Among the three nuclear Triad - SSBN, land based ICBM (and other missiles types with nuclear warheads) and Strategic nuclear bombers, the slow progress of long range bomber over the last 2 decades may indicated that PLA or CMC's priority is on land based ICBM and SSBN.
China has a geographical disadvantage of basing strategic bomber vs the US. US has air bases from Alaska, Haiwaii, Guam, Midway island, Australia, Diego Garcia in Indian Ocean that can accomodate B-1, B-2, B-21 and B-52 bombers, the distances from these bases to China Mainland is relatively short compare to the distances that PLAAF bombers need to fly to continental USA.
The longer the time that you need to fly to your launching point, the greater the chances of your bomber get detected.
Thus, I think H20 might be prioritised for attack against these US bases instead of continental USA, the aim would be to deny availability of foward airbases for US bombers. Though having the range to reach East coast of US will be useful and H20 should be able to do this, but not as its main designated mission.
Atomisation of US mainland bases and facilities would be the jobs of SSBN and ICBM as they may have higher rates of successful penetrating US defenses.