Chinese shipbuilding industry

Nevermore

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Clarkson's July data for the new shipbuilding market has been released, showing that the sharp decline in new ship orders since the beginning of the year continues, with monthly order volumes halving again, and Chinese shipyards once again topping the rankings!
According to data released by Clarkson on August 12, global new ship orders in July totaled 2.03 million corrected gross tons (58 vessels). Based on corrected gross tons, this represents a 58% year-on-year decline from the same period last year (4.87 million corrected gross tons) and a 43% month-on-month decline from the previous month (3.54 million corrected gross tons).

By country, Chinese shipyards secured 1.52 million CGT (43 vessels), accounting for 75% of the market share, ranking first globally; South Korean shipyards secured 0.33 million CGT (8 vessels), accounting for 16% of the market share, closely following behind. The difference in market share between the two reached as high as 59%.

Data shows that from January to July this year, the global total of new ship orders was 23.26 million CGT (788 vessels), a sharp decrease of 51% compared to the same period last year (47.65 million CGT, 1,973 vessels). During this period, Chinese shipyards received orders totaling 13.03 million CGT (463 vessels), accounting for 56% of the market share, a decrease of 59% compared to the same period last year, ranking first; South Korean shipyards received orders totaling 5.24 million CGT (123 vessels), accounting for 23% of the market share, a decrease of 37% compared to the same period last year, ranking second.
 

lcloo

Major
Isn't some level of competition good? I would think that ideally, there should be at least two entities in each industrial sector.
There will still be competition, but it will be competing against South Korean and Japanese, though having two competitors domestically does have incentive on renovation.

Before the merger, both companies (CSSC and CSIC) are subsidiary of China State Shipping Group. It was similar to AVIC Group where they have Xi'an AVIC, Shenyang AVIC, Chengdu AVIC etc.

IMO, merger of CSSC and CSIC means that they can build a ship assemble from modules fabricated at different locations owned by CSSC and CSIC with minimum red tapes shorten the project timelines, under a central control from head office, maximise work specialization of each shipyard.
 
Last edited:

iewgnem

Senior Member
Registered Member
Isn't some level of competition good? I would think that ideally, there should be at least two entities in each industrial sector.
There are still competition: foreign companies still have 25% global market share, among which Koreans shipbuilders still have 16% global market share, Chinese companies can compete among themselves after annihilating all non Chinese competition.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
There can still be competitions between the subsidiary companies. Large SOEs are more like extensions of the governments. I'd imagine that profit isn't the most important KPI for their management.

I would be very surprised if profit is not one of the KPIs ... profit is great for the govt revenue , also to enable more R & D spending and capital expenditure
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
I would be very surprised if profit is not one of the KPIs ... profit is great for the govt revenue , also to enable more R & D spending and capital expenditure

@SanWenYu said that profit is "not one of the most important KPIs", not that profit is not one of the KPIs. These two phrases mean different things.
 
Last edited:
Top