelis are aware of this possibility and their strategy may be to just wipe out all of the neighbors completely.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Whats the point of having all these legal contracts if they can just be thrown out by the government?
Your money can reach as far as your military can reach

Since the PLA cannot credibly reach Panama, Chinese assets there are open for Panama and the US to steal them


Others can play the same game you know.
When your military cannot reach there, only thing you can do is reciprocate by domestic (exports/imports sanctions) means or throw your weight internationally to indirectly damage them


will Darwin port have same scenario?
Australia is easier for PLA to reach but it's still not a credible reach. However, China has vast domestic means to damage Australia so it's unknown if Australia will have the guts to do the same thing. However letting your assets to get stolen left and right for sure will send the wrong signal to the rest of the world.


- - -
Fundamentally, I never believe in money or assets. I only believe in big pointy missiles and warplanes. When 7th gen sub-orbital bombers are developed with (almost) worldwide reach, thats when I will believe in money again
 
Top