Miscellaneous News

Equation

Lieutenant General
Latest on the bombing at Bangkok's Erawan shrine:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




1231324.jpg
It's not the Turkish government that are responsible but rather the militant terrorist groups living in Turkey. Interpol (requested from the Thai government) so far has done an excellent job finger printing all these thugs and criminals.
 
It's not the Turkish government that are responsible but rather the militant terrorist groups living in Turkey. Interpol (requested from the Thai government) so far has done an excellent job finger printing all these thugs and criminals.

The Turkish government is very much responsible for biased inflammatory anti-China rhetoric amounting to lies or endorsement of lies regarding the Uighur situation in China, especially concerning the 2009 Urumqi riots. This directly fuels instigation of violence and probably terrorism against Chinese targets.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
The Turkish government is very much responsible for biased inflammatory anti-China rhetoric amounting to lies or endorsement of lies regarding the Uighur situation in China, especially concerning the 2009 Urumqi riots. This directly fuels instigation of violence and probably terrorism against Chinese targets.

To be fair, I don't think its as much the Turkish government as it is elements within Turkey's elite who owns or have significant influence on certain papers and news channels within Turkey.

Even president Recep Erdogan seemed to have been fooled, and made some very unwise and highly inflammatory and offensive remarks before Chinese officials met with him and showed him evidence of what was actually happening in Xinjing. After which he publically apologies to China about those remarks.

But good luck finding that apology in the western press.
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
Chile quake triggers mass evacuation and tsunami alert

One million people had to leave their homes in Chile after a powerful quake hit the country's central region.

At least eight people died when the 8.3-magnitude quake hit. One person is still missing.

Residents of Illapel, near the quake's epicentre, fled into the streets in terror as their homes began to sway.

In the coastal town of Coquimbo, waves of 4.7m (15ft) hit the shore. A tsunami alert was issued for the entire Chilean coast but has since been lifted.

Tsunami waves also hit the coast further north and south of the quake's epicentre, with waves half a metre higher than usual as far north as La Punta.

The quake lasted for more than three minutes and there have been dozens of aftershocks.

Gloria Navarro, who lives in the coastal town of La Serena, said people were "running in all directions".

At the scene: Jane Chambers, freelance journalist

I'm on the coast about 130km (80 miles) south from the worst affected area of Coquimbo. Our house is on top of a cliff and made of wood. It was shaking and shuddering.

At first I thought it was just a tremor but it was really strong and went on for around three minutes. It was much stronger than any tremors I had ever felt before.

The house is fine as most of Chile's buildings are built to withstand tremors.

The local town was evacuated. The restaurant down on the beach is flooded but most things here are returning to normal.

Officials said 1,800 people in Illapel were left without drinking water.

Electricity providers said hundreds of thousands of their clients in the worst-affected Coquimbo region had no power.

The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the tremor struck off the coast of Coquimbo, 46km (29 miles) west of the city of Illapel at 19:54 local time (22:54 GMT).

The USGS said it was at a depth of 25km, while Chilean seismologists calculated its depth at 11km.

Analysis: Jonathan Amos, BBC Science Correspondent

The quake that rocked Chile on Wednesday was five times more energetic than the one that devastated Nepal back in April. And yet the early indications are that the death toll will be a fraction (perhaps a thousandth) of what it was in the Himalayan nation.

In large part, this is simply down to preparedness. This was Chile's third massive quake in five years; the region all too frequently experiences magnitude 8 events. As a consequence, the building codes are strict and generally well enforced.

What is more, the people themselves are well versed in how to react during and after an event.

It is not perfect. In 2010, an 8.8-magnitude quake witnessed failings on the part of the monitoring network and the system for alerting people to the imminent tsunami threat.

Since then, the Chilean government has spent millions upgrading the country's seismic network of sensors, and made improvements to telecommunications systems that share critical information and warnings.

The earthquake struck as thousands of Chileans were travelling to the coast ahead of a week of celebrations for independence day.

President Michelle Bachelet said some of the official festivities would be cancelled.

The authorities were quick to issue tsunami alerts keen to avert a repeat of the slow response to the 8.8-magnitude quake in 2010, which devastated large areas of the country.

