plawolf
Lieutenant General
As MAGA Americans love to scream: Go back to China!
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
As MAGA Americans love to scream: Go back to China!
Xi & Co.: "You could not live with your own failures. Where did that bring you? Back to me."
Greater intimacy?? Please.. Xi is a married man, a family man.
A lot of westoids are really deluded and think Vietnam will somehow team up with America over China.
Vietnam has over 1000 years of dealing with China. There are ups and downs but ultimately, it knows how to balance out China well enough. The first top exam scorer is famous for being able to negotiate a deal the Song dynasty.
Meanwhile America has already shown how unhinged it can get.
Cn FM talk abt US statement on Xizang.
"The U.S. move blatantly interferes in Xizang affairs, which are China’s internal affairs. This gravely contravenes international law and the basic norms governing international relations. China strongly deplores and firmly rejects this. Let me stress that Xizang is an open region. We have never issued regulations restricting foreigners entering Xizang. Every year, Xizang receives a large number of foreign tourists and people of various sectors. In 2024 alone, 320,000 foreign tourists visited Xizang. In light of the region’s special geographical and climatic conditions, the Chinese government has taken some regulatory and protection measures in accordance with laws and regulations regarding foreigners entering the region. This is completely necessary. Foreigners are welcome to visit, travel and do business in China’s Xizang region, but they must abide by China’s laws and relevant regulations. We reject groundless vilification of Xizang’s human rights, religious and cultural cause, and oppose foreign officials’ interference and sabotage in the name of performing their duties in Xizang."
"The U.S. move blatantly interferes in Xizang affairs, which are China’s internal affairs. This gravely contravenes international law and the basic norms governing international relations. China strongly deplores and firmly rejects this. Let me stress that Xizang is an open region. We have never issued regulations restricting foreigners entering Xizang. Every year, Xizang receives a large number of foreign tourists and people of various sectors. In 2024 alone, 320,000 foreign tourists visited Xizang. In light of the region’s special geographical and climatic conditions, the Chinese government has taken some regulatory and protection measures in accordance with laws and regulations regarding foreigners entering the region. This is completely necessary. Foreigners are welcome to visit, travel and do business in China’s Xizang region, but they must abide by China’s laws and relevant regulations. We reject groundless vilification of Xizang’s human rights, religious and cultural cause, and oppose foreign officials’ interference and sabotage in the name of performing their duties in Xizang."
Best not to make any assumptions about that. They have developed weapons specifically for that purpose.
Nobody is denying that a disparity exists between China and Taiwan. However the disparity between China and Taiwan is smaller than that between the US and Iran (at least in military terms). The former was never my argument.
Logistically-speaking, the US is much more advantageously positioned not only because of their sealift capability but also due to their stand-off weapons capability. They wouldn't need to worry about Iran targeting Diego Garcia because the latter is simply out of range. This of course wouldn't even apply in real life because the US isn't planning to launch a land invasion of Iran. My point is that a potential Iran operation would be much simpler and less risky (for the attacker) vis-a-vis a Taiwan operation.
I think you just answered your own question.
Of course a Taiwan operation would need boots on the ground. This is a discussion for another thread, but a regime-change operation like a Taiwan scenario has a different endgame than "hit-the-reactor" situations like Iran (and historically Syria).
Again, the premise isn't that China doesn't have a military advantage over Taiwan. Iran's collection of ballistic missiles (many of which are older liquid-fueled variants), when pitted against standoff US airpower, presents much less of a threat compared to hundreds or thousands of Taiwanese supersonic or high-subsonic cruise missiles heading for targets only 100 km away.
This will be my last thoughts on the matter, at the risk of going OT.
He just mark himself for deportation, let's see what his new remark will be when it happen....lol