Said who?And that's great from the USA point of view. I think the USA should have done that quite a while ago because now it's hard to take china and Russia down. After all, the world dominated by the USA is better than the world dominated by china. Investing and outsourcing in China through 90s and 00s has backfired astronomically. I know some users didn't like reading this comment but that's likely how American Intel agencies think now. Helping china and Russia in 00s was a total market failure; for a short term gains, sacrificing long term sustainability is a type of market failure that even Adam Smith advised against in his epic works.
It's only good for the west, for the rest of the world it's been a catastrophic failure. When you harvest most of the world's wealth because the system is designed to favor you then of course you'll think it's good for "the world". The same fatigue the west feels about immigrants is the same fatigue the rest of the world feel about western domination. It has had its run but it has to come to an end, the world has to re balance itself.
Imagine if Trump had been president of the US in the 1990s or the 2000s? Scary. I'm glad China has grown powerful enough to check him and give the rest of the world an alternative.