More than 500 people died in that quake and the tsunami it triggered and memories of the tragedy are still raw.

Tsunami alerts were issued shortly after the quake struck for the entire Chilean coast but have been gradually lifted, with the last cancelled at 06:22 local time.

President Bachelet said that "once again we must confront a powerful blow from nature". She will travel to the affected areas later on Thursday.

Chile is one of the most seismically active locations on the globe.

It runs along the boundary between the Nazca and South American tectonic plates. These are vast slabs of the Earth's surface that grind past each other at a rate of up to 80mm per year.


Link:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



aTRuKWL.jpg

Residents stand on a street outside their houses after an earthquake hit Chile's central zone
Picture: REUTERS/Pablo Sanhueza

rCHljdK.jpg

Residents return to their apatments after rushing down to the streets when a quake struck Santiago, Chile
Picture: Matias Delacroix/AGENCIA UNO via AP


Back to bottling my Grenache
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
FePZqIK.jpg

Fishing boats were washed up on the quay of the town of Coquimbo after the earthquake that hit areas of central Chile
Picture: REUTERS/Ivan Alvarado


YFA2zqh.jpg

People work on removing the debris of houses and shops destroyed by waves after an earthquake hit areas of central Chile, in Concon city, northwest of Santiago
Picture: Reuters


Back to bottling my Grenache
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Xi Jinping grants WSJ an interview not viewable in China uncensored.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

President Xi Jinping's rare interview with The Wall Street Journal on the eve of his U.S. visit could only be read in China through the filter of state media.
That's because the English and Chinese editions of the newspaper's website are currently blocked by the country's censors.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
is something of a journalistic coup -- Xi rarely speaks with foreign media, and this is his first interview since China's stock markets crashed in June.

The Journal questioned Xi on his government's response to the market crisis, its campaign to build islands in the disputed South China Sea, cybersecurity, and Beijing's anti-corruption crackdown.

The questions were tough, but Xi rarely deviated from the script, instead repeating previous lines taken by the government. He is due to arrive in Seattle on Tuesday for the opening leg of his
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


In some ways, the manner in which the interview was conducted revealed more about China than Xi's answers.

The Journal said that in order to conduct the interview, it submitted a dozen written questions to China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The newspaper's story notes that while other officials "pulled together facts and research for the answers," the foreign ministry said that Xi "revised and reviewed them."

And who is Xi's intended audience? It's certainly not the residents of Beijing, Shanghai or Shenzhen.

Like some of the biggest names in media, the Journal's website is blocked in China. Its Chinese-language version is also inaccessible. Reuters, Bloomberg and The New York Times have also been blacklisted.

Xi's interview was translated by state-run news agency Xinhua, which published a large portion. Many other Chinese media outlets carried the Xinhua version.

It's not just foreign newspapers that are banned. Google (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
), Twitter (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) and Facebook (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) are all off limits inside China's "Great Firewall." Taken together, the restrictions constitute the world's largest -- and most effective -- state-sponsored censorship program.

The Journal used its interview to ask Xi why foreign news sites, including its own, are blocked. Xi's answer was less than illuminating.

"We welcome all foreign companies in China and will respect and protect their lawful rights and interests provided that they abide by the laws and regulations of China and do nothing to undermine China's national interests," he said.

The response underscores the starkly different approaches the U.S. and China have to media, censorship and the Internet.

Earlier this week, Rupert Murdoch, the executive chairman at News Corp, which owns the Journal, met with Xi in Beijing.

"[We] welcome foreign media and correspondents to cover China stories, introducing China's development to the world, and helping the world grasp the opportunities [afforded by] China's development," the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, according to state media.
 

JayBird

Junior Member
Xi Jinping grants WSJ an interview not viewable in China uncensored.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Maybe these media organizations should look in the mirror why they were blocked by China, because they are notorious for being twisting facts in a way to put China in bad light and anti-China overall. I'm sure the interview of Xi will probably interpreted into something a little sinister than it actually is if they follow the way they usually report everything about China.

