The selection bias is that foreigners are overrepresented the only jobs they are allowed to work and that career preferences transmit vertically.
Puahahaha, so the "only" jobs that East Asians are allowed to work are at the highest rungs of innovation? I know the US has picked up the new hobby of shooting itself in the foot eversince 2016 but do you y'all have to do it with a shotgun?
It’s not. Not sure why you continue to continue to harp on this point.
That's ironically what everyone else here thinks about you, the person who thinks everyone else is driving the wrong way on the highway. And also, I harp it because it's true, the data shows its true, anecdotes show it's true, only American lawyer/politician excuses try to escape that truth.
East Asian enrollment is ~2-3% of total elementary/secondary education enrollment in the U.S.
And when it comes to STEM PhDs, Asians go up to 13% (page 9) and then when we go PhDs in the STEM workforce, that's 45% (post #6,788 on this thread). We just get better and better. The higher you go, the more of us there are. But I'm sure you'll come up with some American cope excuse to make yourself feel better this time too.
As previously explained - US born residents don’t need to work in any particular job to continue to be allowed to stay in the United States and that will result in a much more diverse range of education and career choices.
As previously explained, this has no good implications for you. If it bears any influence on this topic, it means that the US allots its most sensitive and intellectually important jobs to foreigners, which is probably only done because its locals aren't up to the job.
also, the Asian immigrants are going to be firmly rooted in the U.S. - they have decades in the U.S., houses, US-born children, US professional networks, U.S. assets, U.S. citizenship (and by implication, no citizenship of Asian countries), accounts receivables from social security and Medicare, etc and doubly-so for their children who have only no material ties to other countries. Those “Asians” are firmly rooted in the U.S. and no other country. Their race and national origin are tbh, quite irrelevant, outside of a civil rights context.
Ahahaha, yes, yes, they are all very loyal and American. Tell the FBI to stop targetting and investigating Chinese American academics because they are just Americans like white people! See what your own FBI thinks about your assertion. In WWII, the US military sent Japanese American soldiers to fight Germany and German American soldiers to fight Japan; they avoided as much as possible sending one to fight against his own ancestral lands. Apparently, you can't figure out why...
The U.S. having effective education is not contradictory to China having effective education. The two statements are quite harmonious.
Zero sum game; a child with Down Syndrome develops and reaches milestones too. But the US has trapped itself in a hostile competition against China; now, if it swims slower than the Chinese current, it's going backwards.
Even ignoring the questionable statement that “the U.S. is completely unable to compete with China”, for example, see the melting down on this site about ChatGPT and Nvidia earnings; the network effects, scale, technology, workforce development, and existing capital stock that US firms have built over the decades have will endure into perpetuity and continue to drive US firms to the top of the rank tables for decades in the future, regardless of what happens in China.
Melting down for what? ChatGPT? It's a toy, and China makes one on its heels within months of its debut. Nvidia earnings? I'm not even aware of what they earn nor do I care to find out about this midget making a mountain of of a molehill. Nobody in China cares about Nvidia while everyone in America freaks about about Huawei/SMIC/SMEE. Here; I'll show you meltdowns right in your congress about China's success and America's inability to compete:
Every CCP session is about how to improve China. Every US congressional session is a meltdown about what dirty tricks they can muster to stop China from running the US over. It's to a point where, "Let's just breed the pandas and keep the babies illegally" has become a serious topic.
For example, even though it’s been the greater part of a decade since the ZTE ban went into force, in 2023, Intel made more in a month than SMIC made during the entire calendar year.
Intel is a general computer company while SMIC is a semiconductor fab company. Intel's job is to make money integrating parts. SMIC's job is to give China an independent and indegenous lithography line, which no other country has. SMIC sends shivers through the halls of American congress, where every effort is made to just slow it down. Nobody in China cares what Intel does.
