Miscellaneous News

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
It could give China the incentive that they need it to put tariffs and taxes to Western gasoline cars to phase them out in favor of EVs, let see what happens.
No. Actually the really smart play is to raise export tariff Chinese EV technology and products to US and subside ICE tech + component exports to the US

This should help lower US' ICE car prices and increase their EV car prices. This would instantly delay it's EV adoption and thus development of its EV industry and all other related electrification-industries. Meanwhile China would hop on the EV and electrification train and leave US in the dust by enjoying electrification benefits throughout the country and across all the industries

You don't need to work hard to counter-punch, you can instead beat him down by giving him a bunch of free ICE stuff.

Work smart, not hard.
 

Minm

Junior Member
Registered Member
India has been "developing" the Chabahar Port for 20+ years and still not complete. It's like another LCA Tejas. Everytime US put sanctions on Iran, India was the first one to pull out. What changes now?

India was after Chabahar mainly to assert it's economic influence in Afghanistan. Build a port close to Afghanistan, build a new rail line from the port to Afghanistan. It was doable originally with a friendly puppet government of Karzai and Ghani set up by US. Now those guys are gone and Taliban are in. India had always been against Taliban, actively working against it, supported it's removal from power by NATO. In fact, when Taliban took Kabul in 2021, the very first thing they uttered regarding India was "Indians have always been traitors". The rail was never built.

So, what purpose exactly is this port serving for India? Especially considering the fact that India does not even recognize the new Afghanistan as a country. What can it do now for India that existing Iranian ports i.e. at Bandar Abbas cannot? Once India began to see it's Afghan prospects dwindle, despite making some investments, they shifted the goalpost to "this Chabahar project will give us a rail connection to Russia and Europe".. which is quite idiotic considering that the much larger Bandar Abbas port is already operational with an existing rail connection.

I said once previously that Indian decisionmaking and strategy is spontaneous, often devoid of long-term implications and regional developments. Hence they lose out on former projects and get sucked in to sunk-cost fallacies such as this port.
I don't think there's much to be done at the port without the railway link to take care of the cargo. But the railway is being built, so once chabahar is connected to the rest of the country, large scale transport to Russia can commence.

You can use exactly the same arguments as what you use against the port at Gwadar. Why not simply expand Karachi, which wouldn't require building a railway line through a remote region with a terrorism problem?
 

canonicalsadhu

Junior Member
Registered Member
The rest of the world clearly sees the US unable to compete and forced to retreat into its small garden with protectionism, bloc confrontation, ideological dogmatism, while it begrudgingly cedes the mantle of global leadership to China, which is becoming increasingly self-confident and the new champion of globalization and free trade.
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
No. Actually the really smart play is to raise export tariff Chinese EV technology and products to US and subside ICE tech + component exports to the US

This should help lower US' ICE car prices and increase their EV car prices. This would instantly delay it's EV adoption and thus development of its EV industry and all other related electrification-industries. Meanwhile China would hop on the EV and electrification train and leave US in the dust by enjoying electrification benefits throughout the country and across all the industries

You don't need to work hard to counter-punch, you can instead beat him down by giving him a bunch of free ICE stuff.

Work smart, not hard.
I think EV is adoption is pretty much going down in the West, especially in the US due US companies treating EV cars as priced luxury cars, lack of infrastructure and other issues. This tariffs could be the last nail in the coffin because very low prices could be the only thing that will make consumers to buy EVs. Now companies like the few US EVs companies don't have cut prices as much and ICE cars manufacturers don't have to get into EVs anymore of they don't face the threat of much cheaper electric cars.
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
Anwar is surprisingly based. There used to be a time he was considered a western plant by some people
Yes, Anwar even surprised me with his based foreign policy. He used be a darling of the NED. But nowadays, he is being attacked by the NED media and NGOs in Malaysia quite regularly. Its a good indication that he is not a Western puppet.

Nevertheless, Anwar is currently PM of a coalition government. Some sections of his coalition government are still corrupt and racist. This weakens his hand, impeding him from truly carrying out his vision to reform Malaysia. Its all because of democracy. Most of the Malay majority in Malaysia are still clinging onto the old politics of Malay Muslim supremacy and affirmative action for their race. They are the main reason why Malaysia can never move forward.
 
Last edited:

CasualObserver

Junior Member
Registered Member
This is basically just pre-election populism.

They know it won't work. They know tariffs are a bad move.

But they have to do it, because the average voting American is a moron who gets a thrill seeing big bad Chyna get targeted
It's not just the Americans who are like this. Give these people a "big baddie" and then control them just as you wish, only this time China happened to be the enemy. It was the Middle East, the Muslims at the start of the century, and now it became China.

I'm not saying there's a right or wrong side, but that's unfortunately the truth.
 
Last edited:
Top