I've been thinking. Is a civilian VCE turbofan feasible?
hard to say, "Mach 4" has appeared a lot in publicly available materials recently, like aerodynamic simulations for dropping HCM, all of these suggesting a of SR-72-like concept.
Of course, if there’s interest in supersonic commercial airliners (but you’d have to solve a number of other problems too).I've been thinking. Is a civilian VCE turbofan feasible?
Remember that hypersonic aircraft that circled the globe? I believe 7th gen will be like that. A fat HGV like aircraft that breach limit of traditional air based design that can appear anywhere on the planet within few hours. I guess you can say every fighter is a strategic bomber. We are reaching multi role of a new definition.Oh i'm sure they are. As we discussed previously about the current stated design practice in China, by the time the flight articles of the current generation are in flight testing, they are actively looking ahead at the next generation. J-36 and J-50 fly, so now the 7th generation is under active research.
What if J-50 and J-36 will have different VCE engines? J-36 is evidently designed for long-range, high-speed, high-altitude CAP over neutral or enemy hostile airspace, while J-50 is far more conventional. Wouldn't a XA-100/103 concept engine work better for the J-50? China doesn't seem to lack funding nor personnel for running several advanced projects in parallel afterall.
Remember that hypersonic aircraft that circled the globe? I believe 7th gen will be like that. A fat HGV like aircraft that breach limit of traditional air based design that can appear anywhere on the planet within few hours. I guess you can say every fighter is a strategic bomber. We are reaching multi role of a new definition.
Every J-70 can do what H-20 does.
I was confused at why it was being suggested this VCE was a civilian project, but the optimization for high supersonic speeds would make sense for a spaceplane project.J-36 doesn't really seem optimized as a planform for Mach 3+
I was confused at why it was being suggested this VCE was a civilian project, but the optimization for high supersonic speeds would make sense for a spaceplane project.
Nope. J-36/J-XX both platforms will share same propulsion.. it will be nightmare to produce and maintain two different high end cycle Engine platforms.What if J-50 and J-36 will have different VCE engines? J-36 is evidently designed for long-range, high-speed, high-altitude CAP over neutral or possibly hostile airspace, while J-50 is far more conventional. Wouldn't a XA-100/103 concept engine work better for the J-50? China doesn't seem to lack funding nor personnel for running several advanced projects in parallel afterall.