One thing I give the western media though, they are so much better and sophisticated at propaganda than the Chinese media which still runs like from the 60s. It didn't help today's world is dominated by English writing and Speaking which China is not. It's much easier for Western world to spread their messages.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Ominous ripples in Syria, if what's said is based on truth and facts.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Turkey-backed Chinese Uyghur terrorists are gaining a stronghold in Syria from which to launch attacks on China.

Chinese Uyghur terrorists establishing base in Syria

A new
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
reported that 3,500 Uyghurs are settling in a village near Jisr-al Shagour that was just taken from Assad, close to the stronghold of Turkistan Islamic Party (TIP) that is in the Turkey-backed Army of Conquest. They are allegedly under the supervision of Turkish intelligence that has been accused of supplying
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to recruit Chinese Uyghurs to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in Syria.

The news comes on the heels of TIP
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and acquiring MIG fighter jets as well as other advanced weaponry, similar to ISIS capturing Iraqi army’s advanced US weaponry.

It also comes on the heels of the Bangkok bombing at the shrine frequented by Chinese tourists, with Thai authorities now drawing a link to Uyghurs “and the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that attacked the Thai Consulate in Turkey” in reference to Turkey’s
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

This seems to corroborate IHS Jane’s analyst Anthony Davis’s assessment that
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
are the likely culprit, given their anti-Chinese protests and violent demonstration back in July.

Through Turkey’s support for the Army of Conquest, TIP has risen to prominence within the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and played a key role in defeating the Syrian army at Jisr al Shughour earlier this year.

The most prominent TIP fighter to emerge from the Jisr al Shughur videos was the spokesman for TIP’s “Syria branch” since 2014,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
In the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
he led fighters to take over a building, and climbed a clock tower to plant a black-and-white Jabhat al Nusra style flag on which “Turkistan Islamic Party” was written in Arabic.

These Uyghur militants have claimed a series of high-profile terrorists attacks in China in 2013 and 2014, with some Uyghurs calling for an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
against the Chinese communist regime.

Now that TIP has established a base in Syria and is expanding its presence and recruitment courtesy of its Turkish sponsors, China will have to follow through with its 2013 recommendation “
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and deploy troops to Syria.

Non-interference does not mean inaction on core interests

Some pundits may point to China’s non-interference principle as an impasse to action. However, China’s non-interference principle is more in reference to meddling in other countries’ domestics politics, such as US/western penchant for intervention and violating other countries’ sovereignty to overthrow autocratic regimes they dislike. Non-interference policy does not mean inaction when China’s security and interests are threatened.

It is not difficult for China to take action when its core interests are threatened–that means violation of its sovereignty, territorial integrity, economic development and regime survival.

At the 2011 IISS Asia Security Summit, Chinese Defense Minister Liang Guanglie spelled out China’s core interests as the following: “The core interests include anything related to sovereignty, stability and form of government. China is now pursuing socialism. If there is any attempt to reject this path, it will touch upon China’s core interests. Or, if there is any attempt to encourage any part of China to secede, that also touches upon China’s core interests related to our land, sea or air. Then, anything that is related to China’s national economic and social development also touches upon China core interests”.

If the TIP continues to gain power within the Army of Conquest that is a jihadi witches brew of various al Qaeda affiliates and salafist extremists, Xinjiang may become the next Afghanistan and follow the pattern of Afpak, Syria/Iraq, with local militant forces/cross border havens attracting foreign fighters, and enjoying material and diplomatic support from Turkey and other outside powers with shared ideology/interests.

Moreover, the Assad regime is currently still the legal and UN-recognized government of Syria, despite only holding 1/3 of its territory. If Assad asks and gives permission for Russia, China and other SCO members to assist him militarily, that would be in accordance with international law.

This differs from the current US-led anti-ISIS coalition airstrikes in Syria that is neither operating under a UN mandate nor permission from the sovereign government, although it enjoys implicit permission to some extent from the Assad regime to fight ISIS. In 2014 Britain’s David Cameron hesitated to participate in Syrian airstrikes precisely due to fears of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Turkey’s proxy war with China

With Erdogan waging an Islamist proxy war on China, Kurds, Assad, Sisi, Netanyahu via Al Qaeda affiliates, Army of Conquest, Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, it is no wonder
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
both applied to join the China-led SCO in June this year.

