US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
Block 1 of the CCA will not have onboard radars or weapons bay due to cost and development progress. Later blocks will gradually incorporate them but in the case of something like Anduril which has a single large vertical slab, VLO is not part of the design.
So, taking the same path than F-35... will take block 4 and 20+ years before reaching some capabilities.
 

Lethe

Captain
Link to article in post:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I don't know (or care) much about the details of these platforms, but to go from "air-droppable from a C-130J" to "one vehicle per C-17 only" is an impressive level of design/requirements creep that does indeed suggest a program that was less than fully thought through from the outset. Like setting out to build a Gripen and ending up with an F-15EX.

In any case, the program is now
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
:

An Army official today confirmed that the service will stop producing Humvees and Joint Light Tactical Vehicles. And General Dynamics Land Systems will be told to stop producing its brand new light tank, the M10 Booker. (The Wall Street Journal first reported on those cuts.) “The Booker is a classic example of sunk cost fallacy, and the Army doing something wrong,” [Army Secretary] Driscoll said. “We wanted to develop a small tank that was agile and could be dropped into places our regular tanks can’t. We got a heavy tank.”
 
Last edited:

supersnoop

Colonel
Registered Member
Block 1 of the CCA will not have onboard radars or weapons bay due to cost and development progress. Later blocks will gradually incorporate them but in the case of something like Anduril which has a single large vertical slab, VLO is not part of the design.
If this is not a real VLO design, then is this really just a modern version of "J-6 turned into a drone"?
 
Top