KJ-600 carrierborne AEWC thread & possible KY-600 (?) COD aircraft

by78

General
A few more.

54765306458_af1cdcea11_o.jpg

54765308838_9b79ee2fda_o.jpg

54765303179_eb5ac1d69c_o.jpg

54765308828_5b662479c1_o.jpg

54765305004_717d0b9a0d_k.jpg

54765305638_eac87b4591_k.jpg

54765304024_e60868fa8e_k.jpg

54765302809_093c9edde2_k.jpg
 

Tomboy

Senior Member
Registered Member
1757056807857.png
IMO, it seems KJ-600 unfortunately still uses WJ-6, the annular intake is still there while I'm pretty sure AEP400/500 uses different intake as seen with models and the testbed. I wonder why they would still use WJ-6 despite the rumors about unsatisfactory performance of that model.54047284514_53f807240e_o.jpg
 

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I wonder why they would still use WJ-6 despite the rumors about unsatisfactory performance of that model.

Well... what other broad category of reason could it be?

"Why aren't they using a new engine which is said to be better than an older engine" -- except for rare exceptions, the answer is generally always the same nature overall. I.e.; the new engine is not yet ready for prime time serial frontline use for whatever reason.
 

Tomboy

Senior Member
Registered Member
new engine is not yet ready for prime time serial frontline use for whatever reason.
This, as far as I know AEP500 is fully ready but they are not using it. There were alot of claims previously about KJ-600 with AEP400/500 before as well.


PS: Or actually maybe it is AEP400 via this illustration
9f519e8bgy1hudvjoxu6kj20j609bwf0.jpg
 
Top