Thus Syria and China both share threats from the Army of Conquest that is attacking Assad and China’s Xinjiang. As
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
noted, it is also worrying for the Chinese that when Palestinian President Abbas visited Erdogan’s new presidential palace in January 2015, the honor guards of 16 soldiers dressed in historical warrior costumes included a Uyghur.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Each warrior represents one of the 16 “great (or historic) Turkish empires” commemorated on Turkey’s official seal, one of which is the Uyghur Khanate that had subjected the Tang Dynasty to a de facto tributary relation when the Chinese empire was weak.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, we know that the Uyghur warrior was the sixth man from the top of the steps on the left.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


With Erdogan expanding Turkey’s influence in Syria and ambitions to reconstitute the “Turkic world from the Adriatic Sea to the Great Wall” of China, should SCO aspirant member Syria request aid and grant permission, China can indeed march its troops across the Silk Road to “take the fight to ETIM before threat grows.”
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Not exactly breaking news for regular SDF readers, but close enough for government purpose. This quote is especially alarming: "But they missed the other side of Mr. Xi, “the risk taker,” in the words of one of Mr. Obama’s former top aides, “who is more nationalistic than we thought and more willing to be confrontational.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


WASHINGTON — For the past two years, the critical question confronting the Obama administration about Xi Jinping, the Chinese president who defied American predictions by challenging the United States’ superpower status early and directly, has been how forcefully to respond.

When Mr. Xi, barely a year in office, declared an exclusive “air defense identification zone” over a vast stretch of territory, the Obama administration immediately sent B-52s right through the space, and Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. spent seven hours with the new Chinese leader, telling him, as one participant in the discussion recalled, “You will be seeing a lot more of this.”

But on a range of issues since then, from how directly to challenge China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea to creating a cost for cyberespionage, the response has been less certain.

This week’s meeting between President Obama and Mr. Xi is fraught with points of conflict, and its unspoken subtext is whether the president will confront the Chinese directly, deliberately causing friction in the relationship in hopes of drawing some lines around their behavior, or celebrate an unexpected partnership on issues like climate change and Iran, handling contentious issues in private.

The administration has tried both approaches, and has often come away frustrated and dissatisfied, according to senior officials, some of whom have left the government recently and spoke on the condition of anonymity. But Mr. Obama recognizes that what amounts to his third long meeting with Mr. Xi, a formal state visit full of ceremonial displays of respect and cooperation that begins here Thursday, is likely to be his last chance to start what one White House official calls “long-ball diplomacy with the Chinese.”

By the next major meeting between the two men, the official said, “Obama will have only months left in office.”

Musing on his dealings with China before an audience of business leaders last week, Mr. Obama noted that the Chinese were only episodically willing to take on the responsibilities that come with being a global power.

“In other areas,” he said, “they still see themselves as the poor country that shouldn’t have any obligations internationally.”

What is different about this meeting, however, is that Mr. Obama finally has some leverage — the tool that he once railed in a Situation Room meeting has often been missing with Beijing. A China weakened somewhat by economic downturn, and eager to calm the markets by showing it can manage its relationship with its most important trading partner and geopolitical rival, may be eager to avoid any open signs of rift — at least for a while.

The most potent evidence of that came after Susan E. Rice, Mr. Obama’s national security adviser, traveled to Beijing in late August to see Mr. Xi and try to plan out the trip. She warned that unless Mr. Xi acted on restraining what Ms. Rice in a speech on Monday called “cyber-enabled espionage that targets personal and corporate information for the economic gain of businesses” in China, Mr. Obama was prepared to impose sanctions, perhaps before Mr. Xi’s arrival.

The Chinese reaction was swift: Mr. Xi dispatched Meng Jianzhu, a close Communist Party adviser to Mr. Xi and head of state security, to make a highly unusual trip to Washington, along with some 50 aides, to work out a deal. On his return, he began speaking for the first time about the need to crack down on the theft of intellectual property — as opposed to espionage for national security, a distinction the Chinese never acknowledged before.

Negotiations are also underway on embracing a set of rules, expected to be vague in their first iteration, that commit both countries to “no first use” of cyberweapons against each other’s critical infrastructure in peacetime.

