Makes sense, considering that more than half of the bridge still stands, so it's not really a construction problem. Anyway, do we have casualty reports?
Makes sense, considering that more than half of the bridge still stands, so it's not really a construction problem. Anyway, do we have casualty reports?
The headline of that news.cn piece says "No Casualties". Cracks were spotted on Nov 10. Traffic through the bridge was cut off on the same day.Makes sense, considering that more than half of the bridge still stands, so it's not really a construction problem. Anyway, do we have casualty reports?
Damn, what bridge is that? Does anybody know?
Let's speculate here.The headline of that news.cn piece says "No Casualties". Cracks were spotted on Nov 10. Traffic through the bridge was cut off on the same day.
Probably accumulated pressure from shifting substrate leading up to the landslide that exceeded the predicted parameters of operation caused the cracks. It kept increasing as more substrate shifted until the threshold for landslide but by that time, the cracks warned the people in charge that disaster was impending. They probably didn't know that shifting soil weight caused the cracks until the landslide occurred; when they shut the bridge down, they likely didn't know if it was structural failure due to construction error/miscalculation or other forces. The landslide validated that it was the latter.Let's speculate here.
So, cracks appeared 2 days ago before the landslide. Do you think the cracks were related to the landslide? Or is it just poor build quality, which I partially disagree with?