“They’re not denying anymore that it’s a problem,” a senior official said. “We’re not having a dialogue of the deaf anymore.” The question is whether Mr. Xi is looking to pave over disputes, or solve them.

The struggle to read China’s leader is not new. When it became clear in 2011 that he was emerging as China’s next president, Mr. Biden was dispatched to get to know him. They visited each other in elaborately choreographed trips in Beijing and Washington. But views of him varied.

Thomas Donilon, Ms. Rice’s predecessor, had been passing around a paper written by Dai Bingguo, the state councilor under Mr. Xi’s predecessor, arguing against provoking the United States and its allies in the South China Sea and warning the Chinese military to bide its time. Others in the administration saw Mr. Xi as a dynamic reformer who would press for broader engagement with the United States while bringing the military under his control.

But they missed the other side of Mr. Xi, “the risk taker,” in the words of one of Mr. Obama’s former top aides, “who is more nationalistic than we thought and more willing to be confrontational.”

“This is not the U.S.-China relationship that senior Obama officials expected,” either at the start of Mr. Obama’s tenure in 2009 or the beginning of Mr. Xi’s in 2013, said Michael J. Green, an Asia specialist at the Center for Strategic and International Studies who served at the National Security Council under President George W. Bush. “The assumptions that many people had, that cooperation on transnational threats like climate change would ameliorate problems in geopolitical arenas, was wrong.”

In her speech on Monday, Ms. Rice made it clear the United States and China would showcase their cooperation on climate change, with a deal on carrying out a broad emissions accord they struck last year during a meeting in Beijing. There will also be agreement on a code of conduct to reduce the risk of accidents between American and Chinese aircraft, and steps to expand educational exchanges between the two countries.

But on the areas of sharpest disagreement, such as human rights, the South China Sea and cyberattacks, there is still a wide gulf, and for weeks the White House has been debating how to handle them.

The South China Sea issue erupted last week in the Senate Armed Services Committee when Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, pressed David Shear, the top Pentagon official in charge of Asia and the Pacific, to declare when the last time was that the United States sent ships or aircraft closer than 12 nautical miles to the newly reclaimed reefs.

Twelve miles is the usual limit for “territorial waters,” so the operation would show that the United States did not consider this to be Beijing’s sovereign land. Reluctantly, Mr. Shear said the last time was in 2012, before Mr. Xi took office.

“The United States of America will sail, fly and operate anywhere that international law permits,” Ms. Rice said during her speech, repeating the administration’s policy on the matter. But one official said Secretary of State John Kerry and his deputies, along with several intelligence officials, did not see the value in forcing the Chinese to react. Others disagree.

“They’re cultivating strategic ambiguity,” Patrick M. Cronin, the director of the Asia-Pacific Security Program at the Center for a New American Security, said of the Chinese. “What we need, though, is more clarity about our interests. We have to do more to reinforce rules of the road that are against coercion or force, and against this Chinese buildup.”

Senator Benjamin L. Cardin of Maryland, the senior Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, said policy makers never anticipated this degree of trouble from Mr. Xi, either on maritime issues or on human rights, a prime area of concern after the Chinese president moved to crack down on dissidents and lawyers and took aim at civil society groups.

Representatives of an array of those groups met with Ms. Rice at the White House on Tuesday to discuss concerns about China’s proposed legislation to tighten controls on foreign nongovernmental organizations, and senior officials said the topic would be a focus of the meetings between the two presidents.

“Originally, there was reason for optimism about the speed of change in China” under Mr. Xi, said Mr. Cardin, one of a group of lawmakers set to meet with the Chinese president on Capitol Hill on Friday. “And now there’s sort of disappointment.”
 

shen

Senior Member
Not exactly breaking news for regular SDF readers, but close enough for government purpose. This quote is especially alarming: "But they missed the other side of Mr. Xi, “the risk taker,” in the words of one of Mr. Obama’s former top aides, “who is more nationalistic than we thought and more willing to be confrontational.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

“This is not the U.S.-China relationship that senior Obama officials expected,” either at the start of Mr. Obama’s tenure in 2009 or the beginning of Mr. Xi’s in 2013

what did they expect? that China will just do nothing to counter the US "pivot" to contain China and stir up color revolution in Hong Kong.
 
Top